|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Variable Density & Red LED's
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler
Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-30-2001 12:32 AM
I don't know if this topic has been raised before ... but,Some months ago the Astor cinema in Melbourne (Australia) had some new prints run off in LA of some old movies for a film festival. When they took delivery of the prints they tried running them on their red-LED reverse scan soundhead and the sound was low level, distorted and "harsh". In fact so much so, that they were unable to run them for the public. As it transpired the soundtracks were variable density and had been printed in high magenta. A tech was called who converted the soundhead back to the old exiter lamp setup and the prints played perfectly. So it would seem that high magenta, a red light source and variable density do not mix. I have since wondered what would have happened if the variable density track had been printed in cyan, or if the high magenta track had been played with a high intensity green light source(green being complimentary to magenta). I suspect that the problem is due to the "grey scale" of the variable density track being rendered non-linear by the red light source. Anyone else come across this problem and/or any technical explanations for the problems experienced by the Astor? ------------------ Ray Derrick President Panalogic Corporation Pty Limited 44 Carrington Road Castle Hill NSW 2154 Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-30-2001 06:00 AM
Some of my customers have come across this problem. RED light just isn't the best light source to begin with. The solar cell is sensitive to the infrared spectrum in the first place. I would suspect that if you changed the LED to an infrared one that the film would have played ok as well. I have one exhibitor that is having me do just that and we will experiment. I also believe that the motion picture academy theatre has infrared LEDs rather than the visable ones to handle all of the soundtracks best (cyan not a reality yet, and probably never). The whole red LED thing just ticks me off every time. It is a dumb idea in this day and age that yeilds inferior results at best. Their life-span is a bit wild too and their fading is unacceptable. All of the infrared LED systems we have installed since about 1996 are still running and still at Dolby level without having to constantly tweek them (over 12000 hours later)...you can get a red LED to say constant for even a month. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-30-2001 02:21 PM
The movie industry Dye Track Committee is meeting at ShowEast on Thursday morning, November 1, at 9:00 am. The meeting will be held in the New York / New Orleans conference room at the Orlando Marriott World Center. I recall that committee member Jess Daily (of the UCLA film archive) did quite a bit of testing comparing old variable density tracks on both white light and red LED readers. If you still have access to the prints, I'm sure the committee would be interested in evaluating the problems encountered. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler
Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-30-2001 07:40 PM
Gordon, I think you may be right about the prints being magenta, rather than high magenta. This would make more sense given the lack of silver in the former.Steve, interesting point about infra-red LED's. The tracks may have played correctly if that option was tried. I also agree that the rate of fading of red LEDs is unacceptable. Have you run any cyan film with an infra-red system? In theory, primary red light (approx 650nm) should produce the greatest degree of "darkness" of cyan dye, so infra-red (theoretically) will produce less contrast and hence lower gain and higher film noise. But as you say, the peak sensitivity of solar cells is in the infra-red region (about 7dB better at 950nm than at 650nm to be precise) so this will tend to offset the gain loss but not the increased film noise. I look forward to the results of your tests. John, the matter was reported to several "authorities" on the subject at the time, including Jesse at UCLA, but as far as I am aware, no one has come up with an actual technical explanation for the distortion and harshness at this time. ------------------ Ray Derrick President Panalogic Corporation Pty Limited 44 Carrington Road Castle Hill NSW 2154 Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler
Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-30-2001 09:34 PM
Steve, I quote from US patent 5,587,749 (Goldberg & Richards, Dolby Labs):"Unfortunately, the dyes used in all color prints have a very low absoption in the infrared region." They go on to discuss Fig 2 of the document, which shows very little absorption in the infrared region when silver re-development is not used. In other words, cyan dye (or any other colour dye) is largely transparent to infrared light in the absence of silver. This patent makes interesting reading and can be found on the US Patent Office website (www.uspto.gov) The patent is essentially for the use of a red LED to read a cyan analogue soundtrack. Yes folks, Dolby have actually patented the colour RED!
------------------ Ray Derrick President Panalogic Corporation Pty Limited 44 Carrington Road Castle Hill NSW 2154 Australia Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Michael Hunt
Film Handler
Posts: 63
From: Gloucester, Gloucestershire, UK
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 10-31-2001 07:00 PM
Strangely, I received more comments about older soundtracks when my main screen was still equipped with an exciter lamp - I converted to reverse scan LED because I was extremely impressed with the Stereo seperation and clarity in my newer screen, which had been supplied with reverse scan IR LED's, as at the time of installation, Strong were shipping reverse scan IR's as standard (c. 1995/6)Since converting the main (smaller) screen to Red LED, I've rarely found problems with older B&W films... I tend to get the most complaints from pensioners, who want to hear the dialogue, and none of that music... can you ask the projectionist to turn it off... Incidentally, we play host to the local film society, and their head honcho is a pensioner... They insist we show films 'right' and have often asked for the volume to be turned up if they feel it's too quiet... Sometime's I'm glad not to be in a multiplex chain, though I'd love to have any form of Digital sound in the main screen..... ------------------ Uncle to JEDI Hunt, honest!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stefan Scholz
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 223
From: Schoenberg, Germany
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 11-03-2001 06:38 AM
I have a 1957 cinemascope print in my collection, that uses a magenta colored density track as optical (backup). The track is magenta colr layer only, and contains no silver. It works, within the limitations of half track width, on a conventional lamp reader, with just a little lower output. Using the track on a Kinotone reverse was impossible and showed the reported results. Firstly, the reverse scan reader never sounded as clear with older tracks, as the incasdescant lamp pickups did, either foreward or reverse scan type. Secondly I came across the distortion problem, when I converted my first setup to red Lasers in the mid 90's. Films tended to sound sybilliant, indicating cross modulation due to non linear pickup. So the processor's preamp was replaced with a current converter input, and the problem vanished. Solar cells have a liniar current to light ratio, not voltage to light. So, if you change the type of light and or intensity, and use a voltage amp, as most processors do, the working range is severely shifted out of the quasi linear range. I was using a 5 mW laser with line generator on my U2's, so by changing the main processor to ADSG's DCP 1k again brought up the problem. A 12 Ohm resistor paralleled to the cell input, and slightly higher preamp gain got rid of the distortions. The Kinotone (Dolby) preamp in the retroscan reader has an input impedance of more than 400 Ohms. My final solution was to omit the internal amp, just using the cells and my external current converter preamp. It now works fine, and I could even run the LED at lowest current position, helping it staying stable.Most preamp designers seem to think, the cell behaves like a dynamic microphone, so their preamps are basicly modified mike designs, fiddling just a little with input resistance to gain a compromise between sensitivity, noise, and IMD, and most modern appliance just go for a specificic track type. AFAIK only Kintek featured a current preamp, probably the best feature among their processors.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|