|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Author
|
Topic: Volume levels in theaters
|
Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 09-03-1999 01:11 PM
Someone I know mentioned to me that he sees people asleep in the theaters all the time, and this is due to the high volume levels that they encounter. The decibel levels are too high. Have any of you ever gone to a rock concert, and come away with your ears ringing, and feeling exausted? Theaters seem to be worse, because the room is smaller than most concert stages, and the walls are treated with various kinds of sound proofing. The new digital sound is pumping more volume than optical sound ever dreamed of, and running the same amount of output wattage. Why is it that the sound level has to be totally screaming at you? He is not an old fart complaining. He is a rock musician. I've tested this theory on a theater viewing of "Die Hard." I saw it in a loud theater, and I fell asleep, which is something I dont do in a theater, normally. I rented it on VHS and ran it at home on my Hi-Fi system at a decent volume level, and I never once got tired. So, on this note, what do you think? Are decibel levels relevant or not? Have you ever put on headphones and blasted music (or whatever) for any length of time? I have, and it put me to sleep. I think that there is too much emphasis on the sound quality, and not enough on the picture. Sometimes the lamp brightness is low, or blue-looking, etc. but the loudness is what I am talking about here. Whatcha think, guys? Will this change anything, or should people just bring ear plugs?
| IP: Logged
|
|
Erika Hellgren
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 168
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-03-1999 04:37 PM
I really have to chime in on this one, as sound level is a great concern of mine. I believe it was around the year that Twister came out that the digital mixes in movies just got louder and louder. And this was about the same year I began complaining about cronic headaches. That's what I suffer from when I watch loud movies (I rarely fall asleep, the movie has to be super boring in order for that to happen).Anyway, I don't agree that picture should be of greater concern than sound - in my opinion the two should be dealt with with equal attention. In my experience, if you are getting a high number of volume complaints from patrons, it could be one or all of three problems. First, is the auditorium properly EQed? I cannot tell you how often I go to theatres where the levels are WAY off. The primary reason for this is because of "movable digital units". DTS's biggest selling point is that their units are movable. My advice from many years of blown speakers is -- DON'T!!! If you're going to move a digital unit, you need to reset the levels EVERYTIME! And you must have the proper equipment for this (sound level meter, DTS imperical test disc, ect.) I find that the best levels are: 85db for Right and Left, 84db for Center, 83db for both Surrounds, and 92db for Subs. Second, the problem may be the movie's mix. I gotta tell ya, there are some terrible sound mixers out there, and most of them work for Jerry Bruckhiemer. Honestly, if you ever get one of his movies, TURN IT DOWN! Aramageddon gave me a blaring headache -- too much high end, and way too many sounds mixed in all at once. My ears can only take so much. So, this is why it is very important to screen movies before showing them to an audience, so that you can determine the best level to play them at. (Pleasantville, for example, needed to be played at 7.0) And, unfortunately this causes another problem, because too many projectionists I've met want to play movies too loud cause they think it's "cool" or something. But, truly, the customers rarely find it cool, nor do the techs when they have to replace blown tweeters. Watch your amps to make sure they are not clipping, and always keep the paying customers' eardrums in mind. A third problem that we have to encounter reguarding sound is trailers. That's when customers complain the most about sound. Luckily, I work with an automation system that has volume change options, so I play trailers quite a bit quieter than the movie itself. But for those not blessed with the same equipment, the tendency is to turn the fader down during the trailers when the customers complain, then it never gets turned up again for the movie. I don't know a single UA theatre in my town that doesn't play their movies at 4.5 or lower. In my opinion that is as unnecessary as playing movies too loud. I know that monitoring fader levels in a multiplex is near impossible, but there are solutions. For example, check out the advice Brad has on this website - I think it's called "Battling loud trailers." Anyway, I've rambled on enough (I could go on forever about this topic, but I won't)
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-03-1999 05:32 PM
Interesting observations. I'd never really made the connection between "loudness" and "tendency to fall asleep," but now that you mention it, I can recall sitting in a VERY loud theatre during the initial release of "Return of the Jedi" and dozing off right in the middle of the film, not waking up until the end of the credits! I agree that too much emphasis has been placed on film sound in the past several years at the expense of image quality. Of course, both sound and picture quality are important, but, given the choice, I'd rather have a razor-sharp picture, properly cropped with a well-cut aperture plate, and the sound system from hell than be forced to endure a film in glorious 70mm six-track Dolby SR mag projected with the lamphouses and lenses from hell. Multichannel sound is nice, but overrated. I'd much rather have a really top-quality mono system than a compromised Dolby Stereo (or, worse, digital) system. The mono optical tracks on old IB Tech 35mm prints blow away most current tracks with respect to dynamic range and clarity. (I'm referring to area tracks here...I'm not advocating density tracks!). I hope that people don't misinterpret this post...of course sound is important, but I can get reasonably good quality sound at home with a VCR or Laserdisc or DVD player. On the other hand, NTSC television will never come close to matching the potential for image quality with 35mm or even 16mm film, given proper lenses, masking, screens, aperture plates, and lamphouses.
