|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: LAST MOVIE YOU SAW?
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 12-28-2001 09:09 AM
I normally see about 6 films a year in theatres. I only go to theatres with projectionists and I also tend to only go to theatres with curtains. Thus my choices are severely limited. I generally catch whatever the Senator Theatre in Baltimore, MD is playing. http://www.senator.com I think Monsters Inc was the last film I saw in a movie theatre (THX and in EX and everything). Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-28-2001 01:18 PM
Hell, I went to two films last night.First I went to see The Majestic at a notably inferior theatre on "free popcon day". They were tremendously busy and the staff was behind. The trailers were all scratched to shit. The feature looked like the aperature plate wasn't in all the way and the crdits were out of frame. But the film was mercifly unscratched so I watched it without complaint. I enjoyed the scenes in the theatre itself. I would have liked to run the Majestic. I love the idea of the apartment above the theatre and the usher living in the basement. Nobody would be late to work. I did find the fact that they were a small town and had Matinees at 11 & 2 evenings at 6 & 9 a little far fetched. Then I went to see Ali at the new Stadium 14. The presentation was much better as was the sound. Both films I enjoyed watching. I don't need or want to watch them again. I feel that the set decoration in The Majestic was Oscar caliber and I would like to see Jon Voit get an Oscar nod for his portrayal of Howard Cosell, it was uncanny.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 12-28-2001 09:03 PM
There are NO commercial theatres in Brooklyn, a city of 3 million, worth getting indigestion from suffering through poor-to-horiffic presentation and showmanship. I THOUGHT there were still a few quality houses in New York City, but I was proved wrong, at least for the Loews Astor Plaza. Imagine watching one of your favorite films of all time and having to suffer through white splice flashes at EVERY shot change because the usher-sprocket jockey didn't frame it properly after he finally "corrected" a glaring misframe at the opening of the film. The reissue on 70mm of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY was the last film I saw; the one before that was two months ago. And that's about the average, one every two months or so. And Brad, you are right about presentation, you want picture and sound to be perfect. But don't dismiss showmanship; it doesn't have to be either/or -- great picture and sound, while abandoning everything else -- patron comfort, an interior that actually has some character rather than looking like a uninviting hovel, ammenities like curtians, an attentive USHER that can actually be summoned to help you with a problem, and yes, a curtain.... even such an extravagance as a projectionist at lease SOMEWHERE within a few minutes of the booth. These ammenities don't have to at the expense of picture and sound. Just because your theatre has a curtain doesn't mean it has to have crap on the screen and AM sound. Used to be that the flagship, first-run theatres always had BOTH, and it didn't seem to take any great magical powers to do it. I liken these utilitarian, character-less black box "cinemas," even though they may have good picture and sound, to a 5 star restaurant that offers fantastically prepaired meals, but which has these culinary delights served, not by a head waiter, but by a HS kid with spiked hair, a ring in his nose and grungy cloths -- he throws down the plate on a dirty table that has no table cloth and one leg shorter than the rest so it wobbles every time you put you fork down. The floors are sticky and when you need water, there is no one anywhere to be found. You want your steak cooked a bit more, but when you finally find another high school kid, he tells you there is NO COOK in the kitchen -- the cook only comes in on Friday when he prepairs all the meals so they can be automated the rest of the week by the minimum wage help. The way the HOUSE is run is as important as the way the BOOTH is run. They are two sides of the same coin. If the patron is unhappy with EITHER, or further if he isn't IMPRESSED by either, he stays home in HIS theatre where his comfort and sense of taste are catered to. No one tells him in HIS theatre to ignore the fact that the place looks shabby or that there are kids making noise in front of him or that his bathroom smells like a cespool. It simply isn't enough to put a great picture on the screen, sound in a room with stadium seating and then pretty much abandon the patron who enters that ugly black hole at his own risk. We should demand both, or the economics of unhappy patrons will force changes that may quickly make the sorry state of today's cinema get even worse.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 12-29-2001 12:07 AM
Brad,The Curtains and projectionist are necessary but not sufficient! But with curtains, the likelihood of a stained screen are less than with a naked one and with a "projectionist" a poor show is also less likely therefore, using the above criteria, ones odds of a good presentation are increased. Furthermore, exhibitors that invest in projectionists and curtains tend to also not skimp on the quality of the show, by definition. Basically now, there is one theatre in DC I will go to and one in Baltimore. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|