Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Attached trailers done wrong (Minority Report) (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Attached trailers done wrong (Minority Report)
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-19-2002 09:33 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On my print of Minority Report, the "attached" trailer was attached to the feature by means of a really poor quality single-sided tape splice.

Worse, it was out of frame, as were the cuts on both the head of the feature and the tail of the trailer.

What were the lab or depot people thinking? (or not thinking....) It's stuff like this which makes me glad that I always make a practice out of checking for mis-framed splices.


Did anyone else have problems with this? I'll be inspecting another print of this tomorrow night at a different theatre...hopefully things will go a bit better there.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-19-2002 10:27 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I see this all the time and it drives me crazy! Almost always the bonehead splicing on the new "attached" trailer chops right into the audio of the opening fanfare too. Frequently with Fox, they find that first visible frame (well into the drumroll) and chop it there. It seems misframes happen about 10% of the time with the prints I get.

If the opening studio logo is chopped, demand a new reel 1. If the trailer is chopped at the beginning or end or has any marks on it (a common occurence), toss it in the trash and only play that trailer when you get a new copy. That's my policy.

 |  IP: Logged

Kyle Caudill
Film Handler

Posts: 92
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 06-19-2002 11:56 PM      Profile for Kyle Caudill   Email Kyle Caudill   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of my prints of Scooby Doo has the WB name at the end of film before the credits on reverse. It appears upside with soundtrack showing.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-20-2002 12:42 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I dismantled a print of Star Wars EP II, I noticed the attached trailer was spliced on with tape that must have been at least two inches wide, both sides. Kind of an overkill, but it ran through the machine ok for 6 weeks.


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 06-20-2002 02:12 AM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wasn't it Star Wars that had the tail still on the attached trailer? I remember a print, not to long ago with that. Maybe it was a Star Wars trailer...Either way, i'm sure it was a fox movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 06-20-2002 12:54 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen this on a few different Fox prints- the ONE time I didn't check to make sure an attached trailer was spliced on in-frame (Moulin Rouge), sure enough it turned out to be out of frame so I had to go back and fix it, taking more time than it would have if I'd checked it!
The funny thing about this movie was the note saying not to cut off the black space at the beginning of the movie, and to make sure it doesn't cut off they suggested leaving the attached trailer as-is- since the theater had a policy trailer and it was tape-spliced anyway I undid the splice and stuck in the policy trailer (but didn't check to make sure it was in frame).


 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-21-2002 12:00 AM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Fox Combo trailer on my print of MINORITY REPORT was also spliced on with tape (one side) and it was "flopped" (the soundtracks didn't match up).

Oh yeah...and it had those ugly frames at the end with the white edge.


 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Skallan
Film Handler

Posts: 65
From: Littleton, CO, USA
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-21-2002 04:17 AM      Profile for Jeff Skallan   Email Jeff Skallan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This audio deletion with Fox prints has irritated me for some time now. While working with my prints of Minority Report tonight I came across the same poor splicing job that seriously compromises the presentation. I'd venture to say that there was at least a full second of audio missing from the beginning of the FOX logo. The attached combo trailer was spliced on booth sides, but was cut out of frame.

Maybe the monkey who played the movies in the movie Waking Life has now taken up employment with Fox! I just wonder if Speilberg is aware of how crappy this looks on movie screens around the globe playing his movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-21-2002 05:43 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually I thought the entire movie looked terrible, and the Fox fanfare on this one was as lame as ever. I've about had enough with this visual artistic nonsense of cloudy, overexposed and bleached images. The funny part is, the prints are on Vision PREMIERE film stock! Why??? There is no good reason for this.

By the way, I saw something tonight I have never seen. One of the reels stuck together and the emulsion peeled when the layers were unraveled. It looked like dark reddish blobby painted marks across the image. Very weird. I will try and get a couple of shots of the damage once the reel is changed out.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 06:05 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad said: "By the way, I saw something tonight I have never seen. One of the reels stuck together and the emulsion peeled when the layers were unraveled. It looked like dark reddish blobby painted marks across the image."

Sounds like the print was not fully dry when it was wound up at the end of the processing machine. The wet gelatin emulsion acts like glue, and sticks together, delaminating when it is unwound. Obviously, request a replacement reel.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-21-2002 09:16 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As for last night: different theatre, different print, same film, same crappy out-of-frame splice. Grr.

What's up with the washed-out look? Were these bleach-bypass prints? They had some of the good characteristics of 2393 stock (e.g. density) and were super-sharp, but the colors looked very desaturated. Weird.


 |  IP: Logged

Jason Burroughs
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 654
From: Allen, TX
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-21-2002 09:21 AM      Profile for Jason Burroughs   Email Jason Burroughs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I must be one of the fortunate ones. The attached trailer I recieved was spliced on both sides, but using wide splicing tape, sountrack to soundtrack, and in frame. Also plenty of lead into the Fox fanfare. I've always hated when they spliced a trailer onto a feature like that. They should just stick it in the can with the other dozen trailers.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 09:29 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AFAIK, Spielberg and Kaminski used Technicolor's proprietary "ENR" silver retention process for the prints to achieve the "look" they wanted.
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/processing/skip.shtml
http://www.cameraguild.com/awards/kaminski.html
http://www.theasc.com/magazine/nov98/soupdujour/pg1.htm
http://www.cinematography.net/bleach.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 06-21-2002 04:10 PM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mine was cut right and spliced correctly, and cleanly i might add, but they left the white edged frames, so i had to re-do it anyway.

As far as the fox / dreamworks intro: I finally got to use the "Uh oh, we're out of Technicolor" line. I like it when the studio's allow their logo to be manipulated to fit the film. Has anyone else noticed the Columbia Tristar woman is wearing ray-bans in the MIB-2 trailer?

-adam

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-21-2002 05:17 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did I miss something or was that combo trailer supposed to have an "X-Men 2" teaser? Mine only has teasers for two movies ("Solaris" and "Daredevil") even though the DTS disc says it's a triple-header combo teaser trailer.

My audiences are groaning because of those short teasers for movies that aren't coming out till next year. They don't seem to like this practice. They groaned during the combo trailer that came with "The Phantom Menace" as well.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.