|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Dynamic Range Limiting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug
Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 06-21-2002 03:39 AM
Heya Greg, I agree with you. Let's keep it on topic. If ya can't say something constructive and on topic, then F**K Off! If I was a worrywart, I would be more concerned about the aspect ratio and screen size than the audio.Just for reference, 99% of the new video monitors/TVs have a setting that boosts the dialog and/or center channel so it is understandable by using some sorta compression. Also, while limiting/compression is lightly used in FM it is the STANDARD in AM broadcasting. Many theaters do not have the audio amplifier watts (and speakers) to reproduce high-level sound without clipping.... you know, when those pesky "clip" LEDs on the amps light up on the loud passages. I hope that will change in the future. (The systems I have designed have 27 to 35 kW of audio power which seems like an over-kill, but they do not distort and clip and are kick-ass clean) Anyway Greg, a lot can be said for compression. The old tube-type compressors like the Gates "Level Devil" go for buco bucks and are used in many soundtracks. While I agree it is desirable to reproduce both the image and the sound as originally intended, there has to be a compromise based on the available venue and media...both in film and video...but the goal is the best it can be. >>> Phil
| IP: Logged
|
|
Matt Close
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 226
From: Hervey Bay, QLD, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 06-21-2002 04:56 AM
Mark ... I have to agree with Greg re: the phugging of one's self. It's something you should seriously consider. Correct me if I am wrong people, but I believe Mark has done little other than flame and complain since he appeared on FHF. ...... hmmmmmmm , hang on .... it was about the time of all the heated EP2 discussions wasn't it? Mark Lucas...... George Lucas? ... connection? hmmmm .... What is it you actually 'do' Mark? You call yourself a film handler, yet you list your occupation as 'sleeping'???? If you do actually work in a cinema, I would suggest that 'you' and your 'sleeping attitude' are part of the problem that threatens film ... a medium you obviously have zero passion for! .... which begs the question, why participate in the FILM handler's forum? It also seems to me, and I am sure to others, that you are mis-informed, unwilling to evaluate the pros and cons for 'both' sides of an issue, and your oppinions suffer from what would appear to be the 'tunnel vision' of youth.... I'd be surprised if you are even over the age of 17. *rant over*
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|