|
|
Author
|
Topic: What is a gate cooling system??
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 12-14-1999 08:12 AM
As Ken mentioned, "water cooled" gates are a good option for projectors using lamps greater than 4000-watts. The gates remain cool to the touch, increasing operator comfort during threading. The cooler gate rails are less likely to abrade the emulsion and "bake on" hardened deposits of gelatin emulsion from the film. However, water-cooled gates will NOT prevent film damage from excessive radiant energy ("hot spot" damage including blistering, scorching and dye-migration), since this damage is usually caused by excess radiant energy being absorbed by the film, and not by the film contacting the hot metal parts of the gate. Damage from excess radiant energy is best prevented by using efficient heat filters ("cold mirrors" or dichroic heat filters) and proper alignment and focus of the lamphouse optics to avoid "hot spots".------------------ John Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Eastman Kodak Company Rochester, NY 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Scholz
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 223
From: Schoenberg, Germany
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 12-14-1999 03:14 PM
The Bauer projectors always used a compressed air cooling system, which cooled the film and gate. Special compressors were installed in seperate rooms, and send an air stream of 800 hpa through the gate construction and ended in special nozzles to cool the film on both sides. The system prooved to be extremely efficientz, as most heat and absorbed radient energy was taken off the film. Unfortunately the small compressors and the nozzles were quite noisy, and when the compressor was installed within the projector's foot, like at Bauer U2, it was impossible to sit next to it. This is mainly why the system disappeared. Water cooling has never been efficient in keeping absorbed energy off the film. I remember, as beeing high school student, we placed nitrate film in the gate, ran our HI arclamps at 65 Amps, and disengaged the safety shutters. The film stayed in focus for nearly 40 minutes, and never caught fire. Without the blower running, it caught fire immediately, the moment we opened the shutter. This proved quite well on effectiveness.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|