|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: ElDorado - What's PG about it?
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-31-2000 06:05 PM
An article in Film Journal makes a pretty big deal about the PG rating of "Road to ElDorado," and the IME newsletter says it contains "sexual innuendo that may upset some." So just how "bad" is it? Are we going to get complaints from mothers and fathers on this? ------------------ Mike Blakesley www.goforsyth.com/roxy
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays
Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 03-31-2000 10:03 PM
Ever notice how all feature cartoons now have to have a buxom young woman with come-hither eyes?Still, nothing will ever beat Preston Blair's show stopper, in Tex Avery's "Red-Hot Riding Hood"!!!
------------------ Better Projection Pays!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Andrew D'Vrey
Film Handler
Posts: 92
From: St. Paul, MN USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-31-2000 11:11 PM
Hmmm...looks like Dreamworks is trampling on Disney's turf! Disney has long been the leader of putting sexual inuendos in their PG or even G cartoons. Who knows...maybe it's a cartoonists thing.All I can say to customers who complain is..."Hey, we aren't the ones who rate these things." ------------------ "And the monkey flips the switch." - Major Don West, "Lost In Space" Andrew D'Vrey IATSE Local 219
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays
Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 04-01-2000 05:49 PM
They are compelled to put this stuff in every movie anymore, not just cartoons. They can't not do it! There's absolutely nothing wrong with putting this stuff in movies that are made for it, but not in children's fare! An otherwise fine movie will be ruined by gratuitous swearing, just so they can avoid that awful "G" rating!I guess that's why I like B-Westerns so much; I know that the bad guy will never win, and a virtuous moral will be the lesson. Plus, these pictures are very fast-paced, which holds the little one's interest. I can comfortably let my son watch a B-Western and not worry about his picking-up new words to use at the dinner table. (And no, he won't learn to use guns to settle his disputes anymore than he'll learn to use a horse to get to school.) I'm convinced that, sometime in the 50s, they forgot how to make movies. ------------------ Better Projection Pays!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Tom Ferreira
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 203
From: Conway, NH, USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-02-2000 08:46 AM
Yeah, and what about that cartoon that came out last summer where every other word was f-this and f-that-you know, the one with Satan and Saddam Hussein. Seriously, the lines have become so blurred these days, and unfortunately most parents don't care what their kids are seeing. I understand that there should be films totally free of any offensive material whatsoever, but more often than not, I can imagine the conversation going like this: Ten year old:Mom, will you buy us tickets to South Park? Mom:Is it violent? Kid:No, it's a cartoon I've heard it all too many times- 1)The parents have the MPAA explination of the reason for the rating right in front of them at the box office. To read it would be time consuming. 2)They've seen anything and everything already, anyway. 3)The parents are potential Springer Guests, and to spend quality time with their children would cut into their drinkin' time. I know I've gotten a little bit away from the specifics of this topic, but the bottom line is that a lot of parents just don't care. I have a little bit more to say about a specific film, but I'll start another thread. As far as El Dorado goes, it seems to be instantly DOA at the box office. I will agree with one thing: why make an animated film with this subject matter? Kids today will flock to a branded, proven property(witness the success of Nickelodeon's Snow Day), or the flavor of the moment(Pokemon and the first Power Rangers movie). Something tells me that perhaps some of these animators should take their heads out of their asses, stop trying to make high art, and make something that kids want to see. Besides, if Dreamworks had any faith in this picture, why did they release it at the end of March????
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Wilson
Film God
Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 04-02-2000 08:17 PM
A mother came in the other day with two ten year old boys to see...wait for it... Scream 3.Mother: "I'd like two child tickets for these boys for Scream 3" Box Office: "And another for yourself?" M:"I don't want to see that" B.O.: "This is an MA film (your R) and 10 year olds can't see it without an adult." M: "Why not?" B.O.: "It's the law. This film is not suitable for 10 year old children" M: (Getting disgruntled)"I don't see why that should be the case! They've seen the other two!" ...and we all wonder why they are killing each other in the schools. If parenting is too hard for you to place some guidelines on what your children see, why not try contraception? That IS legal.
| IP: Logged
|
|
AndrewBurnell
Film Handler
Posts: 17
From: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Registered: Aug 1999
|
posted 04-03-2000 07:24 AM
We had that exact same problem last night.Lady wants to know why we won't let her eleven year old son in to Scream 3 with his older brother. We replied simply: "We should imagine you wouldn't want to expose your children to that type of violence anyway" Our response: "Oh... ummm yeah i guess" I think we foiled someones plans for a evening without the children. I start my first shift in projection training next week if anyone is interested in sending me some advice!
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 04-03-2000 11:30 AM
The April 2000 issue of "NATO News" has an interesting article about ratings by John Fithian, NATO's new President.Mr. Fithian notes that in 1999, only two of the top ten grossing films were rated R. Historically, only 8 of the top 50 grossing films were rated R. Fithian then says: "Yet, the majority of films produced today receive the R rating. In 1999 CARA rated 677 films, or which 470 received either an R or an NC-17 rating. Only 207 films rated in 1999 received a G, PG, or PG-13 rating." Fithian feels there is a need for more family-friendly films, but he "will fight tooth and nail against any attempts by any government to regulate what we can and can't exhibit". He then agrees with most of the posters here: "But with our freedoms comes responsibility. The rating system is one way to shoulder that responsibility, and it works well. Working with the MPAA, we provide parents with the information, we do our best to enforce the ratings at the boxoffice, and parents work to make informed decisions about the movies their children see". For those who haven't seen it, the MPAA now has a web site with complete searchable information about film ratings: http://www.filmratings.com ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|