|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Author
|
Topic: I really need to start splicing head and tail leaders back on the prints
|
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-06-2002 01:25 AM
Seriously, Ive known for a while that its supposed to be done this way, but havent convinced myself to do it until recently. The only problem I've had when doing this is finding the best way to do it. I have a STRONG makeup table where the reel lies sideways on top of it and there is not enough room for the splicer.I tried setting the splicer on top of the reel to make the splice, gut quickly realized that its waaaay too dangerous and I could risk dropping the splicer. Then i tried doing it at the platter and the only problem there is that sometimes the tail leaders are too short and they come off of the reel and I have to wind them up to keep them off the floor and then put them back on the reel. Is there a better way to do this or is the second option the way to go?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-06-2002 02:27 AM
The professional way of breaking down a print is to single sided splice the leaders back on. I've used the Strong table and there is enough room for the splicer, although not a lot. If you have to, place the splicer on the table to make your splice, then set it elsewhere while you unload the reel.Remember, when breaking down do NOT use the cutting blade on your splicer to separate the splice. Doing so will only damage the initial cut and force the next guy to chop off two frames to make a good joint. Also do NOT chop off another frame so you don't have to peel the splicing tape off. Again, the professional way to break down is to peel your splicing tape off and reattach the leaders with a single sided splice. However, in a rush situation, I've personally no problem if you just tear the splice in your hands, leaving the splicing tape in tact, and just lay a single sided splice on top. That way if the next theater cares enough to save the frame (sadly most don't these days), they can do the peel job for you. I don't know what theater you work for James, but I do know that AMC actually TEACHES the practice of breaking down without reattaching the leaders. (You see, using half a foot of splicing tape is WAAAAAAY too costly for a print on ship out in AMC's opinion.) An alternative acceptable solution in AMC's eyes is to use a piece of the cheapest, nastiest masking tape you can find. Both are completely unacceptable methods of breaking down and I wish someone at AMC would get in there and change that company policy/training practice. Frequently when I've received a print that played (even if just one time for a screening) at an AMC, I have to chop off multiple frames because I cannot get that damned masking tape goo off of the film and I don't want a brain wrap in the middle of my show from it. If the print came from one of the "just tuck the film under the leader and ship it out" AMCs, there is almost always scratching where the film rubbed up against itself and frequently damaged sprockets and folded film too. Stupid, stupid, stupid! (I might add that I know of at least 4 times where I flat out rejected a print due to such carelessness during breakdown that only played once at an AMC and that theater DID have to pay for a new copy.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-06-2002 03:12 AM
In AMC's defense, they are currently making many changes in how projectionists are trained and how things are done. I do not know everything involved as parts of it are being rolled out a little at a time, but the latest update on biuldup policy did make mention of actually splicing leaders back on.As far as tape is concerned, the only tape that is now approved by AMC is the white paper tape from permacel (the same stuff used on many prints behind the title on the head and tail leaders). Despite the reputation they may have, they are making some improvements on how things are done.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 01-06-2002 01:07 PM
James, I've used Strong MUT's in the past. Like Brad said, there is enough room for the splicer. I put it between the reel and the rollers. I find it a good idea, as was mentioned, to put the splicer on the floor when I'm done with it.Yes, using splicing tape is the ony professional way to go. But if you must use masking tape, I also recommend white paper tape. I've heard it referred to as non-oozing tape, I guess because it doesn't leave goo behind. Anyway, I don't know who makes the stuff I use, but I purchase it from Tape Products Company. It's about 3 dollars a roll, but it's much better than regular masking tape. Much more professional. I have their phone number and the product number if you're interested.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-06-2002 04:45 PM
I was never talking about leaving the splicer on the makeup table while winding the film on the reel, just for splicing.Has the design of the STRONG makeup table been altered in the past few years? I know mins stands shorted than some others (at one of my old theatres you could make up and break down from the middle platter without using thr rollers; on these you cant), but is the main body also narrower? I put down an empty reel and a splicer to see just how much room I would have. I could fit the splicer there just barely, but with no room to make a splice. My theatre was biult in 1999.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mike Judge
Film Handler
Posts: 50
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 01-06-2002 08:02 PM
This is where I hear my dad saying to me, "Where there's a will, there's a way." What about the floor? For safety's sake, whenever I'd break down I'd set my splicer on the floor up against the wall. I knew that I wouldn't step on it, I was more afraid of bumping the MUT and causing some sort of catastrophe. Next time you break down, look objectively at what you want to get done, find what will work best for you, in keeping with the most professional job possible, and you will find your answer. I agree with John though, it certainly isn't masking tape! Even in a platter booth, nothing I hate more than taking the leader off, and getting snagged by a half-assed replaced leader. Teach the respect and bring the honor back.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 01-09-2002 09:10 AM
Gee Whiz! I'd settle for a print that had the correct leaders and tails (as long as there was a reference frame) whether they were spliced on or not.In contast to the usual scrached up shit I usually get my print of Serendipity this weekend (second run) was absolutely gorgeous. Almost brand new.... not a scratch or a mark on it. However, except for the tail of the last reel number 5, there was not a head or a tail included with the print. (Probably in a prior operator's trash can somewhere). There were white bands around the reels..... but none of those was marked either. It was a 5 reel print so Reels 1 & 5 were easily identified. Not having seen the feature before, I was forced to run a couple of the middle reels just to determine the order. The last time I had to do this was with The Full Monty a couple of years back and even with screening the reels I still got it wrong!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|