|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: 70mm Sound Formats
|
|
Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-31-2002 07:47 PM
Oh, Michael, this is one of those "can of worms" questions that have endless answers. I'll give some of the basics, and leave the details to others.Going back to the Fox Grandeur process in the 30's, you can find mono optical. Wonder if there are any machines out there that could play this format? As for mag, I'm sure there are examples of everything from 1 to 8 channels at least. There is a lot of dispute about 7-8. There is a big debate on rec.arts.movies.tech right now about 8-channel 70mm films. Some claim they exist, and some claim they don't. This is one of those topics that creates endless arguments. It's like the argument of Cinerama having 8 tracks of sound, but actually there were 7 with an operator manually switching one of the surround tracks to a rear speaker (on THIS IS CINERAMA). The basis for modern 70mm sound is the classic Todd-AO setup, with 5 screen channels and 1 surround. My friend from Lake Erie, Jeffry L. Johnson, usually pops in with these Dolby Mag formats...these are from one of his previous postings: 70MM COMPOSITE MAGNETIC 40 70mm 6 track (Conventional 6 Track, no NR, Mag Filters) 41 Dolby 70mm Wide (6 Track, A-Type NR, Widerange all 6 Channels) 42 Dolby 70mm Baby Boom (6 Track, A-Type NR, Baby Boom Channels 2 & 4) 43 Dolby 70mm Stereo Surround (6 Track, A-Type NR, Baby Boom/Stereo Surround) 44 Dolby 70mm Wide (6 Track, SR NR, Widerange all 6 Channels) 45 Dolby 70mm Baby Boom (6 Track, SR NR, Baby Boom Channels 2 & 4) 46 Dolby 70mm Stereo Surround (6 Track, SR NR, Baby Boom/Stereo Surround) There is also now 70mm-DTS, which seems to be a very good system. That is the format that I would most like to see, but I doubt there will be any more than a handful of these, at most. Dolby has stated 70mm-Dolby Digital is possible, but I'm not aware of any production plans. Any 70mm-Dolby digital presentation have been with 70mm film and 35mm Dolby Digital synched (Lion King at Radio City is one example...Disney did a few premeires this way.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 06-01-2002 08:32 AM
Went to that Film Sound link (thanks!).I always read that Fantasound (Disney's one-time setup for the original "Fantasia" road-show) was a 9-track system...or was it just 9 loudspeakers? ------------------ ~Manny. Some people can read "War and Peace" and come away thinking it's a simple adventure story while I, on the other hand, can read the ingredients on a chewing gum wrapper and unlock the secrets of the universe. Lex Luthor, "Superman: The Movie"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-01-2002 02:02 PM
"Fantasound" was originally a three channel process (left, right, surround, and a fourth track for control). "Fantasia" was the first commercial film release to feature stereo sound."Baby Boom" is just a nickname for Format 42. The two subwoofer channels are limited range "miniature" .1 channels, making it a 4.2 channel process. Funny joke about the movie "Baby Boom", although it had no 70mm prints (I think it was just plain Dolby A). There is dispute about "Apocalypse Now" having a special sound format. The film was the first to publicly show the 70mm Format 43 process, which holds both 4.2 and 5.1 channel mixes on the same print ("Superman" was mixed for the process, but no Format 43 prints were publicly shown). Some point to ads for "Apocalypse Now" that claimed "8-channel quintaphonic sound" which alone is kind of odd in that quintaphonic really implies 5 channels. If it were 8 channels then it would be octophonic. Maybe SDDS would have been more successful if they had a whimsical octopus cartoon mascot. Hehe. We all know about newspaper ads for films getting technical information wrongly displayed. I think the 8-channel ad on "Apocalypse Now" is just another example. Lately it seems most of the newspaper stack ads in most cities just don't list technical information anymore. If they can't do the job right they won't do the job at all.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Kraus
Film God
Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 06-01-2002 10:00 PM
The Fantasound tracks were L,C,R, carried on an interlocked 35mm optical track with 4 double the normal width tracks. (The 4th track carried control tones to expand--that is, regulate the level--of the three audio tracks.) Sound was moved into other speakers in the auditorium by way of notches on the edge of the sound film.Apocalypse Now was Format 43 Stereo Surround. This business about some other track arrangement was argued recently in news://rec.arts.movies.tech and is simply untrue. Quoting from Larry Blake's R/EP article (later reprinted in his 1984 "Film Sound Today" compilation) about the A.N. sound mix: Tom Scott was hired to scout and supervise the installations for the 70mm roadshow engagements. ... Scott also had a channel placement film to make sure that everything was where it should be. ... Such a test reel was especially important because tracks #2 and #4 contained low-frequency "boom" information below 200 Hz and, above 500 Hz, high-frequency information for the left and right surrounds. That is the definition of Format 43 and the article specifically describes A.N. as the first film to use this format. I think it's about time this issue was put to rest.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|