|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: the end of projectionist trade?
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-20-2001 04:28 PM
It's hard to tell what system, if any, will replace film projection. Obviously, whatever system that winds up being, will have to be more desirable in all concerned aspects, rather than just one or two. In other words it's "package" must be more attractive than film's "package". It might not be the current crop of video projectors that overthrows film. Those of us who were around in the 50's might recall how "our friend the atom" was going to do just about everything for us, cheaper and better. Well we got down that road away and found out there were "some problems" and so that idea slipped by the wayside, along with jet packs, so you could fly to work, or flying cars. Watch those news reels (I think they're from Popular Science) and you'll see a whole pile of predictions about how life will be, way up in the year 1980 or so. Quite a laugh. All this digital everything is all exciting and "buzzy", but that doesn't mean that there won't be a deadend to it too, somewhere down the road. There is a possibility it will "win", but not a certainty. Personally, I think they'll have to go away, before they'll find a "package" that will beat film's "package".------------------ Greg Mueller Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron Haney
Master Film Handler
Posts: 265
From: Cupertino, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 03-21-2001 08:02 AM
With digital cinema, instead of a projectionist, theaters will likely need a sysadmin to keep things running. That will probably end up being more expensive, not less, than the way things are now, at least as far as theaters are concerned.I see a lot of people using the terms DLP and "digital cinema" interchangably. Digital cinema does not necessarily mean DLP. Weren't people saying in other threads that, based on the demos at ShoWest, JVC's D-ILA technology is already superior? And then there's laser projection probably coming in the not too distant future. DLP does not have everything all sewn up by any means (I hope). John, I agree that TI's slogan "see the picture, not the film" is an unfair slight. How about a little truth in advertising ... "see a bunch of over-sized pixels, not the film".
|
|
Darryl Spicer
Film God
Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 03-21-2001 10:24 AM
There will be a projectionist in some capasity for some while now. These things are not going to take over overnight. The projection trade is almost gone anyway. But that does not mean film can not be done right. I am non union and I care about everything that goes on in my booth. I train everyone who works in my booth. I wish I could maintain all the booths in town. Even when film is gone someone still has to have the training and knowledge to maintain the new equipment on site. This has to be the way because it takes the stress off of the manager in keeping his screens up and running. Nothing is perfect and problem free in any technology. I think learning some of this knew technology would be interesting. But the technology needs to be the best it can be and not require upgrades for at least ten years before I will consider it right for it to effect my job. I do not think our industry the exhibitors should accept that either. I have been doing this a long time, not as long as some of you in here, but long enough to know what people want. People like to be able to hear their movie without being blown out of their seats. They like their movie in focus. That is the two most comon complaints. Only a couple of times has anyone complained about scratches. It was on a movie I had received in that condition and was unable to get a replacement print. Only once have I heard anyone complain about seeing dirt on the picture. I was watching Independance Day at one of the other theaters. It was having shedding problems and during the desert scenes it looked like a black speck invasion.
The one thing that I see could be the most anoying thing in the new dlp technology is some of the little tiny mirrors becoming defective causing the black continuous specks in the picture no matter what you are showing. THese chips are probably the most expensive things in the unit to replace. My point being we the exhibitor must be wise in our decisions before making this jump. People may not really care at all. They are the ones that are going to be hit with even higher ticket and concession prices.
The people I feel the most sorry for are those who run their on smaller chains who enjoy doing this buisiness who will not be able to afford the new technology and all the drive-ins that will shut down because they can not get the propper light levels and pictures on the screen to look right because of the long distances and size of the screens. People at DTS who will not be making DTS units because the digital signal will be with the downloads. Just a lot of sad faces I see in our future. It makes my heart hurt. Just a note I have edited this post so it can be read more easily. Sorry about any spelling errors. For the record I do not drink. This was all written in a concious state.
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 03-21-2001 10:46 AM
IMHO, digital cinema technology will continue to improve, especially with regard to resolution, color reproduction, and contrast ratio. But there are many unanswered questions about who will pay, and if it will really produce overall savings and better quality in the real world.------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|