|
|
Author
|
Topic: 70mm Prints In Indy ETS
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 09-07-2000 07:52 AM
I'm sure there are other 70 mm "gems" in exchanges around the world, waiting to be shown again. With proper promotion, they should do pretty good business, even though these films have been available on video for years. Put them on your biggest screen, and get the local press involved in promoting the "Splendor of 70 mm" again --- see the film as it was meant to be seen, on a BIG bright screen with six tracks of sound.Any Kodak print made since Kodak introduced lower fade dye technology in print film in 1982 should have minimal fading. Older triacetate prints may have a bit of shrinkage or vinegar smell if they were stored improperly, because the solvents and iron oxide used in magnetic striping can aggravate vinegar syndrome. Physical wear-and-tear and track degradation are the only remaining concerns, so anyone booking a 70 mm print should try to project and inspect it well ahead of any public showings. Anyone showing 70 mm features should post the information here, and share their experiences. If you have first-hand knowledge of the location and condition of any 70 mm prints, post them by title on the Film-Tech "Feature Info & Trailer Attachments" forum, so others can know which prints to specifically request. I'll get the ball rolling by copying and collating posts that have already been made regarding specific 70 mm prints. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 09-08-2000 08:32 AM
The "missing piece" is whether the added cost of a 70 mm print will result in selling more tickets. Kodak sells 70 mm print film for about twice the price of 35 mm print film, as you might expect. But 70 mm is still a low volume item at the few labs that handle it, using more labor-intensive slower printers and processing machines, so their costs are greater than 2X. Add the cost of making a 65 mm duplicate negative, which would be prorated over the number of prints. Magnetic striping and sounding added significant cost and hassle, and the significant investment required to upgrade solvent recovery systems to meet new environmental regulations for a relatively small volume has caused most companies to shut down their striping operations. Fortunately, 70 mm DTS works very well, and uses the same disks as 35 mm, but current printers still require two passes through the printer to print the picture, and then the timecode.Success stories like Gordon McLeod's (sell-outs of 70 mm "Titanic" all summer, after other theatres have been playing it for six months)give ample proof that audiences appreciate and seek out superior presentation. Some European exhibitors (e.g., Kinepolis, Coliseum Norway, UK Odeon) subsidize the making of 70 mm prints for their "flagship" theatres, knowing that it will more than pay for itself. I hear that you could see a 70 mm print of "The X-Men" in Europe, but not anywhere in North America. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Kilderry
Master Film Handler
Posts: 355
From: Melbourne Australia
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 09-08-2000 07:09 PM
Each year I run a "get to know 70mm" day here for technical managers and projection staff that were not around when fat film was king.Last year we ran a morning that included 70mm spools of the following: "A Star Is Born" - Streisand, w/s blow-up "Cobra" - Stallone, blow-up "Khartoum" - Ultra Panavision 70, "Star" - Julie Andrews, TODD-AO various THX and some of our company logos. We run it all in a THX auditorium on Bauer 35/70 U3's. Processor is CP 200. We convert the projectors, align the lenses and then sit back and listen to the glorious 6 track sound and watch the crisp (65mm neg) focus. See a photo at: www.drive-insdownunder.com.au/projectionbooths/vccbox.htm David
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 09-11-2000 07:09 AM
David Kilderry said: "Each year I run a "get to know 70mm" day here for technical managers and projection staff that were not around when fat film was king."That's a GREAT idea!!! I think one reason the "suits" and bookers don't seem to try very hard to get 70 mm prints is that they often aren't aware of how much better 70 mm prints look on a very large screen, compared to 35 mm, even for "blow ups". Seeing the quality "first hand" also allows them to PROMOTE and ADVERTISE the 70 mm shows as well, which is needed to really get the audience the format deserves. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|