Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » NEW, LOWER DTS DRIVE KIT PRICE (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: NEW, LOWER DTS DRIVE KIT PRICE
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 12:46 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Got my updated DTS price sheets last Friday and noticed that the new price on the drive retrofit kits are substantially lower than they were. The 2 drive kit has a new LIST PRICE of 435.00, and the new LIST PRICE on the 3 drive kit is 608.00. These are still allot of money for something that was supposed to last a long time but at least DTS has made some headway here.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Rory Burke
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Burbank, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-14-2000 02:43 PM      Profile for Rory Burke   Email Rory Burke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For what it is worth....I think that those drive are quite reliable and durable. I think the fact that they are constantly spinning and looking for data coupled with the aggresive theater schedule really brings their total hours operating capacity down to reality. Perhaps my cdrom drives in my pc dont get the use but those DTS drives are always on and spinning. That ends up adding up to alot of hours in the end. Maybe there might be truth in to this I dont know...hard to imagine that those drive are just bad quality to begin with.

Rory

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-14-2000 02:55 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rory:

Good observation. Having something work reliably 12+ hours a day, 365 days a year, is a challenge, especially for something as delicate as a disk drive. Unfortunately, the only "repair" is often buying a new one.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 03:09 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm...here's a thought for DTS: why not include a smallish hard drive in each DTS unit? Three discs would take up no more than 2 gigs, so an 8-gig IDE drive ($150 or so) should hold enough soundtrack information for four separate films. If the DTS unit were smart enough to copy the data on the discs to the hard drive on the first show of a given film, subsequent shows could be played back from the hard drive instead of the discs, which would save wear on the CD drives (which aren't built very reliably, whereas hard drives last several years). Obviously, this would only be useful if the same movie were being shown repeatedly in a given auditorium, but the cost seems low enough that it might be a worthwhile addition, which would also help to solve the problem of users who neglect to change discs when playing two different features.

 |  IP: Logged

Rory Burke
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Burbank, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-14-2000 03:14 PM      Profile for Rory Burke   Email Rory Burke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can see it now... The next future thread titles:

"DTS hard disk plays wrong movie track!! HELP!"
-lost one nowhere,USA

Wasnt there a thread where leaders' timecode were mimicking and forcing the DTS units to play?

RORY

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 03:15 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, what a fantastic and incredibly simple idea!

Hopefully DTS will take note of that. With a small drive, they could even set it up to be able to handle TWO features and a trailer disc loaded up at once into the hard drive. That way, the operator wouldn't have to remember to keep switching the discs when there is a double up in one auditorium.

I wonder if that couldn't be an add-on option that could hook into one of the slots on the back side with a single rack mount space holding the new hard drive. Surely that would be no more than buying a new drive kit and would perform better as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 03:28 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To expand on the earlier post, here's what I'm thinking about the DTS idea:

requirements: the idea here is to save wear on the CD drives and improve reliability while making everything totally transparent to the user. Presumably DTS units could be built with, say, 8-gig IDE disks as standard equipment, each of which could have four 2-gig partitions (since DTS runs DOS and, presumably, FAT filesystems, the 2gig partition limit applies). Each disk partition could represent enough space for a single program (defined as trailer disc plus feature discs).

When you play a given film, the DTS reader sees the timecode and the DTS player compares the timecode with its own local mini-database to see if the timecode for that movie exists on its local hard disk. If it does exist, then the DTS unit plays the movie soundtrack directly from hard disk without looking at the CDs at all. If the movie's soundtrack is not on the internal hard disk, then the DTS unit plays the soundtrack off the CDs and copys the information from the CDs over the oldest (longest time since last use) disk image so that the next showing of that movie can be done from hard drive.

The beauty of this is that it doesn't require operator intervention, other than the usual disc-changing ritual that is done now and it can even compensate for someone who forgets to change the discs if the disc-less movie has played recently in the same auditorium. Since the DTS unit can play the soundtrack off the CDs in real time, there is no need for the operator to consciously transfer the information from CDs to hard disk. If the soundtrack is on the hard disk, the DTS unit plays it from that source; if it is not, it plays from the CDs. If the hard disk fails, it can fault to reading from CD.

