|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: How Trailer scenes change in final cuts.
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-02-2000 01:19 PM
That doesn't surprise me. Many times production on a trailer starts with some of the first footage shot, well before the post production of the feature is done. So the scenes and dialog that end up in the feature may be quite different than the trailers.It's not unusual for the "final cut" negative to arrive at the lab a couple weeks before over 3000 prints need to be in theatres. The first and last reels are notoriously late, since the opening titles and end credits are often not decided until the last possible moment --- this is one factor that has held back 6000-foot Extended Length Reels (ELR). At least with 2000-foot reels, the lab can begin printing the middle reels, even if the titles and credits haven't been decided. I just purchased a DVD of GWTW. The 1938 trailer included on the DVD did not have a single scene from the final movie --- it was a series of pre-production sketches in a "book" as the pages were turned. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Colin Wiseley
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 123
From: Blacksburg, VA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-02-2000 02:27 PM
We ran the trailer for Cradle Will Rock for about a month and there's a part in it where a character says, "When the storm breaks..." (cut to another scene with different characters) "...the cradle will rock." In the actual movie the first character says, "When the storm breaks, the cradle will FALL." There's always a murmor from the audience when he says fall because they expected rock.One trailer we ran forever that I can always remember lines from is PI: 12:45, restate my assumptions This is insanity, Max! - Or what if it's genius? There will be no order, only chaos. ------------------ Colin Wiseley Lyric Theatre Blacksburg, VA www.thelyric.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-03-2000 11:54 AM
Joe: I agree, I'd much rather watch film on a big screen than a DVD on my 48-inch Sony projection set. Before the DVD, I only had VHS, so it is a step up for me. It's going to be interesting to see how many compression artifacts will be tolerated in the name of efficient transmission of digital cinema data. SMPTE has quite a few good people working on the committee, including some from Kodak. They have quite a challenge!------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Dan Riddle
unregistered
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-03-2000 02:11 PM
Joe,What kind of DVD player do you have? A lot of the older cheaper versions of the players have crappy artifacts mostly in the scenes you talked about, rain, fog, dark greys, and any gradient. But the newer ones have gotten a lot better. I think it'll be awhile until film is beat, if ever. But, you have to admit DVD is a heck of a step up from VHS. Dan
IP: Logged
|
|
Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-03-2000 08:52 PM
Joe: DVDs are mastered in component 4:2:0 format, whereas LaserDisc is composite only. Also, DVDs are often anamorphically enhanced so that letterboxed material is displayed using much higher resolution (same concept as matted 1.85:1 versus the higher resolution of using the full four-perf area for scope). There is also the possibility of progressive scan output.If you are using YUV or RGB (or even s-video) to connect your DVD player to a monitor or TV, then all the dot crawl artifacts of VHS and LaserDisc will be very noticably absent. If you are using a 16:9 display or 'squeezing' a 4:3 display for anamorphic DVDs then there is no contest with LaserDisc. Also, DVDs have far less video noise and virtually (my favourite!) NO chroma tearing. Gotta love those 'hot' colors on VHS and Laser! Regarding compression artifacts - sure, compared to watching uncompressed D1 or even DigiBeta there is a difference. But considering the aggresive ratio of compression, DVD is quite miraculous. Some of the early discs did have some visible artifacts, but it's been a steep learning curve for authors/compressionists and by now, the vast majority of modern discs have virtually invisible compression artifacts. Look at 'Blade' or 'Lost in Space' for two outstanding examples. Of course, they don't quite compare to their D1 masters, but outside of film prints, neither does anything else.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|