|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Cyan sound tracks and SR
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-06-2001 04:35 PM
Darryl,There is nothing inherent about using SR noise reduction with cyan tracks. The general technical reason is that the cyan track, with a red reader, if everything is optimized will be 2dB noisier than a high-magenta track using the same red reader. And all of this is on top of the increased noise/distortion from using the red reader and non-conventional track. Since the optical soundtrack isn't really a quiet track to begin with, each step down in noise quality is more noticable. Using SR noise reduction makes it less objectionable. The cyan track is still going to be noisier than the redeveloped tracks with or without SR noise reduction. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 02-07-2001 09:10 AM
Because a new sound negative would need to be made to optimize the performance of the cyan dye track, limited re-releases of older color films would likely use the existing sound negative and still have dye+silver tracks, which are compatible with both white light and red LED readers. Obviously, black-and-white films would still have silver tracks.Ideally, prints are properly recycled, so the silver is recovered. But many prints end up in landfills or are incinerated without recovering the silver. Silver is a heavy metal, and release of silver salts to the environment is regulated. Also, soundtrack application and wash-off uses significant amounts of fresh water, which is becoming a precious commodity. Cost savings come mostly from the elimination of waste caused by improper soundtrack developer application. Anyone who has visited a motion picture lab and watched the viscous soundtrack developer being applied to the track area and washed off with jets of water on processing machines running hundreds of feet per minute usually comes away amazed it works at all! ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|