Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Super Simplex lower magazine question

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Super Simplex lower magazine question

Author

Topic: Super Simplex lower magazine question

Mathew Molloy
Master Film Handler

Posts: 357
From: The Santa Cruz Mountains
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 02-14-2003 12:42 PM

I was just posed this question by a friend looking at Super Simplexes in the booth of an old theatre -

"...the upper magazines were normal but the lower ones were oversize with room for 3 or 4 small reels running at once. Do you know what this was for?"

Wish he sent me a picture but I don't have a clue based on the description.

| IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002

posted 02-14-2003 12:44 PM

I've got a few sets of magazines originally from Super Simplexes, all are regular size (single reel).

| IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 02-14-2003 12:57 PM

Sounds like the lowers are for 6,000-foot reels.

| IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002

posted 02-14-2003 01:02 PM

That makes sense. I was trying to imagine storage for two extra reels, BESIDE the one running. duh! [Smile]

edit: Hurray! I'm not going crazy.

| IP: Logged

Mathew Molloy
Master Film Handler

Posts: 357
From: The Santa Cruz Mountains
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 02-14-2003 01:15 PM

My first thought was 70mm but he told me they were smaller than 'normal' (ie 2 k's) and wide enough to hold 3-4 of these smaller reels? So I don't think it's a 6k version. I'm going to try to get in and take a look at these myself and get a picture.

| IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002

posted 02-14-2003 01:16 PM

What shape is the bottom box? If circular then it is probably a 4000, 5000 or 6000 foot box. If a strange shape it could be for three 1000 foot spools, take up for picture, and feed and take up for a separate track. I've seen a couple like this, a Westar at Bletchley Park, and a Kalee at, I Think, the Museum of London. Philips made a similar system in 16mm, but with three spools on top, and one at the bottom, sometimes known as a 'cloverleaf'. The National Film Theatre has these, but doesn't use the sound side of them now as it has Maga-tech followers for sep-mag.

| IP: Logged

Bob Koch
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 183
From: williams ca
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 02-14-2003 01:30 PM

This is a "preview attachment" used many years ago when the sound film was on a separate reel. It was threaded only thru the reproducer from the lower magazine and back.This was only used in key locations for an actual preview before release.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 02-14-2003 01:58 PM

Sometimes known as a "studio" projector, used for running double system sound.

| IP: Logged

Dick Prather
Master Film Handler

Posts: 259
From: Portland, OR, USA
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 02-14-2003 11:49 PM

Mathew,
That is indeed a what we called a studio lower magazine. One spindle was used as the regular or picture take up and the other two were for a seperate soundtrack reel. One spindle acting as a feed and the other as take up. There were cut outs in the projector and soundhead to bypass whatever was not used when duel film was used. The soundhead usually had a magnetic pick up in it. I don't remember if the sound spindles could take any more than 1000 foot reels.

I have a Super Simplex and SH-1000 modified this way with the three spindled lower magazine.

| IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 02-15-2003 09:07 AM

During my freelance days I also worked Preview Theatres, which were, all equipped with combined double head (cloverleaf) projectors. I showed many features in single 1000 foot or less reels, most separate track sound was magnetic, very occasionally optical. With mostly carbon arc lamps it could be hard work on your own. I used to enjoy doing media screenings at Bowater House in London’s snob Knightsbridge area, which was more like a luxury cinema with a balcony than a preview theatre. Also for the food and drink receptions afterwards. [Smile]

The Gaumont (now Odeon), Camden Town in London was one release cinema equipped with double head projectors. The 2nd feature would be replaced for one evening with a ‘studio sneak preview’ for audience reaction tests.

Dick, Separate sound was always limited to 1000 feet capacity. No doubt the later Philips follower soundheads could handle 2000 foot.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.