Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 16mm Projectors - which one should I buy? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 16mm Projectors - which one should I buy?
Barry Floyd
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1079
From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-14-2002 01:14 PM      Profile for Barry Floyd   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Floyd   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm going to a "Surplus School Equipment" auction on Saturday morning and they have a ton of 16mm projectors up for bid. After searching the forums here for anything related to 16mm, I did come up with several threads, but are there any particular makes or models I should look for or pass up?

I plan on using these things in my basement, not for any commercial application. What about films?? Are there any good prints of anything worth watching on 16mm?

------------------
Barry Floyd
Floyd Entertainment Group
Nashville, Tennessee
(Drive-In Theatre - Start-Up)

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-14-2002 02:04 PM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm assuming that the school will have some old Bell and Howell 16mm machines. When I took care of the projectors for my junior high school in the 1980-1982 time period, we has several "autoload" models and one "slot load" model. The "slot load" type was much less problematic and much less likely to jam and damage film. If an "autoload" machine has not been well-maintained, I'd not recommend putting a treasured print through it. We had one jam that damaged a print in the "slot load" machine in a period of two years. We had jams in the autoload type every two or three weeks.

By "autoload", I mean a machine where you push a lever, turn it on, feed the film in the front and it gets pulled through, hopefully emerging from the rear of the machine. By "slot load", I mean a machine where you push a lever down, manually load the film through a slot (very easy), then pull the lever back, and it's ready to go. The autoload mechanism misthreaded way too often, while the slot load typically eliminated misthreading, and if misthreaded, the slot load projector would not typically turn on until the problem was corrected.

I should say that I have not seen or touched either type of machine since spring 1985.

------------------
Evans A Criswell
Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site


 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-14-2002 02:06 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Look for the newer models--you should be able to get nice slot-load Eikis or Elmos for under $75-100 each. The older manual-load B&H (100 and 300 series) and RCA models are good, too. Some people like the Kodak Pageants (I don't). Keep an eye out for anything "big" (xenon, carbon-arc, MARC-300, etc.) or any scope lenses; even if you don't want this stuff, you should be able to sell it on Ebay or in Big Reel and make a decent profit if you can get it at fire-sale prices.

Don't waste time with the auto-load B&H models or anything that looks like it has been abused. There's so much good equipment out there available so cheaply that it isn't worth risking good prints to junk machines.

Be sure to get rewind bench stuff (splicers [both tape and cement], rewinds, sync block, etc.) if possible.

In addition to the usual sources for used prints, you can buy lab-new prints of some classic films in the public domain (mostly silents) from Blackhawk distributors (e.g. Festival Films, etc.). They aren't cheap, but the quality is usually pretty good.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-14-2002 02:19 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of my first jobs in the film field was repairing 16mm projectors for a large school district in the Chicago Burbs. The good ones are either Eiki's, or Elmo's. Hell & Bowels were always a pain to get parts for, and to work on. The Eiki's are a cinch to repair, If the belts are bad just buy the correct size "O" ring as a replacement for it. The "O" rings will alst longer than Eiki's belts will anyway. The Elmos never did break down during the three years that I worked there.....
Mark @ GTS

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Atkinson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 129
From: Birch Run Michigan
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 01-14-2002 03:52 PM      Profile for Dennis Atkinson   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Atkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I love my Elmo. I just bought a brand new zoom lens for it and have a
Singer 16-D scope lens also. Please, never use a B&H autoshreader!

My other 16 is a Kodak Pageant. Easy to switch to silent speed and it has the adjustment for the soundtrack alignment at your finger tips.
Both the Kodak & Elmo will run shrunken film fine. Eiki's don't like shrunken film and are not forgiving.

Dennis

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-14-2002 05:57 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Check out the thread on Kodak Pageants. Several versions incluiding Marc 300s. Excellent machines. Stay away from Hell and Bowells!

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-14-2002 06:18 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, now wait a minute! I'm a factory trained Bell & Howell man. I feel they are some of the finest machines made. For info, here is the real good B&H models:

manual threading: 179, 185, 285, 399, 535, 540, 614 JAN, 1540, 1579
Autoload: 552, 1552, 1595, 2595
Slotload: don't buy, nothing but trouble
Arc lamp models: 140 (carbon arc), 566 (Marc-300), 567 (Marc-350), xenon JAN, and 1568 (Gemini-300)

On any of the B&H machines in the 1500 or 2500 series, turn on the motor and listen or feel for heavy vibrations. That's an indication of a "Cracked" worm gear which is an expensive and time consuming repair.

