Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Second Reel Of THE OTHERS jumpy???

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Second Reel Of THE OTHERS jumpy???

Author

Topic: Second Reel Of THE OTHERS jumpy???

Bob Ferreira
Film Handler

Posts: 15
From: Conway NH USA
Registered: Jul 1999

posted 08-28-2001 11:55 PM

I know i am about 2 weeks late but i had been meaning to ask if anyone noticed any problems with their copy of The Others. I noticed when previewing that it was jumping around a lot (mostly vertically) and then the frame lines would move around and you would see part of the frame at the top, then it would go away, then at the bottom, then go away again. This only happened in the second reel, and in three different auditoriums. It was almost like there was an extremely poor editing job done on the film. Similar things happend with Scary Movie 2, which was thrown together blindly by the editors apparently. Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else had this problem with their prints...

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 08-29-2001 01:06 AM

The prints I have seen were all printed very sloppy. The registration is abnormally poor, but the insane amount of negative dirt is what amazed me.

| IP: Logged

Anthony Gilardi
Film Handler

Posts: 6
From: Gloucester, MA, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 08-29-2001 01:08 AM

I have this film at my theater and I haven't noticed any problems.

| IP: Logged

Wes Hughes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 175
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 08-29-2001 01:51 AM

If you can see neighboring frames on screen that sounds pretty bad. If you have a suitable projector you can try holding your head really still and looking at the film between the bottom of the gate and the intermittent. See if you see the perforations themselves are moving up and down just a tiny bit, or if the actual image on the film looks unsteady.

it might be too late to be worth the effort for you, but you can get a replacement reel...and don't take NO for an answer!

and Brad: our print was COVERED with dust and dirt, and the sides of the film on the reels was gouged pretty bad. I am getting more and more prints like this. I started unrolling a trailer the other day and the entire length of it was covered with dust like someone had sprinkled talcum powder on it. I just don't get it.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 08-29-2001 09:20 AM

I agree with Wes that if you pull the aperture plate such that you can see the actual print film perforations projected on the screen, and they are steady, the unsteadiness is printed in. If excessive, request a new print. Likewise, excessive white dirt will usually be accepted as a reason to request a new reel.

Dirt particles (black dirt) on a feature or trailer could have been picked up anytime after the print was processed. With ads and trailers, the "breakdown" into small rolls is often subcontracted. Poor packaging (trailers just stuffed into a shipping case) adds to the problem. A few pennies spent for proper packaging would go a long way in keeping the film clean and undamaged during shipping.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Tim Sherman
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: North Ridgeville, OH, USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 08-29-2001 08:34 PM

I have had more prints doing this this year then i can count. One that i remeber being really jumpy was on the second reel of shrek. All the other reels were fine. Just the second reel. Are they now just printing copies so fast that the quality suffers?

------------------

http://www.autoramadrivein.com

come on out to the drive-in and spend a night out with the stars"
ME!!

| IP: Logged

Mathew Molloy
Master Film Handler

Posts: 357
From: The Santa Cruz Mountains
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 08-30-2001 10:44 PM

Just saw this last night and not sure whether it was reel 2 or 3 now but there was what looked like water damage all over the left side of the film that reel only. I have to agree with Brad that it did look like a sloppy printing job throughout.

| IP: Logged

Wes Hughes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 175
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 08-30-2001 10:59 PM

I am a firm believer that polyester stock is hardly ever as steady in the gate as traditional stocks.

i hate it!

| IP: Logged

Matthew Cunningham
Film Handler

Posts: 5
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: May 2001

posted 08-31-2001 02:11 AM

Odd.
One of the theaters I service had this same problem with the second reel only.
They contacted the distributor and replaced the reel.
How would this happen in several prints, 2nd reel and none others, with many different prints?

| IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 08-31-2001 07:16 AM

I believe Brad said negative dirt, not post processing. I have the same thing with Captain Corelli's Mandolin, but it's not just the neg dirt...it's the negative marks and scratches...amazingly poor for a new print.

------------------
"It's not the years honey, it's the mileage' - Indiana Jones.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 09-04-2001 07:06 AM

Tim Sherman said: "One that i remeber being really jumpy was on the second reel of shrek. All the other reels were fine. Just the second reel. Are they now just printing copies so fast that the quality suffers?"

Matthew Cunningham said: "One of the theaters I service had this same problem with the second reel only. They contacted the distributor and replaced the reel. How would this happen in several prints, 2nd reel and none others, with many different prints?"

High speed release printing is NOT necessarily the cause of unsteadiness. As noted before, sometimes the unsteadiness is introduced by the use of continuous contact printing for the intermediate stages, where a short pitch camera negative is printed onto a short pitch master positive which is then contact printed to make the short pitch duplicate negatives. (For optimum steadiness, a short pitch original should be printed onto long pitch raw stock --- contact printing short pitch originals to short pitch raw stock may result in slippage and unsteadiness). Since many prints of reel 2 were evidently unsteady, I suspect the unsteadiness was introduced prior to the duplicate negative.

Here are recommendations on the use of proper pitch from the Kodak website:
Optimum Pitch for Printing
Motion Picture Printing

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.