|
|
Author
|
Topic: Chain print circuits
|
|
|
|
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 06-10-2001 02:18 PM
Reject it. If the print was something that you had been able to clean up and the audience wasn't affected, I'd say to give the home office a call and heads up. The manager and projectionist on the other end are going to be pissed no matter how you handle it, so handle it in the most professional way possible by notifying the brass and letting them take action or not. S.O.P.: File a written report (to at least two different people) detailing the damage, and get someone else to look at the print and verify in writing that the damage was as described. C.Y.A.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-10-2001 05:20 PM
Reject it.Each theatre has a budget that includes things like payroll, utilities and supplies. There is often a category for "film" ... including damaged film. Also, think about this in terms of organizational behavior: Basically what happens when you have one slacker and one over-achiever like that is the slacker doesn't get in trouble for slacking and the over-achiever doesn't get "credit" for doing all the work. The only way the slacker will get in trouble is when things don't get done. Since the over-achiever is doing it all he is, in essence, just giving the slacker permission to be lazy. I used to find myself in situations all the time where I ended up doing a lot of extra work because other people weren't doing their work. After a while, people will just start slacking off even more because they think that you'll do it for them. It even got so bad that when things didn't get done managers would start comming to ME even though it wasn't my job! Finally, I just said to myself, "F*** it! If other people aren't going to do their jobs then I'm not going to it for them." Once a few people started getting in trouble for being lazy they started working more. I say the same thing goes for you. That other theatre isn't going to learn to clean up their act unless somebody brings it to the company's attention. Just remember to be very diplomatic about it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Walsh
Film God
Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 06-10-2001 08:26 PM
Personally, I would think about reporting the damage first. I don't mean that I would _not_ report it; I just mean there may be other issues to think about before I do. Since both theaters work for the same company, I might do a little detective work (do they always damage prints? Are they short-staffed? Are the defects clearly lab-related, or operator-damage? Etc.) If it is clearly lab-related, I'd reject it. Techincolor can see it's lab related, and shouldn't charge you, even if the print has been out for a while. If it is operator damage, what happens if you report it? Is the company known for comming down hard on people who damage prints (ie: might they fire someone?) Can you live with "bad blood" between you and the other theater? I'd have to know exactly how bad it is damaged. These are the kind of things I'd think about.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 06-13-2001 07:34 PM
Brad: Ask for a replacement print, but give the other theatre a "heads up" on why you had to get a replacement. Tough as that may be, it's even tougher if you yourself cause damage through carelessness, and have to ask for a replacement print. Question: What does it say about a theatre when they post a sign "We are sorry to inform you that there is a very bad scratch through most of the print on Screen #5, and we can't get a replacement."? (Sign actually seen at a Rochester theatre during the first week's run of a major release). Answer: It says they damaged the print, and are unwilling to admit it and pay for a replacement. So the audience is either forced to put up with the damage, or go to another theatre. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|