Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Line Scratching (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Line Scratching
Chris Byrne
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Kirwan, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 01-31-2003 09:12 PM      Profile for Chris Byrne   Email Chris Byrne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nine or so months ago, I came into work to discover a first run print had these hideous vertical line scratches at three different areas onb the screen. Similar to the old war films you occasionally see on TV.

On further inspection, I counted as many as 15 different scratches on the emulsion caused by this obvious misthread.

It had happened before that on another print about 12 months previous to this and after talking to those in the know, I was none the wiser.

I carried out some tests with rubbish film on that particular projector(Kinoton FP30D with basement reader) and found that in 12 different misthreads, the only result that favoured my theory was a misthread around the cowling of the reverse scan reader. That is that the projectionist had missed the first roller after the sound drum and the film had scraped along the metal cowling.

I have put this to some other Techs and they disagree saying that the sound would've been so bad that patrons would've complained. While in essence this is true, I don't know whether or not it could've been a nil session or what?

Does anyone else have any theories or answers to the above.

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Bartow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 287
From: Massachusetts
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-31-2003 09:32 PM      Profile for Jon Bartow   Email Jon Bartow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know of a couple of chains in the US that run ALL shows, no matter what. Is it possible that this misthread occured when no one was watching that showing? It doesn't have a DTS unit does it?

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-31-2003 09:55 PM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember that this happened to one of our prints of Stuart Little 2, it was so bad we junked the print.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Byrne
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Kirwan, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-01-2003 12:59 AM      Profile for Chris Byrne   Email Chris Byrne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah Jon,

I suspect that if this was the case (nil session), then the operator must have had the monitor turned down. I just can't picture any other scenario.

Also the reverse scan unit is after the gate and would not get picked up on screen until the session afterwards.

 |  IP: Logged

John Spooner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: South Australia, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-01-2003 09:33 AM      Profile for John Spooner   Email John Spooner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear Chris.
Were the scratches deep into the emulsion itself, also were they linear and parallel, or did they move about?
Also for our information, what are the latest results regards the xenon + cap discolouration.
Rebards, John Spooner. South Australia.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Byrne
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Kirwan, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-01-2003 07:45 PM      Profile for Chris Byrne   Email Chris Byrne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey John,

Yes they were linear and parallel, as though the emulsion was dragging against something fixed (i.e. cowling.)

Xenons are all good at this stage. Am fitting the remaining clamps tonight. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Jones
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: Geelong Victoria Australia
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-02-2003 09:16 AM      Profile for Stephen Jones   Email Stephen Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Chris,
The problem you are discribing can be caused by a misthread over the cover as I have seen the results of this a couple of times when projectionists new to the Kinoton sound head have mistreaded.But how they get the film there is a mystery as there is a metal piece which is there to prevent this, you would have force the film past it but nothing supprises me these days.The sound would have sounded bad with no digital at all and analog would have sounded garbled.I am running Kinoton FP50D's which have the same sound head as the FP30D. [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Byrne
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Kirwan, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-03-2003 04:00 AM      Profile for Chris Byrne   Email Chris Byrne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah Steve,

All of our units have the newer style cowlings with that modification that you talk about, however this particular unit has the older style cowling which doesn't!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-03-2003 04:38 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As you say, steady tramlines are caused by the film surface arguing with something fixed in the film path. This case sounds like a misthread, but tramlines can be caused by a small, sharp foreign body getting in the film path and these can be a pain to find.

I found that the best way to do it was to thread up about 50ft of 'virgin' stock (e.g. an extra copy of a trailer you ended up not needing), run the motor until it's up to speed, wait 2-3 seconds and then stop it. Unlace the film backwards (i.e. starting at the take-up spool and working upwards), and where the scratch stops indicates roughly the area in which the damage is being caused.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Byrne
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Kirwan, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-04-2003 08:15 PM      Profile for Chris Byrne   Email Chris Byrne   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leo, that's quite cool! I agree that intermittent faults can be a horse's ass!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-05-2003 08:27 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Compliments always welcome! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-05-2003 08:54 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When running a scratch test, view the film in a very bright, collimated beam of light, which makes even tiny scratches and abrasions very obvious. I like to hold the film in the projector's projected light beam, or that of a slide projector. A small narrow beam angle spotlight or halogen desk lamp (e.g., http://www.tensorlamp.com/lt590.html )also works well for seeing surface abrasions.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-05-2003 01:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Or you could always get yourself a piece of white formica (or perhaps a few pieces of printer paper taped together) and set it on the port window. That should be bright enough. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-05-2003 02:25 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Surface abrasions and scratches are easiest to see when illuminated by an oblique collimated light source. So a narrow beam spotlight or the light of a projection beam works very well. Reflecting the light off a surface makes the light more diffuse, reducing the visibility of tiny scratches.

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Curry
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: Garbutt, Queensland, Australia
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 02-07-2003 09:47 AM      Profile for Douglas Curry   Author's Homepage   Email Douglas Curry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have fairly keen eyesight and find the best way to 'find' scratches on a print is to have the light project onto the film at an angle, then rock the film backwards and forwards.. you'll generally see them 'glitter' at you [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.