One last comment--it seems that the first-run houses tend to play films way too loudly and the second-run and art/rep houses do exactly the opposite. The added dynamic range of the digital systems in the first-run theatres may have something to do with it, but I think that there's more to it than that. Would anyone care to try to explain this?
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 09-03-1999 08:33 PM
This thread ought to get REAL interesting.Personally I must admit I think Bruce is correct here...with a few specifics. How bright is that lamp? Crank it up over 18fl and you will fall asleep purely from the eye strain! Is there enough low end in the system to take the harshness out of the sound? For some oddball reason, many engineers seem to think the low end should be rolled off just like the high end! This tends to make the sound unnecessarily harsh and the eardrums cannot handle the decibel levels without the low end's air pressure, resulting in a headache. I'm by no means an expert, but I know what I've experienced. My personal (and medically unconfirmed) theory is the eardrums are similar to the eyes. When it is bright, the iris in your eyes close to protect them from the intense light. Consequently they open up when it is darker. I believe a similar thing happens with the ears. When there is a lot of bass in the sound, the ears "close up" to protect themselves. When there is a lack of bass (say from an engineer rolling off the bass to prevent bleedthrough in less than ideal installations), the ears "stay open" and basically get blasted. The end result is a headache and ringing. But as always, don't take my word for it. Watch a movie one day when you're feeling good and alert on a good system which has been well calibrated. Then, go back on another day when you feel equally well and alert and watch the same film, but this time roll off the bass. (This can be accomplished by using the "bass" control on the cat64s in a Dolby processor and turning off the subwoofer amplifiers for the show.) Now run the film at exactly the same fader setting. You WILL have a headache in no time. Playing SR tracks through Dolby A decoders is a very similar effect. I must also point out the lack of a good eq. The best system in the world will sound like absolute crap if it is not properly eq'd! This MUST be done with a multiplexer and real time analyzer. I prefer to cut to correct for acoustics and speakers rather than boost. Boosting frequencies tends to add a false sound to the system. Consequently, regardless of what people may say, the "digital" eqs found in SDDS and the CP500 must be eq'd in the same manner as analog eqs. Many people seem to be fooled into thinking they can crank one frequency and kill the next one without compromise. That practice will result in bad sound every time. No two adjacent frequencies should be very far from each other. Before I stop blabbing here, I must also point out the need for actual listening in the auditorium during calibration. Many engineers simply eq a flat line with the standard high frequency rolloff and quit. This is great and all, but the final adjustments MUST be done by ear. Larger rooms require less treble and more bass while smaller rooms require more treble and less bass. Generally this can be accomplished purely by the course bass and treble controls on Dolby processors. Other processors do not have this and the eq process (to do it right) will take much longer. One last thing, watch the 4K area! That seems to be the headache-central frequency sound mixers love to use. Anyone see "The Mummy"? I don't think it would've been possible for the mixers to crank the 2-8K frequencies up any more on that title! Personally I prefer to make a slight dip smoothly around those frequencies (not a lot, just a touch) as I feel it greatly improves the sound. Another area to watch out for is the 160-400hz area. Since many engineers tend to start the rolloff around 100hz or so, those frequencies will leave you with a jukebox-type sound, as if the sound is traveling through a tube. Slight rolloffs there (depending on the room) are many times advantageous. Done properly, that same film which is killing the audience at 4.5 should be able to be ran well over 8.0 without headaches. Oh yeah, we were talking about falling asleep. In reference to the sound, yes...but only on a good system.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Kenn Fong
Film Handler
Posts: 47
From: Oakland, CA 94610 USA
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 09-03-1999 10:34 PM
