|
|
Author
|
Topic: Looking for 16mm equipment
|
Matthew Cunningham
Film Handler
Posts: 5
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 12-28-2002 09:26 PM
This post would probably qualify for the wanted/for sale section, but I'm not yet in the position to be buying anything yet. So, here's my query: I have been tapped by a friend in the arts community here in Seattle to find some quality 16mm equipment for an established venue that needs something other than school district level Bell & Howells. This is a place that shows one-of-a-kind prints (meaning the filmmaker brings in the cans of his/her only copy of his/her film), and archival prints that need special care. I'm looking for something that is NOT auto-thread or slot load. Trained operators will be using this stuff, so "complicated" threading patterns are not a problem. I've had good experiences with Eiki equipment, and I've seen (yet not operated) some nice looking Prevost 16mm projectors. Both of these examples are mounted on their own hefty pedestals and look/feel like they are damned expensive. I haven't been given a price range yet, given that I am supposed to be researching all this stuff. So what can I be looking at price-wise, and who can I trust to deliver a good product? Any help will be much appreciated, and keep in mind that these folks will likely be looking at a 35mm set-up in the near future as well...
Thanks, Matthew Cunningham
P.S. The group in question is a non-profit arts organization (if that affects service and price with some dealers).
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 12-29-2002 04:57 AM
Fumeo are good, as are Kinoton (very expensive) Eastman 25 have a very good reputation (I've never seen one) but I'm not sure about the spare parts situation now.
I never found the Eiki machines to be very good with old, shrunken prints, they were ok, I wouldn't say better than that, with decent prints. This refers to the 1500, 3000, 5000 etc., I haven't used the 6000 or later, which were a different design, and so, may be better.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 12-29-2002 03:07 PM
quote: Eiki's tend to dislike shrunk film Fumeo and Prevost(zies favorite16B) are work horse reliable units as are hortsons once you understand them
I know a place that had a Favorite 16B for a while. Very nice engineering, but the only time I saw a film progected from it I was disappointed with the light. They were running a 1600W horizontal lamp in it, which put less light on the screen than the 900W vertical Fumeo which replaced it. Because I have only seen one show with it, I don't know if the low light output was typical, or if there was something wrong. The machine I saw would only take 4000 foot spools, most cinema 16mm machines will take 6000 feet. This was the only 16mm machine I have ever seen with spool boxes on it!
For running 'difficult' prints I don't think there is anything to touch my old Bell and Howell 609, this has the old style small lens barrel b+H mech, and will run prints which other machines will not touch. It loses out however in terms of light output, and sound quality.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|