|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: 16mm projectors
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8864b/8864b8bd2c2a3a3324a08303d15d07445f1a4a1e" alt=""
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 09-10-2002 02:05 AM
I would avoid ANY Auto-Shred 16mm projector, period!By the way, what you going to use it for? There are some very nice professional-grade 16mm machines out there, but they can be very expensive, too. If you plan to use it in a public enviroment such as a theatre, I would recommend a machine that has an intermittant movement rather than the "claw", which is the standard shuttle.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a56b2/a56b230d54119a417c93dc043a8699cb982c08e8" alt=""
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 09-10-2002 02:09 AM
I'm not a fan of Hell & Bowells either, but about the one thing which can be said for them is that the most recent generation have an electronically adjustable speed (18 and 24fps) which can be useful for silents.My personal favourites are Eiki portables, tbough again, without the auto-load mechanism. Threading and operating is straightforward and routine maintenance (e.g. replacing lamps and belts) is dead easy. The entire film path is readily accessible and therefore can be kept clean very easily. Eikis are also very tolerant of shrunk and brittle stock, and will put up with most dodgy joins. For full-scale cinema use, I'd say that the big Fumeos (e.g. the HL-3000) have a slight edge over Eikis for picture stability, although I found that they are ruthless to shrunk or brittle film. You could only really trust them with prints in near-perfect condition. As Paul said, an intermittent-based machine is ideal but they cost very serious money. The Philips/Kinoton FP-18 gives a beautifully steady picture and is very kind to any sort of film stock in virtually any condition. But lacing up is quite fiddly, maintenance jobs which should take 10 minutes have a habit of taking an hour, and the price of spare parts would give George Soros a heart attack.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fabf7/fabf708b9c9cf67f12e9d9a4325934c427a855f9" alt=""
Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 09-10-2002 10:59 AM
quote: Was that Strong arc lamp a special model? I thought it was just a basic Strong Utility lamp.
Steve, I'm fairly certain they were Strong Juniors. ------------------ Better Projection Pays!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|