Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » ROADSHOW PRESENTATION. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: ROADSHOW PRESENTATION.
Frank Aston
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 01-20-2002 05:48 PM      Profile for Frank Aston   Email Frank Aston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Martin Hart, on his wonderful and fascinating site The American Wide-Screen Museum (www.widescreenmuseum.com), has an interesting feature on the presentation of epic/roadshow movies.
He feels that most projectionists (and audiences) today would not be able to relate to the concept and the atmosphere of this type of presentation.
Does anyone have any thoughts on the subject?

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 01-20-2002 06:37 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, I think it could still work. But, few if any, producers/studios are willing to spend the extra money. They want wide releases to gather as much money at once as possible.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-20-2002 07:09 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So is there an official deffinition of Roadshow Presentation? Personally I think that if the theater business doesn't get back to a little more showmanship in the presentation they're going to be sunk. I mean, where's the magic these days? I certianly not in the boring computer animation or the obligatory sex scenes. I think what we need is a little more "bigger than life" razzle dazzle in the presentation. Maybe a few more corny gimick things like William Castle and his bag of tricks. I'd like to see it be "fun" again, instead of having to "put up with" stuff. Just my opinion.

------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut
http://www.muellersatomics.com/

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Fermanian
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 101
From: Sainte Adele, Quebec, Canada
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 01-20-2002 07:16 PM      Profile for Tom Fermanian   Email Tom Fermanian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With most cinemas without curtains and title curtains (remember those), It could still be great!!, Having worked on such titles as Fidler on the Roof (long version) Grand Prix, Ryan's Daughter, "2001" , Ben-Hur, Sound of Music and so many others, it was nice then that any picture over 140 minutes had an intermission built in to the film, We even had a short intro music at the begining, this was to be run with house lights half dimmed when people where sitting down in the auditorium, at a certain cue point, the feature started, we then dimmed the house lights down all the way opening the curtain, this was run WITHOUT previews or anything else to make the presentation a special feel for the attending audience. Later on at a chosen spot The Intermission would then arrive permiting us to stop for people wanting to stretch their legs,attend the restrooms or go for refreshments, We then had another 5 minute or more "walk-in" music that was run at lights hald down to permit people to re take their seats,(these walk-in bits where on black film no picture with only soundtrack) the picture then resumed until the end credits, in those days, only specials had long end credits.It gave I believe the perception that people where seeing something special, it would be great for some of the long expensive pictures today, and it would help theatres at the concession! Tom

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-20-2002 08:43 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I only saw one "true" roadshow as a kid (Sound of Music), I saw plenty of the regular runs of these roadshows in 35mm 4-track mag with the overtures, intermissions, entracte, and exit music intact. For a very BRIEF time, the overture was revived in 1979 for both Star Trek and the Black Hole, although without the curtain to cue the audience, Im afraid they would think there was something wrong. Showmanship is DEFINITELY missing today. There are still a few theatres in LA (mostly Mann theatres like the Chinese, National, etc) that actually DO still use curtains and DO close them between the previews and main attraction (amazing how many of those actually still have the curtains and won't close them between their slide show and film). Landmmark doesnt even use slides and yet has stopped using their curtains. And as Hart's page pointed out, automation doesn't limit this. The El Capitan in Hollywood has THREE curtain openings and MANY light changes for this "pre-show" and yet it is fully automated. Slides and those movietunes with the "DJ" announcements should go, too.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 01-20-2002 09:29 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
EXIT MUSIC!!
I had forgotten about that altogether...I guess even the U.S. Army
had a sense of showmanship.During my Basic Training in 1948 and again before shipping overseas, all military personnel were required to see
Information and Education films (propaganda), including the excellently edited "Why We Fight" series of seven WWII documentaries.
Stirring military marching sound track music at intermission and exit, plus cartoons such as the "Private Snafu" series (uncredited,
but I think made by Disney and Iwerks) kept the men awake and made
the presentations more palatable for a captive audience.


 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 01-20-2002 11:13 PM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Roadshows are a throwback to the days when studios actually produced movies and took pride in their product. Now they're simply releasing companies. They buy the film, crank out a bunch of crappy prints, show them for a few weeks and then make their REAL money on the networks and on DVD sales. The theatres are run by a bunch of suits who couldn't be less concerned about showmanship. They're not interested in giving you the best, just giving you something good enough to enjoy your return business now and then at the popcorn counter. Besides, you can't show advertising slides on a show curtain.

I can remember seeing Spartacus in New York (I believe it was at the DeMille Theatre) and the presentation was the best movie experience I ever had. Now if you go to see a 70mm print in Manhattan, you'll see it shown from a platter by some pimply-faced kid who doesn't know showmanship from Shinola.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-21-2002 02:09 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
"Now if you go to see a 70mm print in Manhattan, you'll see it shown from a platter by some pimply-faced kid who doesn't know showmanship from Shinola."

When is this foolishness ever going to end? I've got news for you John. Your problem with a current 70mm presentation is NOT the fact that it is ran from a platter as opposed to a changeover system. It is that pimply-faced kid in the projection booth. I know that is what you were implying, otherwise your sentence would have left out the words "from a platter".

Why is this so hard for people to understand?


