my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby SRD overhead channel (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Dolby SRD overhead channel Brad Morris Film Handler Posts: 29 From: Los Angeles, CA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 12-07-2002 10:33 PM                     A friend who works for Dolby in LA told me about a theatre in Arizona that ran We Were Soldiers with a discreet track for overhead speakers. The SRD track has room for 18 channels with 2 reserved for visual/hearing impaired info. Does anyone know anything about this, or at which theatre it was? Cheers- Brad  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 12-07-2002 11:00 PM                        Here is the Dolby press release about the overhead channel: Dolby Overhead Cannel The overhead channel is the fourth channel derived from the matrixed surround channels. I believe there was a discussion of the subject on this forum not so long ago.  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 12-08-2002 01:22 AM                        If SRD has room for 18+ channels, why do we have the wimpy matrixed EX rear surround instead of discrete?  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-08-2002 10:29 AM                        Hmmmm....18 channels -- let's see....5 up front, 5 on the rear wall, 2 on the left wall, 2 on the right wall, 2 in the ceiling and 2 under the seats. That should do it, unless director Randell Wallace can think of some other place he wants his helicopters blasting from some other location, perhaps in the middle of each patron's stomach. Given some of the reviews of this picture, it might be better for a director to worry a bit more about story line and character development than the sound of a helicopter coming from the ceiling. Frank  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 12-08-2002 02:48 PM                     The Dolby AC-3 encoding format is limited to six discrete channels. No more than that. One can apply matrixing methods to artificially create more faux audio tracks, but they would not be discrete. It would take a complex setup of three Dolby Digital units processing three separate AC-3 bitstreams to create a discrete 18 channel format. This is partly why Dolby Digital Surround EX is a 5.1 format and also why Dolby Labs could not counter DTS' ES-6.1 Discrete process for home theater with a true 6.1 format of their own. FYI, DTS CAC format for home theater can support up to 8 channels. Perhaps if Dolby were to develop a next generation sound process for commercial cinemas using the MPEG-2 AAC codec (which Dolby does promote and distribute) then a process using 18 discrete tracks would be possible. The Advanced Audio Codec can run in a very wide variety of bitrates and can feature as many as 48 discrete audio tracks in a single bitstream. Another advantage of AAC is it uses more efficient data compression techniques than even Dolby Digital AC-3. As it stands, AAC is mainly being used for things like Internet based or satellite based audio transmissions (typically only in 2 channel form). Some people feel AAC may, in the long term, supercede the MP3 format for storing compressed music material.  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-09-2002 08:55 AM                        Here's a question -- can I take an old Cat 150 matrix card and feed DTS or SRD Ls + Rs into it and derive the center surround that way? I've already got two center clusters on the back balcony wall as well as JBLs as hefty point-of-source surrounds in each corner (no wimpy side surrounds). I was even thinking of using my old Sansui Vario Matrix II decoder to extract Left Corner Surround, Left Center Surround, Right Center Surround and Right Corner Surround, getting two center rear channels instead of only one. Of course that would be over kill, winding up with more rear channels than behind-the-screen channels (although there is no reason why they couldn't matrix an two additional channels on the Lf & Rf discretes for 5 up front); I would be happy for a single center surround which I am thinking could be easily extracted from a matrix card, neatly jammed into a 1u rack case.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-09-2002 02:44 PM                     I have used old CP50's to give me EX with 1/3 octave eq on the surrounds  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-10-2002 12:28 PM                        Sweet.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 12-12-2002 08:48 PM                        Article by Smart on their overhead sound technology (covers both cinema and home-theater). Smart Overhead Channel  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 12-12-2002 09:20 PM                     This is so much overkill. Two or three surround channels are plenty, IMHO.  |  IP: Logged Ted Costas Expert Film Handler Posts: 119 From: Hollywood, CA, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 12-17-2002 06:00 PM                     In my humble, personal opinion, it sounded great on We Were Soldiers here in the Dolby LA Office Screening Room. As a matter of fact, I think the speaker is still on the ceiling, hold on a second, let me check... Yep, it's still up there. There just isn't a helicopter flyover like one with Dolby Surround EXG, that's EX plus the "voice of God" channel. I just made that up, by the way. Please don't be calling and asking for EXG, it doesn't exist... unless you are the director of We Were Soldiers. Yours, Ted Ted Costas Director Dolby Distributor Servives  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 12-17-2002 06:27 PM                     "Dolby EXG" actually kind of has a ring to it. Maybe I'll throw together a mock-up of a logo... "After experiencing Dolby*EXG, certain listeners needed an EKG."  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 12-17-2002 07:31 PM                        AWESOME! Great work Bobby! I demand to know what future releases will be in Dolby Digital EXG. I will start informing customers of this new technology right away and posting this great news on every internet forum I come across. (just kidding, Ted )  |  IP: Logged Ted Costas Expert Film Handler Posts: 119 From: Hollywood, CA, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 12-18-2002 04:24 PM                     See what happens when I open my big mouth... Very funny, Bobby. Joe, I would expect nothing less... How about some marketing slogans, "A sound system that will impress Him." "God Bless this theatre." "Got God?" Of course, these are not the opinions or expressed marketing campaigns of Dolby Labs or any of it's companies. Just me, Ted, lurking on the Film-Tech forums. "I want my EXG." Yours, Ted  |  IP: Logged Christos Mitsakis Expert Film Handler Posts: 242 From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-09-2003 06:57 AM                     In the current issue of Widescreen Review mag there is an article covering the Todd-AO/Soundelux and Dolby Laboratories's "Envelop" (Hight) channel regarding the presentation of "We Were Soldiers" in September 20 2002. The article concludes mentioning that "Star Wars II - Attack of the Clones" DVD release is full of Envelop channel material. Anyone ever heard the info that SWII was mixed with this extra channel? And If so on DVD, I suppose the theatrical release should be the same. Christos.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.