|
|
Author
|
Topic: comments about the speco makeup table reviews.
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 04-15-2001 03:24 PM
I have used both and (not picking on you Sean) as for an original design, just look how many platters all have the same basic design in general. The old standard Christie MUT (they have a new one now) is very simple, reliable and there isn't much of anything I would change if it was my call. SPECO has done an excellent job with their new table, as it performs just like the Christie does...and I like that! My major beef with the old SPECO MUTs was the fact that I never saw one with keeper rollers. No way in hell would I run film over them at varying twists and turns without those keepers! Fortunately, the district manager at the time (about 12 years ago) was officed in the booth and saw my concern and generously ordered them. I then no longer had any real issues with the older style MUTs. However, a vertical design is MUCH more desirable for many reasons. Most importantly, the film barely twists at all, you can put an overloaded reel of film on the spindle and not worry about having 4 hands as Ian pointed out and you can even use 16,000 foot reels on them (load only, never for breakdown). In a pinch, paying out to a sold out house direct off of the MUT to save the half hour or so of loading time saved me many times.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-16-2001 12:15 AM
I prefer using the bones of the old CFS tables. They are a pile of crap, this is true. But I have modified some of ours by building a new table top, and re-locating the spindles so it makes a nice portable film building bench, as well as being capable of handling 2 each 6,000 foot reels. I also made them electrically compatible to the platters they were being used with. After the projectionists used them, they liked them so well that they put the remaining tables (SPECO, XETRON, and STRONG) behind the screen somewhere to collect cobwebs.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-24-2001 04:36 PM
I received this via email. It concerns the LP270 Old review.Ian fair enough, it totally sucks. But there is tension on the payout spindle. The mechanism is not brilliant but it does work if adjusted correctly. I repaired a pair about 2 months ago. both payouts were, like the review one I expect, totally freewheeling. This is not good when combined with the horizontal reel. It's not good with a vertical reel either, but spinning back from the floor is better than dealing with a ring of film on the table. I had never seen one before, and just got curious about the spring on the payout shaft assembly. Designed by someone apparently unfamiliar with friction, it isn't immediately obvious how it should work. Anyway, just to be fair it does have a (poor) tension system. Still crap though. 1) One needs to remove the takeup drive thingy (plate? shaft?) to remove the top and change the light bulb, clean the powerstat, or access contraband stored inside. 2) The drive thingy is not keyed to the stub shaft, so skill is required when attaching it so as to avoid eventually sawing through the motor stub shaft with the setscrew. (see #1) The setscrew must also be regularly tightened or it will cut a ring sooner or later. 3) The feed spindle tension is poorly designed and cannot be adjusted during use. 4) The fuseholder is a piece of crap and luckily is also used on some old crap in the back so I don't have to try and find new caps yet when they break. DW Macaulay dwmacaulay@home.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|