|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Projection Olympics?
|
Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!
Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-25-2000 07:56 PM
OK- this is one thing that gone thru my mind for a number of years, and I am gonna share it with the rest of you out there...This is an Olympic year, why not have the first annual Film-Tech Olympics? Film Techers the world over can compete in various film-tech related events and have a great time as well as prove (or disprove) their projection or technical prowess! All in fun, of course, as some of these things I am proposing are obviously not exactly the most 'kosher' things to do under a real booth condition, but I think it would be a great way to blow off a little steam and have a great time doing so Event ideas I have thought of include: -Timed platter threading from ring-in print to a picture on screen. Seconds deducted for misthreading, out-of-frame, bad loops, missed platter components, etc. -Timed projector fieldstripping, or timed projector reassembly(from a pile of parts(?)) or both: Points deducted for sloppiness or missing parts, or non functionality, etc -Timed xenon bulb changes (using a 'dummy' bulb for obvious safety reasons) -Timed Diode changes -DTS 'discus' throw -Timed print inspection/make-up/breakdown, in two divisions: Platters and 6000' reels: points deducted for sloppiness and other mistakes -(Team Event) Complete booth installation from boxed gear to operating booth picture and sound... points off for obviousl discrepancies... Any other ideas for events?? We could have the Olympics sometime in the summer, or maybe better yet suring ShoWest, where we could get the manufacturers and dealers to sponsor events with equipment or funds Just thought I'd toss this one in the air and see where it landed.... Aaron
|
|
|
|
Steve Kraus
Film God
Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-25-2000 08:54 PM
Sounds like fun but can you come up with some contests that are not based on time? Rushing through everything isn't necessarly a virtue in a profession that prides itself on quality.OK, now having said that I will promptly contradict myself by suggesting another timed event: Changeover projection using an old print that has been chopped into progressively shorter and shorter rolls (each leadered up and cued): 20 min, 10min, 5 min, 3min, 2min, 1min, 30 seconds etc. You're threading the next roll while the prior is running and changing over to it on time. Miss the change and you're out. I should also mention that I think I may have set a record this morning for setting up an unmarried 2-track LT/RT mag track. Poor client went to all this trouble to prep some film for a VIP screening (including cross country flights) only to find that they gave him a silent answer print...so I had to run interlocked mag on no notice with the client's audience due any moment. Change heads, set Dolby level, set up scope for X/Y, azimuth heads, set up analyzer, set EQ. All in about 4 minutes. Maybe that could be a PROJECTOLYMPICS event.
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 05-25-2000 09:05 PM
>>"OK, now having said that I will promptly contradict myself by suggesting another timed event: Changeover projection using an old print that has been chopped into progressively shorter and shorter rolls (each leadered up and cued): 20 min, 10min, 5 min, 3min, 2min, 1min, 30 seconds etc. You're threading the next roll while the prior is running and changing over to it on time. Miss the change and you're out."<<The "Changeover Limbo"....I like it! ;-) Steve PS, I haven't forgotten the other thread...the Baysox have been on a homestand and I haven't had the time to get back to it. ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
|
|
Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-26-2000 12:22 AM
THE MAIN EVENT!!!All competitors will have gone without sleep for 20 hours prior to the competition. This is a platter event. The participant can choose the platter and projector that they compete with. They will thread and play a two minute length of film as quickly as they can, repeatedly for 30 minutes. A scratch means you lose, period. Mistakes in loops will be tolerated so long as they do not cause presentation problems (jumping, etc). NO FILM GUARD!!! You must preserve the quality of your film with no outside help. Finally, as each contestant takes his turn, the others will be in the auditorium beating on the port glass! Obscenities will be allowed so long as they are "politically correct". The operator may not break down and return the obscenities. He/she must maintain thier composure and be a "pillar of the community" at all costs. Everyone jump in! Can this event BE any harder!!? Russ
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today
Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-26-2000 01:51 AM
How about these:-Timed alignment of a Christie basement Dolby Digital reader with a 6 month old LED and two year old belts so it read's 0's, 1's and 2's. Maximum time alloted: 5 minutes -EQ auditoriums by ear (accuracy will be checked with a THX R2 analyzer.) -Timed rewinding of media pads. -Competition to see who can change a xenon bulb mid-show and lose the least amount of light (all while the projector is running). -Threading of projectors while they are running. -Competition to see who can change out a bad Christie platter LED while the show is running and not cause a brainwrap or platter drop (must be done on a real movie with a real audience). -FilmGuard swallowing contest (who can drink the most bottles in 2 minutes?) -Sleeping contest. Who can enter the deepest sleep and ignore all manager and customer complaints, while all of the projectors running (but not correctly, of course)?
