Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Open Rack - Closed Rack

   
Author Topic: Open Rack - Closed Rack
Mike Rendall
Film Handler

Posts: 78
From: Southampton, Hampshire, UK
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 02-18-2003 11:21 AM      Profile for Mike Rendall   Email Mike Rendall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Looking through the photo archive I see many american installations have open sound racks, i.e. all the rears of the devices are easily accessible. This I can see is good for certain maintenance applications, but don't you worry about cables getting snagged by accident? or dust etc? I prefer closed racks mainly because it keeps the cabling hidden out of view. What are other users preferences?

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 02-18-2003 02:24 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Open vs closed racking depends on many factors. Open racks are usually less than 1/2 the cost of a closed rack system. Most of the racks we manufactured in the past where closed style with about 10 - 15% open style. In some areas insurance cost was less to the cinema owner if the rack was a closed type.
Richard Fowler
Kinoton America Inc.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-18-2003 02:47 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Moving to FHF.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-18-2003 04:43 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I was running a both solo, or with a group of trusted, experienced workers I would much prefer having the backs of the racks open for better troubleshooting, maintainence and cleaning. I would contend that, because racks need ventillation, they would get just as dusty inside whether they have open backs or closed backs. Cleaning an open rack would be much easier... and since the dirt is more visible they would get cleaned more often.

On the other hand, if the booth is full of inexperienced people, leaving the rack open is just begging for trouble. Being able to lock the backs of those racks keeps many an "idle hand" from causing trouble. I have worked in both kinds of booths and have seen booths with no backs on the sound racks have few, if any, trouble due to tinkering. The common thread was the quality of the personnel.

Another good reason to have the backs on the equipment racks is aesthetics. If your booth is viewable from the outside, it might be nice to have a "clean-looking" appearence.

Then again, there's a lot to be said for the "coolness factor" of having a booth where the backs of the racks are visible with wires neatly bundled and routed for maximum visual appeal! (And hopefully functionality as well!) [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 02-18-2003 05:09 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our closed rack systems we did in 2001 - 2002 we had our rack vendor supply us with full vent perforated rear door for ventilation since most amplifiers where equipped with fans. I personally hate the rack systems equipped with the 10 inch fan at the top since most of these suck the dirt into the cabinet and fight the fan equipped amplifiers air flow.
Richard Fowler
Kinoton America Inc.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-18-2003 05:56 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Mmmm ... Filtered rack fans. You'll note that the one on the left is hideously filthy. [Embarrassed] Obviously, the one on the right has been taken apart to show the filter.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-18-2003 07:52 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Open (relay) racks are definately the inferior way to go. A closed rack with a proper filtered blower (in the bottom) to pressurize the rack is the proper way. You won't have a dust problem and your equipment will run nice and cool.

As to the 10" fan in the top...you mean the "dirt pump"...that is about all they are good for.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-18-2003 10:11 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Open (relay) racks are definately the inferior way to go. A closed rack with a proper filtered blower (in the bottom) to pressurize the rack is the proper way. You won't have a dust problem and your equipment will run nice and cool."

Steve,
What do you do with the power amps that take in air(and dirt) from the front? Do you reverse the flow of the fan on the rack to cover this and then just use a static intake filter?
More and more power amps seem to be going to that airflow route lately.... Crown is the only one I know that has any filters in place to cover that problem. Pressurizing the rack is fine as long as the power amps are taking in air from the INSIDE of the rack. Too much pressure in the cabinet will also impede these type power amps from being able to cool properly as the static output pressure(which is usually very small) would be fighting the racks much higher static air pressure.

P.S. I too vote for all enclosed racks. Almost all rack manufacturers make an inexpensive line of enclosed racks that list for way under $500.00....
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-18-2003 11:03 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In some locations an open rack is illegal since the possible voltage on the speaker terminals exposed) exceeds class B wireing

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-19-2003 07:43 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, whereas I only use QSC amps with proper "inside-out" cooling, that isn't a problem.

Any amp manufacturer that blows air into the rack is simply foolish. Think about it...you take cool air, heat it up with the amplifier, then send it into the rack to heat up other equipment? Just how stupid can you be?

As to Crown amps...watch out on their "grounds" on some models they aren't necessarily grounds and what you think your shield is connecting to isn't going to do much good. But they do have pretty blue LEDs on their CL line.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-19-2003 08:54 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually just flipping the fans around inside these amps will also take care of that problem. There are others out there other than Crown that cool from the outside to the inside as well....
Comming from a TV background where the entire stations rack system was force fed cooled air via the ceiling and the return was via the raised flooring. This was really a nice way to do things. I like any blue LED's...they seem to automatically draw atention to what ever one is mounted on. I'd have to credit Nelson Pass as being the first to use them in power ampliflers.

Having done alot of listening tests with different amps over the years on a high resolution home system I can honestly say that there are many commercial type amplifiers that are much better sounding overall than the QSC stuff, but I have found them adaquate and reliable and have pretty much given in to the QSC thing....QSC as a company also blows almost every other amp company out of the water.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Floyd
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1079
From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-19-2003 11:26 AM      Profile for Barry Floyd   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Floyd   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
P.S. I too vote for all enclosed racks. Almost all rack manufacturers make an inexpensive line of enclosed racks that list for way under $500.00....
Mark

OK, I need two of them.

Preferably wall mounted. Since I only have about 6 pieces of equipment to put in a rack, I don't really need anything big. I've seen some from Hubbel (sp?) that were like 24" tall, mounted on the wall, and hinge at the rear - so the whole cabinet swings out to access the wiring. They were listed as being for computer stuff, but I think they'd work in my application.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 02-19-2003 03:12 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Me, I'm cheap. I like open racks 'cause you can buy them for $100. brand new.

Barry:
Some wall mount cabinets don't have much depth for mounting sound equipment. Be sure to measure the equipment depth of what you'll be putting in the rack so you'll know if it will fit. Also, check out Mark's drive-in screen towers for sale on the Equipment forum here.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-19-2003 05:42 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, what Ken said. Those wallmount racks are pretty shallow.

They're pretty okay, though, if you're not trying to shove an amplifier in it.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Floyd
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1079
From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-19-2003 06:16 PM      Profile for Barry Floyd   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Floyd   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am looking for something like this

 -

or a larger version like this...

 -

I've found these particular models on the web for around $400.00 for the smaller one and $500.00 for the larger model.

Ken, I saw those screens Mark posted this morning and posted them over on the Drive-In Owners Forum. That post came about two weeks too late for me, as I've already ordered my screen from Selby, signed the contract and sent the check for a 30% deposit. The screen should be here in Tennessee in about 9 weeks.

Everyone told me Jerry knows how to build the best screens... and he sells them pretty good too! He and his wife offered to take us to dinner while we were in Florida and they even offered to babysit our boys so we could go out on the town! We turned him down on the babysitting job as I was afraid it would've made the cost of the screen go UP!... my boys are monsters!!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.