Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: John Q. is skiing!! .

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » John Q. is skiing!! .

Author

Topic: John Q. is skiing!! .

Keith Peticolas
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 108
From: Eagle River, Alaska, USA
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 02-14-2002 04:01 AM

My brand new (previewing right-now)print of John Q is full of snow. White particles everywhere. I'm into the fouth reel at this moment and it hasn't stopped yet. Could this be Deluxe's tribute to the Olympics? Not quite bad enough to order a replacement, but it is driving me crazy looking at it.

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 02-14-2002 05:44 AM

Are you referring to white negative dirt on the projected image or white flaking powder accumulating in the projector? A print I saw a part of today was jam packed with negative dirt, so I'm assuming that's what you are talking about.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2002 08:59 AM

FWIW, "John Q" was NOT printed on Kodak film!!!

Excessive dirt on the print film raw stock will show up as white specks on the processed prints.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 585-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 585-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 02-14-2002 10:21 AM

This being because dirt on the unexposed film surface will stop the printer's light source from striking the emulsion?

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2002 10:39 AM

Leo asked: "This being because dirt on the unexposed film surface will stop the printer's light source from striking the emulsion?"

Yes. Most of the release printing labs now use on-line Particle Transfer Roller (PTR) film cleaners (developed by Kodak) on the printers, which has greatly improved the cleanliness of release prints. But an excessive amount of dirt on the print raw stock can still leave some dirt to cause the white "shadow images". KODAK VISION Color Print Film and the new technologies Kodak uses to slit and perforate film have greatly improved the cleanliness of Kodak print film, much to the satisfaction of distributors and labs.
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/lab/2383.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/newsletters/reel/september98/visionFilms.shtml

| IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 02-14-2002 10:52 AM

What you're describing sounds kind of like something I saw in 3 different movies in the last 6 or 8 months. The Others, Don't Say A Word, and one other I can't remember, all had 1 reel that looked like it was severely water-spotted or something. The effect on the screen image was like it was raining or snowing. The reel was like this from first frame to last. I complained to the theater and they seemed indifferent toward the issue. This wasn't regular dirt, either on the print or from the negative. The splotches were huge compared to flecks of dirt.

------------------
- dave
Look at this! His chin strap has been cut!

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2002 11:11 AM

White "shadow image" dirt can also occur during any handling stage with a negative. If the dirt becomes embedded in the negative, it may not be easily removed by the routine solvent and PTR cleaning methods used by the lab.

White "spotches" may be water marks, splashes, or some other problem that got on the negative and could not be removed by the lab.

| IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 02-14-2002 12:09 PM

To me, water marks would be the best description. They were not opaque. It literally looked like it was raining on interior scenes.

| IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 02-14-2002 02:07 PM

Out of interest, is there any limit to the number of release prints that can be contact printed off a single interneg? I assume that a negative is ultrasonically cleaned between passes - is there a limit to the number of times you can do this before the emulsion starts shedding or another issue comes into play which reduces the quality of release prints made from it?

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2002 02:23 PM

Leo asked: "is there any limit to the number of release prints that can be contact printed off a single interneg? I assume that a negative is ultrasonically cleaned between passes - is there a limit to the number of times you can do this before the emulsion starts shedding or another issue comes into play which reduces the quality of release prints made from it?"

Much depends upon how carefully the lab handles the duplicate negative, and the type of printer being used. Although the printing negative is solvent cleaned before loading the printer, most labs rely on Particle Transfer Roller (PTR) film cleaners to clean the film while it is being printed, so runs of many hundreds of prints are possible before the printing negative is pulled from production to be solvent cleaned.

Last year, Kodak introduced a new intermediate film for making master positives and duplicate negatives. KODAK VISION Color Intermediate Film 2242 features a more robust film structure and a conductive antistat that makes the printing negative more resistant to wear, and much cleaner during extended production runs:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/products/lab/5242.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/products/lab/tech5242.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/products/change/kn1dec2001.pdf

Today, making thousands of prints from a single 2242 duplicate negative would not be unheard of.

| IP: Logged

Keith Peticolas
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 108
From: Eagle River, Alaska, USA
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 02-14-2002 02:44 PM

It must be the white negative dirt, I'm not finding anything in my projector. I can not wait until digital film catches up. Really tired of the rotten quality, of late, from the labs. I'm also assuming nothing can be done about this if it was printed this way?

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2002 03:29 PM

Keith said: "Really tired of the rotten quality, of late, from the labs. I'm also assuming nothing can be done about this if it was printed this way?"

The lab usually does not specify the brand of print stock, and do the best they can with what they are told/contracted to use by the distributor. "Excessive" white dirt is a subjective judgement. Here are the Lucasfilm Theatre Alignment Program (TAP) print guidelines:
http://www.thx.com/professional_services/labgrad.pdf

| IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001

posted 02-18-2002 03:45 PM

Keith said "I'm also assuming nothing can be done about this if it was printed this way?"

My print was not like that. I'd try to get a replacement if I were you.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.