|  IP: Logged

Josh

I can't help wondering if this is the film industry's answer to Ken Livingstone's congestion charges. He is the extreme left-wing, motorist-hating Mayor of London who, from next February, intends to charge everyone £5 to drive into the city centre. In order to make this politically more acceptable, he's changed the traffic light programming to create gridlock, the idea being to change it back again when the charge starts so that everyone will think that the policy is actually achieving lower traffic congestion.

Could the same principle be in use here, i.e. these shitty prints are being foisted upon us so that when digital comes in everyone thinks it's wonderful, even though the standard will have been dumbed down massively relative to what a decent 35mm print can deliver?

Sorry to hear of that problem. Labs will usually replace reels with excessive amounts of "white" dirt. What type of print stock was used (look at the magenta colored edgeprint)? I don't find MBFGW on any of the lists of releases using Kodak print film, but sometimes the labs don't tell Kodak what film is being used for a particular production, especially for the smaller distributors like IFC.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

 |  IP: Logged

 |  IP: Logged

The print is grainy and soft and has a constant gitter to the image, not exactly a jump. I'll try for another print but from what I've read so far I doubt I'll get one.....

I'll not be able to sit thru the rehersal run as I've other things to do with my time... all I can do is check it every 10 or so min.

I guess any other problems will come to light during the public screenings....

Also rehearsing Road to Perdition in our THX screen.... looks great...

 |  IP: Logged

When I get the chance I'll sit thru the film, and see if anything else jumps out of the screen at me.

Wish I had the time to sit thru all prints and actually watch them but time and finacial considerations dictate otherwise.

As in the computer software industry, Jo public have to act as our beta testers and report the faults to us. We have become a reactive rather than a proactive industry. We open films on a Fiday so any complaints cannot be acted upon until Monday at the earliest. If a 'new' print is available it may not arrive until nearer the end of the week. With the way prints are fast processed today the chances are the replacement print will either be the same or have other defects on it.

The movie was catching on with the public when I saw it and as far as I can tell, the print looked like an average low budget film. Since all of the existing prints were made from a master internegative or positive, I do not think an effort will be made to tweak the original negative source and strike new prints for all the theatres playing the movie just because it had turned into a big hit. As far as the sound is concerned, the Dolby SR soundtrack is just fine because the movie features mostly dialogue just like Woody Allen's films. At lease "MFGW" has a stereo soundtrack. Woody Allen advertises his films as SRD, DTS, and SDDS but in actuality they are all big fat MONO films!

Although the theatrical prints lacks the look of a high quality film, I expect the DVD to have a much better picture quality when it is released.

Every print of MBFGW I have seen bounces all over the place. Then again, what else would you expect from DeLuxe Hollywood?

"Not bad enough to annoy the average customer, but still very upsetting to those of us who know how good "Film Done Right" can look."

Thats exactly how I feel, all I can do is cover my back by passing it on to our print manager so that if any complints do come in I'm covered. Thats all I seem to be doing recently, covering my back all the time.