If you spot any Eiki machines, look for any with an "EX-" as part of the model number. That indicates a Xenon Lamp model.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-14-2002 07:14 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To add to Ken's comments: the later-model B&H slotload machines are really Eikis with a B&H nameplate. I think that these are the 3000 series. They are fine. The earlier B&H slotloads are junk.

Personally, I like the B&H manual-thread machines, but can't stand the auto-shredders. The real "win" with B&H is that there are plenty of lenses for these out there that are cheap. A scope lens for a B&H should be only about $50 or so, whereas a scope lens and bracket for an Elmo will cost several times the value of the machine.


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-14-2002 09:11 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you see any of the Phillips EL5000 portables grab them they are an excellent machine. Also the Fumeo protables are very nice

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-14-2002 10:43 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd put my vote in for the Kalart-Victor 70-, 75-, 80-, or 82-series projectors, smooth-running machines with unique "safety film trips" which stop the mechanism if a loop goes south to prevent further sprcket hole damage. (The 70-15 model is by far the most common of the line). Threading the Kalart-Victor is kind of an acquired taste, though, with its inside-out film path. These machines are not terribly difficult to service, if you can find parts.

Kodak Pageants and Eikis are still worthwhile; an EX-series xenon Eiki would be quite a find. Manual-threading Bell and Howells are OK, too, as are the 3585s on up (rebadged Eiki SNT/ENT units). But, as mentioned earlier, stay away from Hell and Bowell Autoloads (545-552, 1545-1552, 1585-1592, and 2585-2592)!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-15-2002 11:12 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the 1970s manual-load Eikis would be my first choice. They're the easiest 16mm film paths to keep clean and the film-friendliest of any claw-advance model I know. Projectors with proper intermittent mechanisms are better (less chance of perfs splitting), but there are hardly any portable ones of the sort that is likely to have been used in schools (Fumeo made a portable version of the HL-3000 but you hardly ever see them around - not over here at any rate).

The autoload Eikis are OK and it's still quite easy to lace them up manually, it's just there's more plastic in the way to stop you keeping things clean. The only drawback with Eikis are that you can only lower the speed for silent prints by changing a belt pulley: most of the Bell & Howells have a speed change knob from 24 to 18.

But autoload B & Hs are, as Dennis says, shredders, especially with brittle old acetate or with any print that has even slight perf damage. Furthermore the autoload mechanism itself is very fiddly and cumbersome, with tightly packed springs and guides making it virtually impossible to lace them up by hand. They also have a nasty habit of failing to form the lower loop properly if you feed polyester stock into them. I'd avoid them like the plague.


 |  IP: Logged

Tom Sauter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 163
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 01-15-2002 11:25 AM      Profile for Tom Sauter   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Sauter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you make a good "find" at the auction make sure you thoroughly clean and test the projector first -- although this probably goes without saying in this forum .

Run a loop of clean new leader through for a few minutes, then take a good look at the sprocket holes for damage and the picture area for scratches. Listen as the splice goes through for any chattering. Test the loopsetter mechanism by shortening the lower loop by a frame and make sure that it restores the loop quickly without causing damage to the sprockets or picture area. A poorly adjusted loopsetter will turn your gentle manual thread machine into an auto-shredder the first time a damaged sprocket goes through!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 02:23 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the reasons I like the manual-load Eikis so much is because it is possible to form the lower loop so that it clears the auto-loop-reforming device by at least two perfs' worth of film without it striking the surface below, and to form the upper loop so that it has enough clearance to survive getting larger by a perf. So even if one frame is not advanced properly, it can be transferred from the lower to the upper loop without the auto-loop-reformer kicking in and making things worse.

However, on the auto-threading versions, the auto-threading mechanism will not form the loops with this clearance and the reformer will rotate at the slightest sign of trouble. It's always worth lacing them up by hand.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 02:34 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would like to find one of those old RCA 16mm machines that were quite popular in the late 1940's and early 50's. I don't recall the model number, but it is a fantastic machine. Very quiet, easy on film, and extremely reliable.


 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-16-2002 07:55 AM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have an RCA Hollywood series 16mm projector, with long play 5,000’ spool capacity, which I have run for years and has been extremely reliable. Quiet running with a rock steady picture, I also like the smooth optical framing by the claw movement. The lamphouse was also ideal for converting to a more powerful Q.I light source.




 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.