Yes, everything is TOO LOUD. As an usher, I'm supposed to clean the auditoriums as soon as the customers leave, (or work in such a way as to not disturb them). That means I'm in the auditorium during the closing credits. I received permission not to clean "Detroit Rock City" until the credits ended because the sound was ear-bleed loud. After mentioning this to the projectionists, they lowered it a little but left it high because that crowd -- that's generous since no one came to see it -- likes their music loud.I should say our union projectionists at the Grand Lake take a lot of pride in their presentation and do ride the levels conscientiously. (They haven't yet become regular readers here -- despite my urging and printing out of the material for their perusal -- so I needn't worry about brown-nosing.) I took my 2.5 year-old nephew to see "Muppets In Space" at his local monsterplex and he kept saying, "tooo loud" and three complaints at the snack bar (and resulting phone calls to the booth) yielded no relief. I know the pots will be set too high at one local monsterplex so I bring plugs. ------------------ Kenn Fong http://qwertyuiop.net Screenwriter's Home Page
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 09-04-1999 12:27 AM
I'm glad everyone feels this way. Actually, I bore as easily as anybody when a show is dull. My remarks about picture vs. sound were wrong, as Erika correctly stated. My frend and I had a long discussion before I wrote the epic post. He saw the Blair thing this past weekend and noted that patrons were covering their ears during some vocal parts of the film. He is very careful with his ears. Acid Rock is his game, and yet he can hear someone outside with the windows closed with the TV blaring (Not starting on TV sound...) As was stated earlier, the eyes get tired, and so do the ears. Since your balance is here, too, you might close your eyes if you are feeling a bit lite-headed, then snooze. As for dull films, I have been known to love films that smelled. Plan 9, Glen or Glenda? Many AIP, or most of todays films? We just basically think that films are relying on wild sound mixing, and loud music to cover a weak story, or something to that effect. Give me simple 2-channel stereo. You get a neet phantom center channel. The thing that started this was the fact that I was playing the sound too loud, and EQ'd poorly here on the home system. With a few adjustments, I saw the light. Heard it too. Bruce
| IP: Logged
|
|
AndrewBurnell
Film Handler
Posts: 17
From: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 09-04-1999 08:35 AM
While it's a bit off topic...I don't see why we even have surround channels... In our theatre the most you'd be able to hear through them is for about 5mins in total through a 2hr movie. As far as loudness goes, we keep a really good eye on it, we turn our analogue tracks up a tiny bit since they don't have the 'punch' DTS has. 3/6 of our theatres have DTS and we move the DTS units around a lot, I know we also don't re-eq after each one. On another good note I'm being trained in the box office next week, my last step b4 projection! Sorry, I just had to tell someone
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 09-05-1999 01:52 AM
It seems as though some of you are advocating elimination of the surround channel altogether. Carrying this to its logical conclusion, may we look forward to the next few posts suggesting that since, in long narrow theatres, it is difficult to differentiate separation of the stage channels, wouldn't mono be a wonderful way to go? (Hasn't this already been suggested?). I agree that,while improper level setting and incompetent equalization of the surround channels may prove devastating to the enjoyment of any film, the surround channel, when set up properly, defenitley adds to the presentation. Watching a motion picture as Ted Uzzle of Altec once stated, was like "sitting in a dark tunnel, looking out into bright daylight. The addition of the surround channel helps to bring you out of that tunnel". Properly set up (and admittedly properly mixed), the surround channel should act as an almost subliminal adjunct to the screen action -the rustle of leaves as two figures are walking through a woods, the echo of voices in a tunnel, - you fill in your own examples. As a technician, I too have had to deal with theatre owners who scream "I paid for 'em, I want to hear 'em". It takes a great deal of tact and diplomacy to convince these people that louder is not always better. Even after an installation is complete, digital problems with the surround levels occur. (People put their digits on them). Still, provided that the levels and EQ are set correctly, and providing that your settings are not altered, the surround channel. as I have already mentioned, should be an addittion - not a distraction from the performance. Also, I am somewhat confused over the comment that the D.T.S. levels should be reset each time the unit is moved. Assuming that the cinema processor B-chains have been properly set up in each theatre (for example, 85 dbC-slow in the case of Dolby), (the adjustments for this are in the B-chain section of the processor), should not an accessory unit, such as D.T.S. which worked in one auditorium, produce the same equivalent levels in another auditorium?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|