All of this rests on the assumption that the timecode values are unique to each print, which may not be the case. Perhaps there should be a mechanism for the operator to over-ride the default to play from the hard drive in the unlikely event that he has two films with the same timecode track.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 03:58 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Would the hard drive be able to seek like the cd player? If the film were broke and fixed there would be a problem I would think. Is the HD seek time as fast as the CD? I guess you could rerecord the cd during the spliced film's first run. Does the HD have the same fidelity capabilities? Just wondering

------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 08-14-2000 04:52 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, your idea is so good, there must be a reason why they didn't do it already! It's probably a marketing reason, rather than a techinal limitation.

I would buy one, if they offered it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 05:01 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sure they didn't do it because of the cost.

Going by what replacement parts cost: Since a hard drive costs something like $200, if they added one to the machine, it would add about $5000 to the price of the unit, so no wonder they didn't do it. It'd make the thing more expensive than Dolby and then what would be the point?

[please reset sarcasm detectors now]


 |  IP: Logged

Dave Cutler
Master Film Handler

Posts: 277
From: Centennial, CO
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-14-2000 05:08 PM      Profile for Dave Cutler   Email Dave Cutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scotts idea sounds similar to what IMAX uses for their newest soundsytem. They load the soundtrack for the show onto a harddrive, tell the show program what file to play, and don't have to think about it again. Very nice. I thought it was very cool when I was actually sent a IMAX soundtrack with a trailer and it was shipped on a DVD-ROM. Too bad a couldn't use it.

The DTS-P8 (8 channel DTS) can use a harddrive, although I have never seen one. My DTS-P8 uses two CD-ROM drives, but I really wish that it had a nice big harddrive.

About the original topic. The price of a DTS upgrade kit would depend heavily on your supplier. Different suppliers can offer different prices, it depends on how much business they do with DTS.


 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 05:29 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually thats a darn good idea. It would seem easy to copy the disks over to a removable SCSI hard drive at a work station and then simply plug the SCSI drive into the player in place of one of the CD ROM drives and boot up the player in the normal way. I suppose that there is probably something in the ROM DOS that would keep it from being this easy.....Hey Scott what do you think?
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 05:41 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Data rates and sound quality shouldn't be an issue. Remember that a DTS CD-ROM holds about 600 megs of information and runs for over an hour of film (witness the number of 90-minute movies that come with only one disc). Let's be conservative and assume a data rate of 10 megs/minute. That's nothing...you can do that over 10Mbps ("slow") ethernet. If standard CD-ROM drives can keep up at that rate, then a cheapo IDE hard disk should be able to deal with it easily and there should be no loss of sound quality.

I suppose that there could be a way to manually load the CD contents onto the hard disk, but that would take away from the simplicity and convenience of the "look for the sound on hard disk; if it's not there, play it from CD and then copy to the hard disk" approach.

Removable hard drives might work, but, for the same reason of simplicity, probably aren't such a great idea in a typical theatre environment. First, there's the problem of fragility: do you really want an 18-year-old popcorn-popper/"projectionist" who can't keep the port glass clean to be running around the booth with fragile electronic equipment? Also, there's the reliability issue: hard drives last longest when they are kept spinning. In general, repeatedly power-cycling a given drive will speed the wear on the bearings and cause premature failure. That would defeat the entire purpose of this concept, which is intended to improve the reliability of DTS.

One "issue" that did occur to me was the problem of having multiple soundtracks for a given movie. It probably is not uncommon for areas with large numbers of foreign-language speakers to run the same print with different soundtrack discs in different languages. I don't know of the best way to accommodate this in the system that I'm proposing. Maybe there should be some code on the CDs to indicate whether the sound on the CD matches the optical track on the film (different timecode could be used for different optical tracks); if the sound on the CD is different from the sound on the optical track, then perhaps the system should not attempt to copy the CD to the hard drive...

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2000 07:03 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, The only reason that I brought up the removable SCSi drive idea was that it might be something thats easily adaptable to present units.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 08-14-2000 08:30 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Awesome idea!! No more trailers not in DTS. If the trailer was on the last disc, it will still be on the HD more than likely. Excellent!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.