|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Technicolor....why?
|
Mike Jones
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 108
From: Birmingham, MI, USA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 03-13-2002 06:25 PM
I know this topic may have been broached before but I'm just sick and tired of it. I manage two theatres (an 8 and a 12 screen, two blocks apart). On an average week, we get approximately 5 screenings for promotional events and press screenings in addition to our weekly lineup, which could be another 5 prints. What frustrates me is when Technicolor gives us our print of Harrison's Flowers for a Tuesday night screening and we're scheduled to open it on Friday, yet they want the print back so we have to break it down and build a whole new print. There was nothing wrong with the film, so to have to waste an extra 2 hours because Technicolor wants to circulate their prints around is absurd. It costs them many too, by wasting man hours trying to track the prints and getting Airborne to do all the shipping.When all is said and done, I bet we get the same print back. Come on Technicolor, clean up some of this inefficiency!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Kraus
Film God
Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 03-14-2002 11:39 AM
Bill ordered "Shields Up!" and defended TES: >Technicolor is probably moving prints per the distributors orders.Exactly. One hopes they point out the silliness and inconvenience of these moves but I would like to ask someone of long experience whether or not this sort of thing was the norm in the bygone reel to reel age. Maybe this is the way they always ran previews. If so then this is simply the reality of the business and if a theatre chooses to go to a single projector then this is one of the downsides just like long Thursday nights. Similarly, it's kind of ridiculous to blame TES for lack of inspection or the "integrity inspected" issues if that is only what the studios are paying for. As long as the studios are not being misled then any complaints should go to them and not TES. There are plenty of things to complain about regarding TES (the broken reels, for one) and Airborne (pickup policies) but when they're following orders from the studio then you're barking up the wrong tree to bitch about TES.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-16-2002 05:31 AM
Isn't this is an issue that NATO could easily address, given that it seems to be such a univerally vexing problem? Surely the exhibition industry can make a point of how costly and illogical the system is and insist distribution remedy it. Then the other question is, who orders the sneak? It is the theatre saying, yeah, we want in on that sneak, or it is the distributor saying, if you want to book this or that title, you have to play a sneak? I don't work in a commercial setting so I don't know the logistics of how this sneak thing works. If it is the theatre wanting to play the sneak, then in lieu of the studios making any changes in the present sneak system, the exhib needs to evaluate the cost of running that sneak -- booth overtime for makeup and breakdown, the inevitable late charges when it can't physically be done for the next day ship-out, etc. Maybe it might be better to just say, "hey, if we can't keep the print for our normal run, or if you can't give us a full 24 hours to break it down, then we won't run it." Problem solved. It's simply a matter of economics. If it is the studio demanding that a sneak be played, then as the exhibitor I would charge back to the distributor any costs that running the sneak forces me to incur. We run sneaks, but it is out of the publicity offices of the distribs. They pay US to use our theatre to promote their product. If I have to keep a projectionist an extra 2 hours on overtime to get a print ready for a next-day ship-out, you can be sure that is going to be tacked on to the total rental fee I charge them. TES ususally has Airborne pickup two days, sometimes more, after we play the sneak. Then again, there were a few times they just forgot to put us on the rotation and left a print for over a week. Another time they returned it to us a few days later, even though we weren't playing it other than the one night sneak showing. Evidently this isn't as scientific a system as one might think. Frank
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|