|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Hello Joe What Da Ya Know?
|
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today
Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-09-2000 01:12 AM
Wow Mark, you really enjoy your Ultra, don't you? Anyway, I was just stating that the hiss was more audible on the Ultra's versus the Dolby's. We have QSC 1500a's in every auditorium with the gains set to max (except for some of the surround and sub amps where the processors can't be turned down low enough, and those are set to 12 o'clock). To be honest, I haven't heard any audible distortion coming out of the Ultra. Just noting that the hiss is more prevelant in the Ultra auditoriums.All of the Ultra auditoriums had (roughly) the same amount of hiss. All of the Dolby auditoiums were also identical to eachother in regards to hiss. You can't hear the hiss when there is noise in the room or people talking, non-sync music playing, just stating that there is more hiss than the Dolby's. I really don't think this is such a big issue. I'm sure the amps themselves contributed to the hiss, but that's a different review. I'm fairly certain that these units meet factory specs. But you can take comfort in knowing that I reviewed exactly what Ultra sends out, meaning you will get the same thing (if they still make these units... I think they have gone the way of the digital processor like the CP500, etc). Also, my reviews certainly are NOT written just so everyone can agree with them.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler
Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-09-2000 05:15 AM
Regarding the hissing problem in general, I have these thoughts. The most important thing to remember is that gain structure is very important to achieving the proper signal to noise ratio.In my younger and more naive days, I always recommended that amps be run wide open, and then the processor gains should be set for the proper auditorium level. The SOLE reason for doing this was so that if an amplifier died, it was very easy for anyone to replace since there would be no concern about setting the new amp's gain. Just turn it all the way up, and there you have it. This was even more of a concern for biamp systems where the gains needed to be precisely set. However, most processors have additional stages AFTER the fader, and these stages will always contribute SOME noise although it may be very little. If an amplifier has enough gain, this noise will be amplified to the point of audibility. Techs from the field began to tell me that this was not the optimum way to do things. So later on I started recommending that amplifier gains be set 6 to 10 dB lower and then turning up the processor ouput levels to achieve the proper levels. The hiss decrease is sometimes dramatic by doing this. The gain STRUCTURE has been changed to put the optimum amounts of gain at each point in the system. The equipment has to be looked at as a system where the parts are optimized to work together as well as possible. And regarding the comment about amps hissing, generally speaking amps are pretty quiet devices with S/N ratios around 100 dB or better, but do not be fooled, ALL electronic equipment has noise regardless of who makes it. The trick is to make sure every part of the system works at its best with every other part. Now I will grant you that some equipment may be measurably and audibly more noisey than others, but for the most part, current products are pretty good in respect of noise. It is best not to think that you can simply treat all equipment the same in terms of setup procedures, however. Be flexible a bit and learn what works best for each type of equipment you have, and then there should be less opportunity for complaint. I have talked with several techs who take this approach, and it is amazing what good performance they can get out of any manufacturer's equipment. ------------------ Oscar Neundorfer Chief Engineer SMART Devices, Inc. oscar@smartdev.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Walsh
Film God
Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 05-09-2000 08:43 AM
I also would prefer to see actual test measurements, like THD, S/N, gain over frequency, etc. I'm a phone company kind of guy, and if measurements aren't referenced to dBm's, I get cranky, and amps should be rated in RMS, not that silly IHF. But that does take time and money.I really like Joe's reviews for their practical "real-use" comments, which I think (ultimately) are of more use. Question for Joe: Do manufacturers give you stuff to test (that you send back), or are you doing your reviews on equipment that is being installed or is already installed?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today
Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-09-2000 06:45 PM
Who says I give any of the stuff back?Anyway, I understand why you guys would appreciate official specs and performance numbers. I am a tech head and love seeing those same numbers on paper, even if they don't make a noticeable difference in the real world. But keep these two things in mind: 1)These are not lab tests. These are all tested in the real world, working in a real booth and playing real films, not just test noise patterns, etc... 2)I do not have all of the equipment to administer such tests, cannot currently afford it, and do not currently have the time to perform those tests if I did have the equipment. Other than that, I hope everyone enjoys the reviews and finds them valuable. As far as leaving the amp gains wide open, I do agree with Oscar, but many times it isn't feasable. In our big house we cannot meet the analog subwoofer level with our CP500's out put cranked to the max. Even with the amp gains maxed out, it still falls short. Of course, digital subwoofer level is easilly acheived. If I could have my way, all amp gains would be set to 12 o'clock, but I can't do that. I also like standardization.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 05-09-2000 08:28 PM
My $.02...I think in the type of review as Joe does it really is one man's opinion based on personal experience and it should be taken as such. It isn't a quantitative analysis as you would expect from a magazine review. In the case of Ultra-Stereo's JS series, I have found without exception what I would term excessive hiss, regardless of gain structure. Just walking into the auditorium, you get assaulted by hiss as compared to say a current CP-500 or CP-65. The early CP-500's had the same problem. As far as distortion goes, I have yet to be in an auditorium Ultra Stereo equipped and not been able to tell that it was an Ultra processor (on analog...harder to tell for digital). Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-09-2000 09:09 PM
We've got 17 Ultra*Stereo at Cinemark. I like them pretty well but everything mentioned in the review seems pretty accurate to me.You can hear the hiss when the auditorium is quiet. They do have trouble switching between formats w/ DTS. AND they do blow a lot of power supply cards. I've only had one bad format card, though. I like them but I DO wish we had Dolby. To me it's like buying a cheap computer, or something like that... You CAN get a Pentium chip in a Packard-Bell, but wouldn't you rather have something like a Gateway? (Or whatever) Same goes for processors... Yes, Ultra*Stereo has SR decoding but wouldn't you rather have the original? PS: What do those Goldberg platter reels cost?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|