Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: 'Legally' out-of-frame

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » 'Legally' out-of-frame

Author

Topic: 'Legally' out-of-frame

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-05-2001 11:23 AM

At first, I thought that one of our trailers before the feature 'Legally Blonde' was cut out-of-frame, but it turned out that there was an out-of-frame tape splice between the opening Fox logo and the following MGM logo.

This movie is distributed in Australia by Fox, so I take it they added their own logo at the depot after the prints had left the lab (actually, I think the prints are imported from the US). Anyhow, whoever added the Fox logo cut the tail of the Fox logo one sprocket out and the head of the incoming MGM logo one sprocket out, giving a cumulative 2 sprocket out-of-frame join. How could they possibly make a mistake at *both* ends? After correcting the problem, I felt that it was also the person's fault who made up the print for not having picked this up at the bench during inspection.

Nonetheless, I feel that if the distributor cannot get this spliced in frame from the outset, then they probably don't deserve to have their tag shown at all (although I did replace it).

Agree/disagree? Have others received trailers, features or other materials that arrived 'as new' which were not in frame?

| IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999

posted 10-05-2001 01:04 PM

Out-of-frames don't usually happen with new prints here in the US, probably because trailers are printed right with the feature. As with any "mass production" item, it's in everybody's best interest to try to do things correctly from the start.

If your prints are from the US, some guy has to manually edit in the the logo.. no way to automate that, so errors will occur.

All you can do is say; "Idiot!" and fix it. If it happens often, then complain to the distributor, I guess. Maybe it can be traced to "Editor Number 47."

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 10-05-2001 02:23 PM

John said: "Maybe it can be traced to "Editor Number 47."

I've always suspected "Editor Number 13" was the bad apple. Right along with inspection by "Integrity".

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 10-05-2001 02:32 PM

Who knows where the problem came. I've seen prints where there was a light line between the attached trailer and the feature that was an "in frame" place to cut...but only on 2 of the 3 prints for example. The guys adding the trailers may have checked one out and just assumed that all were printed from the same interneg and thus made the mistake.

Personally, I would fix the splice and keep running the tag if it can be made seamless. The only time I do not run the tag is if I get a used print and the fadeup is missing or there are marks on it from a sloppy projectionist at a trade screening. In that instance, the studio logo gets thrown in the trash can and I request a new reel. If the reel comes, then it is swapped out. If the reel does not come, then the studio does not get their tag shown. Same thing if the guys attaching the logos cut off the fadeup of the studio logo or fadeout of the attached trailer. (The Fox logo is the worst one for easily made mistakes since the audio is ahead of the picture.) I don't have much patience with people who cannot properly handle film.

| IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99

posted 10-05-2001 06:34 PM

We had a factory new trailer a few months ago for "American Outlaws" that had a long strip of white tape holding two film-ends together, right in the middle of the trailer! It was obvious roll-ends, because there were holes punched in the film stock on both sides of the "splice." If this is the future of lab splices, watch out!

| IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 10-09-2001 07:29 PM

Ours was in frame, but they have (almost) removed the entire MGM logo as well. I say almost because they have tried to keep the start of the soundtrack in place (which is commendable) but to do this and still remove the MGM tag, the last 8 frames of the MGM tag fading out had to be kept in.

I think all the MGM tag should have been left on as the very first thing that comes up in the opening titles is MGM Presents anyway...

Fox should just put the tag in the box with the print...I'll do the rest.

BTW...another bloody photoguarded print.

| IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 10-10-2001 02:48 PM

I remember one of our prints of Air Force One (brand new I might add) had a bad factory splice inbetween the attached trailer and the main feature.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 10-10-2001 02:54 PM

If you find a splice exactly between the attached trailer and the feature, it was obviously made AFTER the film was printed and processed by the lab. Sometimes the lab is contracted to do this, in their "positive assembly" area. Splicing on trailers may also be subcontracted, or done at the film exchange. Finally, the print may have been at another theatre, and had the trailer removed, and then spliced back on. "Factory" splices on polyester film are usually made with an ultrasonic splicer.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.