Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Deluxe (UK) new shipping cases? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Deluxe (UK) new shipping cases?
Rob Jones
Film Handler

Posts: 44
From: Swindon, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 06-06-2002 07:15 AM      Profile for Rob Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Rob Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi,

Have Deluxe Perivale started using new shipping cases? We usually get a crappy cardboard box or if you're lucky one of those 'easy carry' green boxes, but today we got a funky new red plastic one complete with black fastening strap and metal handles.

If they are new I'm not sure how well they'll hold up. They certainly look more durable than the cardboard ones and they don't look as though the cans will shake around like they do in the green boxes but I'm just wondering how long they'll hold together before falling appart.

Rob

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-06-2002 07:34 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any chance of posting photos of the new packaging?

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-06-2002 09:46 AM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rob

Yes we got two of these today as well. Lets see what they look like in a couple of months time!!

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Muirhead
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Galashiels, Scotland
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 06-06-2002 06:20 PM      Profile for Andy Muirhead   Email Andy Muirhead   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I haven't seen these new boxes yet, interested to see what there like.

Rob, i hope you were being sarcastic when you said "those 'easy carry' green boxes"! I'd choose cardboard boxes over those any day when it comes to carrying them.



 |  IP: Logged

Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-06-2002 06:31 PM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I usually get either the green cases or the cardboard boxes as described.

But we are closed for the summer, last film was 19th may, next will be mid september. I'll have to see what arrives.

quote:
Rob, i hope you were being sarcastic when you said "those 'easy carry' green boxes"! I'd choose cardboard boxes over those any day when it comes to carrying them.

*nods*


 |  IP: Logged

Rob Jones
Film Handler

Posts: 44
From: Swindon, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 06-07-2002 05:57 AM      Profile for Rob Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Rob Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John - I'll try and take a snap of one when I next have my camera around.

They're only easy to carry if you're hard and you carry two of 'em one handed with just one of the handles, briefcase style

 |  IP: Logged

John Moriarty
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-07-2002 05:59 AM      Profile for John Moriarty   Email John Moriarty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well here are the pictures as promised.

Don't imagine it has anything to do with the new cases, but this is the first film to arrive in one of these, and the first time I have had one arrive with a crushed center. As I say, probably nothing to do with the case, but a bad omen.

Can't say I am too sure about the design mind. The reels in the top get to rattle about a bit (the lid being wider than the bottom). The fastening seems less sturdy than I would have expected, the plastic buckle things never normally last and the velcro (for changing the size, the box adapts for different no. reels) seems likely to wear out.

John


 |  IP: Logged

William Phillips
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 117
From: Cardigan, Wales, UK
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-07-2002 01:33 PM      Profile for William Phillips   Author's Homepage   Email William Phillips   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They look like souped up versions of the ones the BFI use.
Why did they get rid of the metal cases. Easy to cary .
Drop proof ( film transport ) and best of all you got some good cuts on the legs

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-07-2002 05:09 PM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting

What does it look like the maximum number of cans per container will be?

By looking at the 2 pics:

Has the same problem as cardboard boxes. In that, first you have to remove all of the cans to see what order the reels are in. Not a problem with the green cases. (I have never understood how in a cardboard box the order can be strange eg 145263)


 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-07-2002 08:10 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

Are there TWO handles on the cover?

If so, it looks safer to carry the box upside-down, by the two handles, rather than as shown, with all the weight stressing a single
strap and buckle.

If there's but a single handle, it will soon rip off, or the box will tear. I don't see paper reel bands or cardboard separators between reels to prevent scuffing in shipment. Perhaps the bottom line in this design is to save postage by lightening the overall weight,
rather than the protection of the print. Might be satisfactory for a
single delivery, but not likely to withstand repeated use.

Reminds me of the fibre shipping containers used for decades for 16mm
prints--but they were on reels inside cans within the shipping cases,
which had two crossed webstraps fastened with metal buckles.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-07-2002 08:16 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"I don't see paper reel bands or cardboard separators between reels to prevent scuffing in shipment."
The rolls are individual cans

 |  IP: Logged

John Moriarty
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-08-2002 03:19 AM      Profile for John Moriarty   Email John Moriarty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Has the same problem as cardboard boxes. In that, first you have to remove all of the cans to see what order the reels are in.

Correct, having got all the cans out and sorted them , I found the film was tails out, so had to shuffle them round again. From this perspective the green boxes were much better.

quote:
Are there TWO handles on the cover?

Yes, one on the other side. I found it quie awkward to carry by the handles anyway, so ended up carrying it with my hand underneath anyway.

quote:
I don't see paper reel bands or cardboard separators between reels to prevent scuffing in shipment.

The reels are all in individual plastic film cans, wound on cores. Films have always come that way over here.

It's also not shown on the photo but worth mentioning that the lid is hinged by the continuation of the strap (which goes under the base and is fastened to the lid on the other side). This is to allow the hinging to adapt to more or less reels. As to number of reels, I'll experiment later.

As to wether this is an economy dirve, it's hard to say. It is certainly more compact than the green boxs (which had lots of unusable space in them and only held six cans), so presumably will save on shipping (esp. given it will take more cans). I can't beleive however that they will recover the difference over cardboard boxes until the boxes have had a lot of use, which presumes they last long enough.

Hope this clears a few things up

John

P.S. They take 8 cans. (edit)


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-11-2002 07:19 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
8 full 2000-foot rolls of 35mm film weigh about 80 pounds (36 kilograms). IMHO, that's much too heavy for such an unbalanced load.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-11-2002 08:23 AM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John P said :
"8 full 2000-foot rolls of 35mm film weigh about 80 pounds (36 kilograms). IMHO, that's much too heavy for such an unbalanced load."

By coincidence the first day we received these new cases we received a letter from Securicor , who carry most Deluxe film titles,about new guidelines with regard to handling heavy parcels and also about surcharges for parcels over 31.6kg.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-11-2002 08:31 AM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe I read something a while back about a clause in the United Parcel Service union contract that limits the package weight a single worker is required to lift to 70 lbs. (UPS is the largest truck delivery service in the USA)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.