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 01-21-2002 02:36 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder if today's audiences would appreciate these things. Not long ago I attended a screening during the AFI Los Angeles Film Festival at the El Capitan in Hollywood. The theater did their usual three-curtain reveal with lights and ran the AFI promo trailer. The ribbon curtain was then closed as usual at the end of the trailer. This audience (a film festival audience at that) thought it laugh-out-loud hilarious that the curtain closed then immediately opened again. Heathens.

Paul
SMPTE Hollywood Section
16mm projectionist--1st Las Vegas Jewish Film Festival
Workin' on gettin' back to SoCal and Japan


 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-21-2002 02:51 AM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I bet all the curtain opening and closing would confusr everyone if someone did that today.

They would probably think that pimply faced kid was playing with it and go out to complain.

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-21-2002 04:39 AM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think "...from a platter" is also a stock reference to the fact that platters were a chief tool of the theatre companies in removing a dedicated (changeover) projectionist from the booth.

Well, I think closing and immediately opening the curtain can indeed look a little silly, especially if it's a slow curtain that takes fifteen seconds to trundle back and forth. Too many open/close cycles can become tiresome. But it's all in the timing, really. Timing makes all the difference in how any aspect of presentation is received.

Probably the worst curtain usage I've ever seen was at the Loew's Astor Plaza in New York City, of a 70mm print of "2001" last month. Here was an opportunity to recreate the true roadshow feel, but what happened? We hear the overture ramping up because someone threaded it past the mag head, then the curtains immediately part to reveal... the black image area printed for the overture. Only it's not black, but gray, with notable negative dust throughout. Nobody in the audience said a word (well, except me). I really hope they didn't walk away from that showing thinking that Kubrick wanted them staring into the deep, deep gray of space during the overture. (Also no need to mention the scratches on this newly struck print, mysterious missing intermission, etc.)

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-21-2002 06:22 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although technically not a "Roadshow", the current large format re-release of "Beauty and the Beast" at least is something special to see. By their nature, large format theatres usually have a dedicated projectionist to keep an eye on things, and most of them have a "pre-show" touting the "IMAX Experience" or something similar, which points out the special equipment in the theatre. No curtains though .

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-21-2002 07:04 AM      Profile for Jerry Chase   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always found the open close cycle of curtains between previews and feature to be hokey. IMO, the simple corporate snipe and fanfare after the previews and prior to the feature was an improvement. The current hyperactive rollercoaster/snack bar ads are an abomination that distract from the sense of entering the story. Class is often the ability to remain understated.

Another reality of curtains was that the introductory and entre acte music was horribly muffled unless the theatre had the ability to play that music outside the normal behind-the-screen speakers or had a working scrim. Most of those main curtains were thick and had been made purposely so with the intention of deadening sound from live acts setting up on stage. I don't remember scrims being properly used (or even available) in any but the best theatres.

One of the better ideas from the last days of curtains was Pike's logo snipes with the waterfall curtain background. The first theatre I worked had a red traveller and it was possible to do a near-seamless dim of curtain lights, fade-in of the logo and opening of the curtain. The audience got the impression that the main curtain was opening and revealing a scrim, which then dissolved into the previews or feature.

Another visual trick that was always appreciated was to open the main curtain just beyond the masking for the flat previews, and then sneak them open full during the fade in of the feature and let the masking slowly widen to full screen width. "Mom! The picture is GROWING!!! Cool!"


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-21-2002 08:10 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have often debated the close/open portion of the show (aka the "Curtain Call"). At the Uptown, I have used it and as our curtain became a liability (the LH side started to tear at a seam)I ceased to avoid excess wear. The GM of the company saw one of my shows where I did the curtain call and smiled and proclaimed I "deluxed the show." So some clearly like it or remember them.

With today's short transistion from previews/ads to feature, the curtain call looks a bit silly. If there was a pause between each segment, it would look a bit better.

Now where I would most definately do a curtain call is a varient on Jerry's comment. That is, if the theatre has motorized maskings and a curtain...I will close the curtain on the flat previews. Once the curtain closes down past the masking, open the masking to scope, reopen the curtain to the scope/70mm feature. Instead of the "growing picture" it merely gets bigger by magic! The last time I had the opportunity to do this was at the K-B Cinema (alas, the Uptown does not have motorized side maskings). Of course, back then most all previews were FLAT (early-mid '80s)so the previews were uniform. It made the feature much more dramatic. Back then also the preveiws were mono and the feature often stereo so even the sound got wider and bigger.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"


 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-21-2002 10:24 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jerry said:
quote:
Another visual trick that was always appreciated was to open the main curtain just beyond the masking for the flat previews, and then sneak them open full during the fade in of the feature and let the masking slowly widen to full screen width. "Mom! The picture is GROWING!!! Cool!"

The Edwards flagship "Big Newport" in Newport Beach CA used to do this all the time. After the huge success of Star Wars (played there in 70mm 6-Track Dolby for 1 year), the Big Newport ran 70mm prints almost all the time for many years. This was the 70mm 6-Track Dolby "golden age" in Southern Calif. Many many films I can remember and some I've forgotten. And the theatre always made a show of "making the screen bigger!!" for the scope feature, which was so cool to see on a screen as large as that one (reportedly 80 feet wide). Of course at that time I had no idea there were different aspect ratios -- to me, it just looked like they were making the screen bigger for the feature.

To their credit, Edwards installed waterfall curtains in all their new construction right up until at least 1990 (when I left CA). Too bad the theatres themselves were often lacking in some other respects.

------------------
- dave
Crab juice, or Mountain Dew?


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.