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-26-2000 02:25 AM
Joe, Joe, Joe...the olympics must be feasible. A Christie SRD basement reader with a 6 month old led in 5 minutes with a result of "2" or less on the error scale? IT CAN'T BE DONE! The EQing by ear would be interesting. There is a union man (retired now I belive) up north somewhere who could actually thread a machine while it was running. Wish I knew his name or the local's number. Anyone know this guy? Steve and Steve...I'll race ya. It's been 10 years since I've done any changeovers on a regular basis (outside of special screenings), but there's nothing like running previews alternating between 2 machines because the theater won't spring for a splicer! (You'll probably both still slaughter me on this one, but it would be fun.) Aaron Sisemore...there are no dummy xenons in use today, so I feel we should be using REAL 7000 watt xenons nice and hot fresh from being ran only minutes earlier for the olympics. Otherwise what's the fun? We used to do a smaller version of our own booth olympics back at Cinemark Vista Ridge in the late 80s. My favorite events were: *One handed threading. Yes, you have one hand tied behind your back and you must thread the entire platter AND projector IN FRAME. Whoever can do it the fastest with perfect loops and no mistakes wins. (I always won.) *Blind threading. Just like the above, but you get both hands, but no sight. Any out of frame startups is an automatic disqualification! (I only lost once.) *One handed and blind threading. Even more fun. Combine the two previous. No misframes! (Definitely difficult, but I can do it given enough time.) Other fun events that come to mind: *The interlock competition. Whoever can interlock all 30 screens at the local AMC with one print and NOT damage it in any way whatsoever with the quickest thread and setup time wins. *The minimal interlock competition. Who can set up an interlock system from scratch at the local AMC 30 plex with the LEAST amount of rollers wins. (Rollers mounted on the platter trees do not count towards your overall roller count, so use them creatively.) *The manual changeover competition. Whoever can run the most auditoriums without missing a single changeover or making a single mistake of any sort wins. Note: this will be ran on original 2000 foot shipping reels with absolutely NO automation of any sort, including failsafes. Only splicing together of the trailer presentations will be allowed. (Of course, I think we all know who will win this.) *The ADA competition. Who can run the most screens with platters while being restricted to a wheelchair. *The creative dubbing competition. Each person gets a print of "Dinosaur" and is to make a tape/cd of dialogue to be played through the center channel, while the other channels are played simultaneously off of the digital tracks. Most points are given to the most creative and perverted storyline. (We all know projectionists are perverted. ) *The PTR competition. Who can clean the booth floor best, armed only with two Kodak PTRs!
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-26-2000 07:23 AM
OK, how about:
- the "who needs reference frames" competition: you will be given a six-reel feature which you have never seen; all of the reels are unlabelled. Show the feature (your choice: small reels, large reels, or platters) in the proper order. You will be given thirty minutes of inspection/makeup time before the film must be on screen. Those who complete this round successfully will move on to the finals, where prints will have density tracks. - the drive-in/carbon-arc competition: you will be given two features, a short, and an intermission reel; show the entire double-feature using the least amount of carbons. Screen illumination will be judged by John Pytlak and the Screencheck inspectors and must not drop below 16fl. Whoever has the shortest average stub length wins. Carbon savers are allowed. - the "A-chain alignment" competition: you will be given one reel each of an Academy mono film and a Dolby Stereo film. Using only standard tools (no oscilloscope, no Dolby-tone film, no test loops), do an A-chain alignment on the soundhead of your choice by ear. Variation: 4-track 35mm and 6-track mag head alignments by ear. - the "who needs automation" competition: this should take place in a 30-plex. You will start showing films on all screens; automation systems will randomly be deactivated. You must continue to run all of the shows manually, without missing any cues, until all automation units have been deactivated and you are running the entire 30-plex manually. Whoever can run the most screens without automation and without errors wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|