|
|
Author
|
Topic: 16mm Booking
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-20-2002 09:12 AM
I would expect that 16mm prints will be available of most mainstream titles for at least a few more years. It provides a way for the nontheatrical distributors to release the titles in advance of the general video release date to non-35mm venues with less risk of piracy than if they sent out videotapes or DVDs.
Having said that, the nontheatrical market seems to be slowly fragmenting at this time. The "serious" organizations already have 35mm or can acquire good used equipment for about the same price as new 16mm xenon equipment, thanks to the many recent theatre closings. Meanwhile, the organizations which never cared much anyway probably already have access to video projection equipment--most colleges and institutions already have the capability for other purposes--and likely don't want to deal with film anyway and probably always had crappy presentations when they did run film.
I occasionally run 16mm at a local college. They have a great theatre built only a few years ago, primarily for live productions, but also film, lectures, etc. They have all sorts of nifty equipment: computerized lighting board, counterweight fly system, great sound booth, video projection, big screen, etc., but they have only 16mm projection capability, using a nearly-new pair of Eiki 1kw machines, complete with CinemaScope lenses. I can't help but wonder why they did that, since they could have easily put in a pair of rebuilt Simplexes or Centurys for about the same price and gotten much more for their money as far as picture and sound quality. They don't run anything that isn't also available in 35mm, so that's not the reason. There's no training issue, either, since they hire experienced projectionists to run film there, anyway. I don't get it.
As much as I hate to say it, I'd rather watch DVD or decent quality videotape, like Beta SP on a high-end video projector (DLP or similar) than a beat-up 16mm print run by morons who don't understand basic concepts like "focus" and "changeover." I do believe that 16mm is a great camera format for 35mm blowup or TV broadcast, but it is often abused as an exhibition format, unfortunately.
As a side note, another local college where I have run film has one of the best film screening rooms in the area (2x 35mm Kinotons with ISCO lenses for all formats, 1x 16mm Eiki xenon machine, CP500, etc.), but usually just runs VHS tape on a DLP projector. The nontheatrical market is just weird.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|