|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Carmike Files Chapter 11
|
|
|
Andrew Poulain
Film Handler
Posts: 13
From: San Rafael, CA, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 08-08-2000 04:55 PM
This is quoted from Reuters newswire:Carmike Cinemas Inc. (CKE), the No. 3 U.S. movie theater operator, said Tuesday it filed to reorganize its businesses under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy code. "We determined that Chapter 11 provides the most expeditious means to achieve a successful financial and operational restructuring of our business," chief executive Michael Patrick said in a statement. "Our focus is on preserving our assets and improving our operational strength during the difficult period for our industry." Earlier this month, Columbus, GA.,-based Carmike, which operates 2821 movie screens in 447 theatres, said its lenders prevented it from making a payment under its 9.375 percent senior subordinated notes maturing in Febuary 2009 because it had technically defaulted under two credit lines and a master lease facility. Carmike's shares were up 1/8 at 2-1/16 in early afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange. the stock has traded between 1-5/16 and 14 in the last year.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 08-08-2000 08:38 PM
The two Carmike theatres in my location are almost opposites of each other when it comes to maintenance and projection quality. The Huntsville location, the Carmike 10, had been well maintained, for the most part, and still looks new and in good condition. Presentation quality is very good there.However, the Carmike 8 in Decatur, 20 or 25 miles away, is like "the dark side of the force". During the past few years, that location has let its projection quality slip to abysmal levels. The cosmetic condition of the facility leaves a lot to be desired and the last time I was in there, I felt as if my shoes were going to irretrievably lost, permanently stuck to the floor (exaggerating a slight bit). The place was built in 1982 by Fairlane/Litchfield, taken over by United Artists in 1987, and by Carmike in 1990. I have been complaining about the ridiculously sloppy presentation there and in April, a new manager was put there and he has improved the projection considerably, but he can only do so much. Theatres like this one really give Carmike a bad name. I have been told by a Carmike manager that the Carmike locations in Cullman and Florence were just as bad or worse than the Decatur one. Ugh. If Carmike lets all their smaller, older theatres run down like this, they deserve to go bankrupt. I've been tempted to go check out some of the older Carmikes in Nashville to see what they're like, but I haven't. The question is, how is the filing of chapter 11 going to affect their operations? I wonder if they'll close any theatres. I wish they'd either build a new theatre in Decatur (like Huntsville's Carmike 10) and close that dump they have there, and if they can't do that, I feel that handing movie exhibition over to someone who cares more else would be the most appropriate thing to do.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 08-09-2000 08:53 AM
Do you think that if the major chains all get into financial trouble, that things may return to the days of having smaller, more localized theatre companies, or do you think there will be eventually one main company that runs nearly all the theatres in the country?I've done quite a bit of research on the old theatres in my area back to the 1920s and it was often the case that a theatre was owned by one person, or sometimes a small number of theatres would be owned by one person. Back before all of the major chains moved in, there were companies like Rosenbaum Theatres, Crescent Amusement Company and United Amusements that owned several theatres (all single-screen indoor or drive-in originally, with some twinning in the middle and late 1970s) in the area. Any predictions for the future regarding theatre companies? To me, it seems that the first logical step would be for the chains to close their least profitable locations, along with locations that need expensive maintenance to keep the building in proper condition. Locations such as these detract from the entire image of a company, since many people judge a company by how the company's local facilities appear and function. If I judged the entire Carmike chain by the Carmike Century Cinema 8 in Decatur, AL, I wouldn't bother to set foot in any Carmike theatre. If I judged them by the Carmike 10 in Huntsville, I'd seek out a Carmike theatre anywhere I went. It would be advantageous for Carmike to rid itself of their many "warts" such as the Decatur location that hurt the image of the whole company, and would save them a lot of money on maintenance that will eventually be needed. I suspect that if something else happens there, such as the climate control system failing and needing an expensive repair, that place may close. One manager told me that the next time the lease was up, they might just let it go. Another manager told me they had no plans to close the location. It shows that information from staff or managers is not very reliable. I really would hate for one chain to end up owning and operating all of the theatres in the country. It would be almost as bad as every restaurant being a McDonalds. I like a variety of architectures, decorations, layouts, and styles of operation in different theatres. That is what makes individual theatres interesting. Evans Theatre Information Page: http://home.hiwaay.net/~criswell/theatre/
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dave Cutler
Master Film Handler
Posts: 277
From: Centennial, CO
Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 08-09-2000 11:28 AM
AFAIK, All of the major players are in trouble. There is a short post in the ground level about AMC which I posted on. Basically the Kansas City Star reported that AMC has a 25% chance of defaulting on its dept. Then of course there is always UA, hanging on the edge but not giving in.I agree that all the majors need to "trim the fat" from the industry. They also need to STOP BUILDING. The US is terribly over saturated with theatres as it is. They need to slow it down, make some money and then move forward. Maybe filling Chapter 11 is the answer. Dickinson Theatres Inc here in the midwest filled chapter 11 a couple of years ago, restructured their home office, stopped building, shut down crappy theatres, and now they are doing better than ever and building state of the art 12+ plex's while turning a profit.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 08-09-2000 12:54 PM
Both Regal and Carmike, instead of building so many new theatres, making their financial problem worse in the long run, should have been maintaining and improving the theatres they already had. Instead of building a new 16 screen theatre near Birmingham, Regal should have put adjustable masking on the 2/3 of the screens that lack it in the theatres they bought from Cobb in 1997 and implemented quality checking and control procedures to keep their quality of presentation as high as possible. Carmike, instead of building so many theatres in Nashville, should have made sure they could maintain the projection equipment and buildings they already had. In general, I'd say that when a company expands to the point that they cannot effectively maintain their facilities because of complexity issues, or financial reasons, their fall will be coming soon. It sound like the next few months will be interesting to observe in terms of theatre companies and their restructuring and reorganizing efforts. Evans
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|