Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What to do about motorboating prints? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: What to do about motorboating prints?
John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:24 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This weekend, we're running all 3 Indiana Jones movies. As you might expect, prints are not in the best condition. But for the most part they're better than can be expected. One annoying problem is that some reels of Raiders of the Lost Ark (Technicolor's only print, bleh) and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade exhibit motorboating on the right channel.

I assume this is due to some sort of failure over time, though the precise failure I don't know what. There are also ocassional visual registration problems, where the corner of the frame becomes visibule in the aperture for seconds at a time.

I'm pretty sure that our sound heads are in alignment; buzz track was run recently, though I'll run it again soon to verify, but other prints have been just fine, and the visual registration issues seem to be a sure confirmation of a print problem.

So what's the fix? One thought was to try to move the photocell
by hand until it sounds "OK". This seems a dangerous plan since the problem goes and comes and it seems conceivable that alginment sufficient to play it would fail to play properly registered soundtracks. I'm loathe to try this.

The solution I'm going with is to patch the left premplifier output off our CP65 into the CP65 Mag/Aux center channel, and run the affected portions of the film that way (with the booth monitors listening to the right preamp output to go back to regular Dolby A when the affected portions of the print clear).

Is there a better solution? Any good advice for this sort of thing?

Oh yeah -- if you book Last Crusade and have any option, don't get it from TES if you can get it from ETS.

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:27 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
All of the Indiana Jones movies are Paramount titles and can only be had through ETS. No studio distributes through both depots.

Your prints have shrunk, that is why you are hearing the motorboating. You didn't say what kind of projector/sound head you had.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:31 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry. They're Century R3s. I'm curious how this actually matters in terms of solutions though...

Technicolor does indeed have prints Last Crusade and one print of Radiers of the Lost Ark, but not (afaik) Temple of Doom.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:36 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There's definitely more than one print of Raiders. Actually, the Avon Cinema in Providence, RI is running it this weekend. Maybe they have the new print that was struck a year or so ago (which I think had an SR track instead of the original Dolby A track).

Does the motorboating happen on both projectors? How does it sound when you run it in mono?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:37 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't recommend you doing this as normal practice, but since you have R3s there *is* a way you can cheat your way through this. You should check with your tech first to make sure he won't come attack you later though.

Hopefully the lateral guide arm that rests on the top of the sound drum has a round knob. Some of them have a square knob. If you have a round knob, take a piece of masking tape and cut out a tiny arrow out of masking tape and apply it to the edge pointing straight up. If you have a square knob, take a marker and put a dot on one of the 4 sides and make a note of which direction it is pointing (example: pointing at 1:00). Below I have a picture of this done with white Artist's tape for clarity.

Now run your print and assuming the tech didn't tighten it down too tightly, slowly rotate it until your motorboating is gone. Don't turn it more than 1/2 rotation. If it doesn't clear up within 1/2 turn, you are going the wrong way. Then just make damned sure you put it back. Also beware you may not be able to get it exactly back to *perfect*, but if your tech doesn't mind running through another A-chain to help you get through these special shows, that should be enough of a rig to solve your problems. Also note that you will probably not have perfect Dolby NR decoding and matrix steering, but with a shrunken print you've got to do whatever you can. No test film can possibly align it.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:43 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe the new print of Raiders is not handled through TES.

Thanks for the recommendation, Brad. Indeed, round knobs here.
I suppose adjusting the lateral roller is a lot easier than messing with the photocell position. We can certainly redo the A-chain after this, though I am a bit concerned with how the non-shrunken portions of the print will play...

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-09-2002 11:47 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
This is an old trick I came up with when we used to run repertory movies at Northpark. It allowed us to run the normal daytime shows with the arrow pointing at 12:00 and the repertory shows at whatever setting we found balanced out best for the shrunken repertory prints. In your case, you may find that reel 1 has to play at 2:00, reel 2 may play at 12:00, reel 3 may play at 12:30 and so forth. You will have to do a pre-screening to find out.

Beware this is certainly a "rig" and is not the correct way to do it, but since the odds of you being able to have a tech perform an A-chain based upon a shrunken print between each show is out of the question, this one will get you through. Just remember whenever this is all over to get your tech back in there to align it back precisely.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-10-2002 12:05 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you have time for a test run you could take detailed notes on the best guide position (as marked per Brad's suggestion) in different parts of each reel and keep it corrected throughout the show.

O.T.: Hmm...70mm guides? Get thy JJ rebuilt for by-pass!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-10-2002 12:14 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Why is that Steve? Personally I dislike the JJs that route the film outside of the soundhead.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-10-2002 12:37 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I presume that they changed it and created a retrofit because the close clearances led to scratched film if something were a bit out of adjustment. Perhaps this became more likely with the advent of platter operation? Maybe Steve G. could shed more light on why it was redesigned but it's probably safe to say it was for cause.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-10-2002 12:43 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You may be right. Still, even though it is just a tad bit more hassle to thread 70mm film inside the optical soundhead, I have always preferred it over running it out and around. I also think it is a bit more foolproof in the threading should the unmentionable happen (some uncaring/untrained newbie running 70mm that is).

will know. He knows everything.


 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-10-2002 08:07 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had those forks cut back on our JJ's because the film curved back so far it was scratching. In one case it was so bad, I removed the entire exciter lamp assembly.

That JJ bypass soultion probably works OK, but I don't like it because it's kinda an ulgy fix!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-10-2002 10:08 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My personal JJ didn't have a legitimate R-something 70mm SH to go under it so in converting an R3 by-pass was the way to go although that aspect wasn't finished until after I had sold the machine. Mark machined the JJ casting for by-pass as per the Strong blueprint but another fellow turned rollers out of brass stock rather than buy the actual kit.

John remarked:
>That JJ bypass soultion probably works OK, but I don't like it
>because it's kinda an ulgy fix!

The rollers outside the SH look just like those on the R8 interlock setup so I'm used to that. What is truly ugly is that black JJ Strong was showing. Does anyone know if that is the standard on new production? (Is there any new production?)

Brad admitted:
> will know. He knows everything.

Wow...we agree on something!


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-10-2002 04:27 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The reason? As far as I can tell, economics. The R-3 now works for both JJ and SA operation. No need for two soundheads to be available.

The noted film damage did indeed occur on the soundhead (excessive film curl would have the picture area rub the middle of the film). However, I have never found a situation where this couldn't be adjusted out.

I am with Brad on this one, I MUCH prefer running the 70mm film through the soundhead rather than around it. Unlike on other 70mm machines (like Norelco or Cinemeccanica) the 70mm film path on the JJ (or even the Simplex PR-3570), the last sprocket moving the film out of the system is in the projector head itself. Each roller in the film path adds some amount of friction. Depending on one's platter placement and strength of the take up, this can cause the film to sag, bounce or even stall on it's way back to the platter.

One thing I'm happy to say is that Kelmar supports the R-50 soundhead (and R-20 for you standard drive lovers) so your 70mm film path can properly be routed though the optical soundhead on onto your take-up device (preferably a reel, of course ). You have to order the "JJ" version of the reverse scan reader but it works quite nicely.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 03-10-2002 04:28 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We ran Raiders 2 weeks ago at midnite. The print came from Paramount Classics and was a nearly perfect recent print. Whatever you can get from Paramount or WB Classics will undoubtedly be better than what will be had from regular diatributors.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.