Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Reverse scan for DeVry - XD

   
Author Topic: Reverse scan for DeVry - XD
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-24-2002 01:47 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm going to be running a batch of these soon. If anyone here with DeVrys is intersted please contact me soon.
Thanks!
Mark @ New GTS

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-24-2002 02:21 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, it's a little early for April Fools. Why would someone with those machines be concerned about good sound...or good anything?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon Bachlund
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 696
From: Monrovia, CA, USA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 02-24-2002 03:49 PM      Profile for Gordon Bachlund   Author's Homepage   Email Gordon Bachlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, you may be misjudging the DeVrys.

I don't know when Herman A. DeVry, Inc., of Chicago, folded, but I do know that a number of DeVrys are still in use. When a friend and I re-opened a closed single screen house in Lynwood, CA, back in 1973, we were obliged by financial constraints to put DeVrys in the stripped booth, and they put a good picture on the screen for us for many years.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-24-2002 05:15 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh I know...I've run dailies with them! Not by choice mind you. What was on the screen was satisfactory but they were annoying to run. As soon as I had the chance I upgraded--if you want to call it that and I do--by putting in a couple of Super Simplexes and RCA's that were gathering dust. By present values it would be hard to imagine anyone wanting one when old Supers can be had for fifty bucks or less (if they don't just give it to you).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-24-2002 07:20 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,
Its still the most popular film collectors machine! So why shouldn't it have decent sound as well?
Mark @ Home


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 02-24-2002 10:44 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DeVry's are good machines. I'd also like to see them outfited with large reel arms and a place to mount a DTS time code reader and/or a Kelmar film cleaner.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-24-2002 10:57 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My main recollection of the DeVry's was that they would always shred any loop I cared to run. I never figured out how they knew it was a loop but they seemed to. And that was even threading the full path so the dummy sprocket wasn't an issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-25-2002 12:22 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree never could get a loop to run and they didn't like taped overlapped splices

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 02-25-2002 12:47 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The semi-portable has the film shedder clutch sprocket if not maintained, but the the delux model ( 2810? ) had all sprockets driven. The existing lens tube is very low fidelity ( O.K. for 1940's ). I did convert one with a Japanese laser and stereo cell with good results.
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.