|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Nostalgia
|
Ian Price
unregistered
|
posted 05-30-1999 03:48 AM
Star Wars Episode 4 came out in May 1977. I was 14 years old. It played in one theatre in Denver. The Cooper had 850 seats. You could smoke in the balcony. That first week the theatre was empty because no one had discovered Star Wars yet. After the first week, word had gotten out. There were lines around the block. My mother wanted to see the film. I took the bus to the cooper at 9:30 am and stood in line. I purchased our tickets for the 1:00 p.m. show right after the 10:00 am show sold out. I stood in the ticket holder line for two hours until my mother showed up. This didn’t seem like too much of an ordeal. The movie was exclusive at the Cooper for 6 weeks. It played that theatre for something like 9 months. The Cooper ran the film in 70mm 6-track Dolby. They ran reel to reel with carbon arc lamphouses. I saw Star Wars 4 times that year. Was Denver that small in 1977? I waited for the sequels to play at the Cooper because it was the best movie theatre I have ever seen. They tore it down 4 years ago and there is now a Barnes and Noble there. The Cooper had Norelco AA2s. The speakers were Altec Lansing A4s. There were 5 behind the screen and there were A4s let in to the walls as surrounds. The screen got 50% larger when they were running 70mm.
|
|
Joe Redifer
unregistered
|
posted 05-30-1999 03:49 AM
I really liked how the Cooper's screen was stained yellow from all the smoking that used to be allowed there. I think the last movie I saw on that screen was "Spaceballs". Those Cinerama screens were insanely curved (more so than the Continental, or at least it seemed). It definitely was a nicer theatre, even considering the Cont's remodel. When will companies learn and begin to build HUGE screens like they used to in the old days? Not this crap like the Denver Pavillions and the UA Colorado Center where the screen is big but the throw is so short that you can't even focus the xenon bulb without having extremely dark corners! 70mm is dead. Oh this is sad. Is the exhibition industry getting worse over time, despite the latest advancements in technology? I believe that maybe it is, but it doesn't have to.
|
|
Mitchell Cope
unregistered
|
posted 05-30-1999 03:49 AM
I'm reading a book called "Widescreen Cinema". I don't have the book in front of me or I would give you the author's name. Its point seems to be that Cinerama and Todd-AO were all developed outside of the industry. The industry in the late 50's could only agree on what the author calls a "poor man's CinemaScope", a 35mm widescreen process without the original stereo sound offered by CinemaScope. What I didn't know was that 20th Century-Fox had actually developed a 70mm system called Grandeur back in the late 20's. The industry would accept the addition of sound, but not a new film standard. (Another point of the book I found fascinating was that WEEKLY audience attendance in the late 20's (before sound) and through the war was 90 million! Sound didn't actually help or hurt audience attendance at that time. By the early 60's, weekly audience attendance was down around 16 million. I don't think we fully appreciate how important movies were to the country in the early part of this century.)
|
|
Ian Price
unregistered
|
posted 05-30-1999 03:50 AM
I had this statistic thrown at me by an older theatre manager a few years ago. Per capita movie consumption in the US in the late 50s was 26 films per year. That is one film every two weeks for every man, woman & child in the United States. Per capita movie consumption by the early 80s had declined to 4 films per year. They think that only 30% of the population go to movie theatres any more. This means that everybody who is going to the theatres is only seeing 16 films a year. What has happened is there is more competition for our eyeballs. Our choices are TV, computers, plays, the gym, video games, and would you believe books. The thinking is that the per capita movie consumption number is only going to shrink. The only saving grace has been the increase in population in the United States. All statistics in this piece are conjecture and hearsay. I wouldn’t treat it a gospel. If anybody has any real statistics, please chime in.
|
|
Stephen Winner
unregistered
|
posted 05-30-1999 03:50 AM
I can definitely agree to this! Our house was designed to house 1400 guests, but hasn't had that many people in it in years. At best, we'll get about 800 to 1000 on a really good night. You are right about the "distractions" though. With TV, Satellites, VCR's, Computers, etc, it's easy to get your fill of motion pictures these days...to the point of overwhelming you. Back in the Pre-TV days though there was a lot more at the movies than a long TV program. You had live music & actors on stage, news reels, cartoons, and the feature film on a typical ticket. Plus the atmosphere was much more special (and still is at our house!) Movies were a technological marvel, and to produce sound and pictures big enough for thousands of people to see at one time was quiet a feat. Couple this with the elaborate decorations inside the theatre, gourmet foods in the lobby, not just snacks, and big elaborate marquees and flashing lights outside, the movie theatre used to be much more than it is today!
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|