Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: 4000 Xenon at 105A

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » 4000 Xenon at 105A (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: 4000 Xenon at 105A

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 05-19-2001 07:02 AM

Hello everyone.
I found in a theater os my chain an Osram Xenon 4000, that should run at 135A nominal (80-150 range), working at 105A.
If I would make a comparison with another lamp, how much brightness I'm loosing? Can I say "It is working like a 3000W xenon lamp"?

Bye
Antonio

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 05-19-2001 07:20 AM

In xenon lamps, light output is generally proportional to power (watts = voltage x current). So running a lamp at lower current will give lower light output, proportional to the power being consumed. Lamp current can be adjusted to "fine-tune" light output, as long as you stay within the specified current range for the lamp. Many recommend using a new lamp at about 85% of its maximum rated current, and increasing current to maintain light output during the life of the lamp. Never exceed the maximum rated current for the lamp.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 05-19-2001 09:01 AM

Thank you John.

But I read on Osram "operating instruction" that running a xenon lamp at a lower current than nominal will not increase lamp life.
Since 4000's maximum power is 150A why not install it at 135 and raise up to 150 if necessary?

However, in you opinion, running a 4000 Osram Xenon bulb at 105A can make sense? If current follow power proportionally, so their lamp is giving about 3000W...
And since they have brightness problem I don't understand why they should keep it at 105A, what do you think about?

Bye
Antonio

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 05-19-2001 09:29 AM

I think the lamp would tend to blacken prematurely as well as be slightly unstable.
It will also be produceing less light than a 3K would running at 105 amps

| IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 05-19-2001 01:43 PM

what you want to do is maintain the current voltage so that when multiplied by the amperage it totals as close as possable to the total wattage of the bulb. this is how it should look

dc amperage =135
dc voltage = 30
total watts= 4050

If you can maintain this you will be fine. You will be apperating within the recomended current settings.

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 05-19-2001 02:09 PM

Actually Volts x Amps can be incorrect for depending on several values either the volts or max amps would have to be exceeded to get the desired VA

| IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 05-19-2001 03:05 PM

those lamps are tested before shipping they come with a test sheet that tells the volts and amps that the bulb was tested at multiply this and see what the watts are. You should be running somewhere close to this.

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 05-19-2001 03:50 PM

That information is based on a given test system. In fact different lamphouse/rectifier combinations will vary from that, even exhaust airflow will vary that.
The important issue is not the watts as based on VA but that neither voltage nor amperage maximums are exceeded

| IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 05-20-2001 05:44 AM

Another question about this 4000. Yesterday has been raised to 135A without problems.
I would like to align the lamp again. With a 4000W how much time can I keep the lamp projecting into the lens (without any prints and with projector running) before having damages? I wonder this because at my booth I have a 2500W and I really don't want to create any damage with a 4000W.

Thanks
Antonio

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 05-20-2001 06:37 AM

With that large a lamp, I would keep each session to less than 30 seconds, with a few minutes for the lens to cool down between sessions. Following the alignment procedure outlined by Pat Moore (string/laser alignment first, then "bullseye" technique without lens, then final touchup with lens), you really shouldn't need more than a few 30 second sessions to fine tune the alignment. I'm sure others who do this on a daily basis will have more "hands on" suggestions.

| IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 05-20-2001 10:18 AM

Yes you should remove the flat lens and bullseye the spot on the screen. The black circle should be as round as possable and not have black rings around it. Then switch lens to scope and fine tune the light output using 30sec intervals to protect the lens. I also run a large test loop thru to make sure that there is no scorching of film. and to check for focus flutter. this is also good time to reset the focus on the flat lens so the film does not start out of focus.

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 05-20-2001 12:11 PM

Since you have I believe mentioned you have cinemeccanica they use a crosshair sight system to align the lamphouse.

| IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 05-20-2001 02:17 PM

Thanks Darryl.

Gordon,
Yes, it is a Cinemeccanica V5.
Should I know something about the "crosshair sight system" of that projector to align better the lamp?

Bye
Antonio

| IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 05-24-2001 12:52 PM

We put the lamp at 130A and the result is stunning. We have to thanks Cinemeccanica that installed that lamp few months ago.
However I've noted that the amperometer arrow is not very stable. It is moving slowly in a +/- 2-3 Ampere range.
My two 2500s are more stable. Is it normal on higher power?

Bye
Antonio

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 05-24-2001 02:49 PM

Is there any flicker?
It may take a few days for the lamp to stabalise at the new current

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.