|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Century H Heads
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
![](http://www.film-tech.com/ubbmembers/331cap.gif)
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 04-06-2000 06:02 AM
Start out by using a good resolution test film like the SMPTE Projector Alignment Film 35-PA (RP40). Rack through focus and observe what happens on the screen. As you move focus, does the focus point sweep across the screen? If so, the film is not perpendicular to the optical axis of the lens. Check the gate and lens mount alignment. If the focus point spreads out from the center as you rack focus, the film is cupping in the aperture. Try adjusting gate tension, and be sure the film path through the gate is not misaligned or "pinched". Another factor here may be excessive radiant energy or hot spotting in the gate. If the focus improves as you reduce power, heat is likely involved. Focus will be more of an issue with very short focal length lenses, especially those under about 40mm, because they have less "depth of focus". If you have plenty of light, consider a lens with a smaller f/number or internal stop to get better depth of focus. The newer lenses from Schneider or Isco usually have much better field flatness than older or off-brand lenses. If your lens is over 20 years old, use it for a paperweight, and get a lens of modern design. If the problem is only in scope, be sure you have adjusted the distance ring on the anamorphic adapter to minimize astigmatism. See the "Focusing Anamorphics" section in the Film-Tech "Tips". Ideally, you should be able to resolve 80 line pairs per millimetre in the center of the screen, and about 56 in the corners. Anything less than 40 lp/mm is unacceptable.
------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
![](http://www.film-tech.com/ubbmembers/268e.gif)
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 04-06-2000 04:25 PM
Bernie:It could be anything... It can be your lamphouse alignments (less likely but certainly has caused what you describe). The film is getting pinched in the trap (studio guides, are likely as is crud built up between the guide(s) and runner). Poor grade lenses, particularly on short focal lengths. If the problem is only on one format, say Scope, then you are closer to your problem. Setting a scope lens is often misunderstood...the Tips section here on Film-Tech tells an excellent way of setting the distance ring. If you are using B&L anamorphs, you have to constantly tighten/loosen the locking ring AS you adjust the distance ring so as to make it just snug until you find the best setting; then tighten securely. While changing the gates/traps over to the SA style is certainly an option and they will project the film better, it won't necessarily fix your problem. And as others have stated, it can be a bit pricey. Off of the top of my head, you would need the trap, gate, trap bracket, and light shield. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bernie Anderson Jr
Master Film Handler
Posts: 435
From: Woodbridge, New Jersey
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 04-07-2000 06:09 PM
Just to up date you, since there's so many responses, (thank you by the way). My throw is 100 feet on a moderate keystone with a screen about 35 feet wide. The lenses, yes are old, I don't remember the exact make, but I know they are German. The problem occurs on both machines, one slightly worse than the other. I also get it with scope too but not as bad as the flat. The flat lenses are newer than the scope ones. Lenses are on my list to get when the money comes around. The lamp houses are old Christie verticals. They're in pretty good shape and have been well kept. The thing is that any film that runns through the machine gives the same kind of image, soft on the edges and sharp in the middle. The oldest thing I ran in there was from 1959 and the newest was some trailers from a couple months ago and I had the same focus problem on both. The one tech I had look at it said that there wasn't enough tension in the gate. we tightend the spring in the gate knob, it was hardly holding the gate closed and still the same focus, even when I played with pressure adjustments you don't really see any variation. To me it seems like the film isn't sitting flat in the gate. Any thoughts?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!
![](http://www.film-tech.com/ubbmembers/145d.jpg)
Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 04-08-2000 09:38 PM
Bernie said: "The SA trap and gate (assembly) with work by just swaping out the parts? "Yes. I have done it to one of the very troublesome H heads in one of our booths. The only thing that will be required to do will be to cut new aperture plates, as the SA trap seems to have a slightly different centerpoint in the aperture plate slot. " Other than the new kelmar turrit conversion kit that I hear good things about, how much would new or used parts cost to convert it?" A new gate/trap assembly, complete with one undersize flat aperture plate cost us about $700. You will also need an SA-style light shield for behind the gate and aperture plates for any other formats you intend on showing on that machine.Used should be much less, and I am not sure of the Kelmar turret kit's price. Good Luck! Aaron
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|