Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Downtown Toronto Drive-In (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Downtown Toronto Drive-In
Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 05-18-2001 03:35 PM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From another list.....

>>>The Docks is a huge (21 acres) entertainment complex, featuring a nightclub, batting cages, indoor / outdoor volleyball, etc. The drive-in will actually be in the same space used as a golf driving range during the day.
This is right downtown on the waterfront.

BIG new SCREEN! 65'x135'. The operator claims it is the biggest in North America. Room for 470 cars! It's scheduled to open June 15.<<<

So what I'm wondering is just what kind of lamp they'll be using and am interested to know how they'll combat ambient light in downtown Toronto (though it's probably a little darker down on the water).Any of our Toronto locals know anything about it? When's the last time anybody built a drive- in near a major metropolitan area, let alone smack-dab in the middle? Interesting....


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-18-2001 03:41 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They better be using 70mm prints for that size screen! If they can somehow have the screen facing Lake Ontario, there's a chance they could keep the stray light in control. And for that size screen, they may be planning to use a high gain screen, and restrict the viewing angle. Keep us up to date on this interesting project.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 05-27-2001 07:33 PM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, more bad news as far as the technical side goes. Besides a difficult to manage 135ft. screen, it seems this drive-in will be too close to the Toronto Island Airport and not permitted to use an FM stereo transmitter. Apparently they are going to install an AM "bleeder" under the ramps. Too bad, not much choice. I don't recall my date or I ever being disappointed by the AM sound back in high school , but the bigger problem will be the huge screen. With a captive market of 2million, I feel they will still do well, especially considering it's just another attraction for them, but I think they'd have done better with 3 50foot screens, mono sound or not.....

Gordon, maybe they'll want those twin Cinemaradio units we have, does anyone still make anything like those????


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-27-2001 08:21 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The airport may even complain about them having an AM transmitter because aircraft broadcast on AM frequencies. The drivein should install speakers instead.


 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Bradley
Film Handler

Posts: 12
From: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 05-28-2001 12:08 PM      Profile for Geoff Bradley   Email Geoff Bradley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave, is this going out by the Panavision
offices?


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2001 12:13 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Panavision isn't down there it is PSLights
The airport should not have a problem with FM transmission so I think someone is feeding a bunch of bs
FM transmitters used here are DOC approved (dept. of communucations) and are stamped accrodingly

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Stricker
Master Film Handler

Posts: 481
From: Calumet, Mi USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-28-2001 12:42 PM      Profile for Jeff Stricker   Email Jeff Stricker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AM can be done right (just like film!). An AM modulator with a decent high frequency response will sound quite good. It isn't the AM modulation process that's the problem, but narrow bandwith receivers and stations that restrict their upper high frequency end in favor of more "punch" in the voice region and less interference to adjacent channels.

Quite a few car radios these days (especially those intended for C-QUAM AM stereo) have adaptive passbands that widen in the presence of a stong enough signal. They DO sound good.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 05-28-2001 10:19 PM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Geoff, I'm not a local, not exactly sure where it is. About the FM being banned, that's apparently what the fellow installing the equipment has told another exhibitor, so I can't say for sure what's going on.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Bianchi
Film Handler

Posts: 40
From: Independence, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-30-2001 03:20 AM      Profile for Mike Bianchi   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Bianchi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anybody have a source for more information on this place? I'm outside Cincinati but plan on visiting Toronto again soon.

Thanks

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 05-30-2001 05:25 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi

This is the first I have heard of a drive-in being refused permission to broadcast on the fm band because of a nearby airport.

At the power levels required and with the appropriate antenna system the signal should not reach out far from the drive-in. Further, the fact that aircraft do not use fm radio frequencies means that there should be no interference. There is a greater likelyhood of interference from the large, powerful fm radio transmitters in Toronto.

At Dromana Drive-in (near Melbourne) the owner (a ham radio operator like myself) uses a dummy load as an antenna to great efect with his fm transmitters. A dummy load is really not an antenna at all but rather just a load attached to the end of the antenna cable to ensure that the energy being radiated by the transmitter is not relected back into the transmitter.

As it was explained to me, there is a strong ground wave that permeates for a relatively small distance only. The effect is that within the drive-in perimeter the signal is quite strong but the moment you get out of the grounds and start to drive away, the signal drops away very quickly and sharply. I have left my radio tuned to the drive-in frequency and driven out of the grounds only to find that after 50 ft or so the drive-in signal dropped away very quickly.
http://www.drivein.net.au/

Here in Australia the licensing system plays a part also. We have what we call a 'class license' for various low powered transmtters. On certain frequencies (including the fm band) one can legally operate a small transmitter provided the EIRP (the output power)does not exceed a certain threshold. One does not need to contact the Government, get a callsign or pay a license fee to do.
http://www.aca.gov.au/legal/licence/class/lipd.htm

cheers Peter


 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-30-2001 06:41 AM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The whole story sounds like hogwash to me, mostly because of that "FM not allowed" nonsense.
The CN Tower is almost beside the airport. and transmits a few megawatts of FM and TV, plus a bunch of AM radio and microwave.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 05-30-2001 08:14 AM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember, the "FM not allowed" was passed to me second hand, it's possible there's another reason. But, however they're doing it, the drive-in will open soon, in the old shipyards of Toronto. Of course, should the 2008 Olympics be awarded to Toronto, all this land will be redeveloped, the "Docks" will be no more (owners laughing all the way to the bank). Here's the link, John the characatured image seems to indicate the screen will face the lake, you'll need a high-powered telescope!
www.thedocks.com/nav/drivein.htm

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-30-2001 11:33 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll need both a telescope and a very high tower to watch the movies from Rochester! I read somewhere that with the curvature of the earth, I would need to be over 1000 metres above Lake Ontario to see Toronto over the horizon. Toronto harbor is 95 miles (160 kilometres) from Rochester "as the crow flies". Wonder if the reason the Toronto Island Airport fears the drive-in radio system is that they are turning up the radiated power just to reach Rochester!

Maybe I can borrow the backup telescope optics that Kodak build for the Hubble Telescope (the GOOD optics that wouldn't have needed to be fixed by a Space Shuttle mission). :
Kodak Made Backup Mirror for Hubble Telescope
Kodak Hubble Telescope Mirror Moved to Smithsonian Museum

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-01-2001 05:22 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well the drivein is open and the equipment is
Simplex Xl with high speed movement
Simplex XL soundhead
Xetron lamphouse and Irem rectifier
ORC platter
Decad FM transmitter and a microphone mixer for preamps
Interesting note
The installing company forgot to put oil in the machine that had no oil sight glass and was installed non operating side flush against the wall guess what it seized up
If the fact there was no oil in it was not enough the oil pump was not moved to the back of the head and with the very steep up angle it wouldn't have pumped any oil anyway

 |  IP: Logged

Keith Madden
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Washington, DC, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 08-01-2001 10:31 PM      Profile for Keith Madden   Email Keith Madden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I see, so instead of a new drive in they have a new drive out

And clouds of smoke from the booth, not the Chevy in front....


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.