|
|
Author
|
Topic: Film-Guard for archive prints ?
|
Florian Pausch
Film Handler
Posts: 11
From: Wien, Austria
Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 10-14-2000 12:49 PM
Hello, Brad,reading the posts about FG and its incredible effects on prints in "commercial" use (mass prints running regularily in the film theatres), I have two questions: 1. Would you recommend the use of FG on archive prints / are there any long-time tests regarding dye-fading etc ? (We had to recognise, that prints that had been "treated/waxed...." for second and third runs 20 or 30 years ago had suffered much more dye-fading than prints that had not been regenerated) 2. FG on nitrate stock ?????? Thanks, and congratulations for this wonderful site, best wishes from Vienna... Flo ------------------ Florian Pausch projectionist and technician Filmarchiv Austria,Vienna www.filmarchiv.at fpausch@aon.at
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-17-2000 06:26 AM
Films that are irreplacable or archival should NOT be treated with any chemical. It is very difficult to predict adverse effects that may occur after many years. For example, in the 1950's, many negatives were treated with lacquers to cover scratches -- decades later, many of these lacquer coatings have deteriorated, and cannot be removed without permanently damaging the film. SMPTE Recommended Practice RP131 specifies "Storage of Motion Picture Films". Films with long-term value need to be processed and washed such that there is no residual chemistry (e.g., retained thiosulfate or incorrect pH cause dye fading). They should NOT be treated with any chemicals. In general, films should be stored in cool and dry conditions. Because acid vapors can be formed during storage, film should NOT be stored in sealed containers so the acid vapors can vent, or should be stored with materials that adsorb moisture and acid vapors (e.g., Molecular Sieves). Periodic careful winding and inspection help "vent" any acid buildup, and reduce risk of ferrotyping or film deformation. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 10-17-2000 01:06 PM
I did use the term 'release prints' in my earlier post, referring to the collection of viewing copies of material being preserved which many archives maintain for screening in rep cinemas, in festivals and for research use. Remember that archives aren't just about preservation, but also about access, which is where these viewing copies come into play.Archival release prints, therefore, are not preservation elements and therefore are not subject to the conservation regime under which preservation elements would be kept. However, they're a lot rarer and more expensive to replace than a run of prints of a new title being circulated by a distributor, and so archives normally impose stricter rules on their use. For example, the UK National Film and Television Archive has quite a detailed set of rules, which include conditions such as not cutting the heads and tails off each reel, only handling the prints with cotton gloves and 'not attempting any repair or treatment' on the prints without their permission. They wax all their prints but I'm not aware of any archive using a cleaning agent such as Filmguard on them. Needless to say, no properly run archive would even contemplate letting a preservation element out for projection under any circumstances.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler
Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-17-2000 02:04 PM
I'm screening an archive print right now. The Swedish Film Institute doesn't have the resources to make separate release prints so I always run their "preservation elements".God knows that some of their preservation elements would need some kind of treatment. My early show tonight was a forty-year old print of "The Seven-Year Itch". Every minute of the age of that film was on screen, and they don't have any other print. Now, presumably they won't allow the screening of their oldest or most valuable material, but I've screened some pretty rare films in my time. I always wonder how long those prints will last. But in spite of this strange policy they rarely allow us to screen their 70mm prints. Not because they are considered to be "preservation elements", not because they are too brittle, but because they think most of them are too red in colour...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|