Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » The Technicolor Exhibitor Manual: The full story

   
Author Topic: The Technicolor Exhibitor Manual: The full story
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-28-2000 12:29 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is a letter we just received from Mary Ann Grasso of NATO:

To: All NATO members

RE: Important new tool from Technicolor

As you may recall, this time last year NATO conducted a member-wide survey about Technicolor Entertainment Delivery Systems. The survey was very helpful in revealing areas in which communication between Exhibition and TES could be improved.

Technicolor Entertainment Services was very open to the concerns expressed by NATO members in the survey and have introduced several new improvements in both communication and service.

One important improvement resulting from the survey is the development of an Exhibitor Guide that will serve as a user manual for the Technicolor print delivery system. The Guide will consist of a three-ring notebook with information on Marketing Services, Managed Print Movements, and Billing and is designed to answer commonly asked questions.

We are pleased with the development of this important tool and, most especially, with the spirit of cooperation and partnership with which it was developed.

The TES Exhibitor Guide is destined for shipment to theatres beginning on or around September 13th. So, watch your mailbox.

-------------------------------

Well isn't this nice. I would like to know what the "several new improvements" are. A smaller gorilla stomping on the film cans?


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-28-2000 03:57 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
If memory serves, the two major complaints were:

#1 Send the prints in 2 days prior
#2 Stop using broken reels

I remember sending in a huge packet of printouts of the threads here to Mary Ann on behalf of the members of Film-Tech. Good to know it wasn't a waste of time or anything.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 08-28-2000 08:34 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, yes: a three-ring binder will fix all those problem. Dear me, why didn't I think of that. Of course, it's the *theaters* that are wrong, so let's distribute documentation to show them the error of their ways....

I don't think TES will significantly change their mode of operation, and no one is gonna make them. Also, NATO is effectively useless. I know several people who have worked damn hard for NATO causes, and I don't mean to belittle their work, but they just can't seem to really accomplish much. (Hey, just my own opinion, so don't get upset!)

Now, if we could get Jack Valenti to work for NATO instead of MPAA, then something might get done. If he can get a president into office....

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 08-29-2000 12:52 AM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder if the binders will be made from the same material as Technicolor reels.

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-29-2000 04:49 AM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If we actually find any improvements, it will be quite shocking.
Broken reels are perhaps my biggest pet peeve when it comes to what happens to a print before it arrives at the theaters. Though in that matter, I spend more time taking apart and reassembling reels that Warner Bros ships their films on them than anything shipped by TES. Go figure.

I got a good laugh one Thursday this summer. I can't remember which film it was off the top of my head, but it had been shipped via TES... When I cracked open one of the cans, I found that the interior had been defaced in black indelible ink with this: 'Technicolor Sux'

~GLB

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-30-2000 02:27 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, ONE benefit of the 'book' will be when Technicolor finally gets a print on your doorstep 10 min. AFTER showtime, you can say, "It's here in black and white that you said it would be delivered at XYZ."

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-31-2000 01:44 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been thinking about this. I wonder how many responses NATO got when they asked for input about TES?

There's always the possibility that "management" in some locations got hold of the letter requesting input, and tossed it...so the poor projectionist didn't get a chance to respond!

John P... you know people in the biz, right? Isn't there somebody you can call, a friend of a friend maybe, to let some of the higher-ups know what's REALLY going on with TES? Or is it true that "the suits" really DON'T care about presentation, as long as they get their film rent on time?

It just floors me that the only response they could come up with to all the problems we reported was a f#$%ing BINDER. Sheesh.

I hope Maryann Grasso is at our regional convention coming up in 2 weeks (she usually is) I'm definitely going to bend her ear about this.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-31-2000 06:14 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I plan on presenting the concerns around trailer leaders/packaging at the Inter-Society and SMPTE Projection Technology meetings being held at ShowEast. Likewise, the advantages of earlier print delivery schedules (not "just in the nick of time") and more theatre accountability for print damage are worth bringing up.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 08-31-2000 11:14 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken L. is right; the binders are good for leaning up against the broken reels to get the film off...

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Huff
Film Handler

Posts: 69
From: Springfield, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-31-2000 05:45 PM      Profile for Mark Huff   Email Mark Huff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that if we are to be responsible for payment if the print is damaged. Tes should be responsible for payment to the theatres for lost customers due to late delivery or any one of the many TES foul-ups.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.