|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Frying eggs on a CP200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Kilderry
Master Film Handler
Posts: 355
From: Melbourne Australia
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 06-30-2000 06:54 PM
Nick,I consider it could be one of a variety of cards. The processor is now 16 years old, but from memory we a few spare cards for the CP200 in the store. Is it only audible on optical film sound? If so I would not discount a static charge building and arcing across to the cell. As stated, test in bypass to start narrowing down the possibilities. David
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 06-30-2000 08:14 PM
Since it only happens on optical you are a good part of the way home as to finding the cause. Since it has been happening for 2 years you can safely eliminate you new reader as the cause as well.You didn't mention if it happens on Non-Sync or not. If it does, then there are only a couple of cards left or the DA-20 has a noisy connector from JM-11 or relay contact. If the problem is just on optical then we have narrowed the problem quite a bit. One thing to check is the solder connections on the card connectors mounted to the back plane. Rewet them and many strange intermittent problems will evaporate. What channel is it in? All or just one? The most likely suspect is the Cat 150 for most noise and only optical related in a CP-200 If you are running an older Cat. 108 (prior to the Cat. 108C) then you should upgrade as a matter of course (I doubt it is the source of you noise, but certainly possible, it is just that both projectors share rather little circuity on it). The Cat. 108C will match your new reader's (or narrow slit lens') response MUCH better. With the Cat. 108C you can expect a cleaner, quieter response and MUCH flatter in the high frequencies. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
Nick Perry
Film Handler
Posts: 19
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 07-01-2000 03:40 AM
Dear All,Gordon, Yes it does have Mag capabilities so that's another thing I will try as well as swapping over the C150. Interesting what Russ said about 3 conductor cable for each channel. If I get that desperate i'll do a rough cable run using that method and see how I go. Steve, it is not present in Non-sync. I don't think it's the DA20. I'll try to see if we have a 108C floating around. It's worth one anyway now with the improved HF response we get from the reverse scan. David, if none of these tests fixes the problem, static could be a viable answer. Anyone else had a static soundhead? One thing that recentlly occured to me is that the SRA5 could be faulty or not installed correctly. It does sound like i'm listening to A-type with little or no noise reduction. I didn't have time to investiagte this last time I was on but it's worth a look. The unit was put installed in 98 if I recall correctly. Anyway, thanks for all the feedback. I have plenty to try now next time i'm in. I'll keep you posted! Kind Regards, Nick
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-01-2000 08:34 AM
Since the noise is not in Non-Sync then you can safely eliminate all cards after the 2nd switch card.This will place the noise problem between the 1st and 2nd switch cards. So what is left? Cat. 22s, Cat. 109Cs, the SRA-5 and related wiring, Special 1 (and possible poor soldering for SRA-5 modification, Cat. 160 (could be putting noise on the Lt, Rt lines), Cat. 150 (often is the source of noise problems, if yours is a Cat. 150C or earlier, then upgrade to Cat. 150F as a matter of course for improved decoding and quieter) and finally Special 2 (again, possible poor solder joints). Knowing which channels the noise is in will help isolate the problem further. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|