my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Strange Century H Focus probem (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Strange Century H Focus probem Fred Georges Master Film Handler Posts: 257 From: Lombard, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2000 posted 03-04-2003 08:37 PM                     This past weekend an Art Center I finished installing had it's maiden voyage. A film fest with 4 features (3-1:85 & 1-1:37)The final show went south due to a bad focus issue (Of course with several influential film critics in attendance) The problem was reported to me as a large almond shapped area of the film that would drift severely out of focus. The operater stopped the film several times and checked the gate as well as the lens and the problem persisted. I was NOT there. Upon hearing the tale I went to the theater and checked out the machine (Century Model "H" freshly rebuilt).Running RP-35 the image is Rock steady with excellent focus center to edge & edge to edge (90mm ISCO Ultra for 1:37) I then suspected a heat damaged print so I made up the whole Damn thing and watched it. Except for some minor base scratching the print was in very good condition and exhibited NO focus drift from start to finish. The lamphouse (Christie CL 20 with a strong reflector) has a nice flat field with no hotspotting (The 1:85 shows looked fine) I've tried to duplicate the conditions (Loose lense collar, leaving the gate not fully closed) to no avail. I'm calling it "operator error" but, what did He do??  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 03-04-2003 08:48 PM                     Is it possible there was some emulsion build-up, (perhaps from improper threading) which he later cleaned out of the gate/trap? How experienced is the operator? Would he know enough to accurately describe the problem? The reason I ask is: a person I know put in an anamorphic lens (for a flat film) but described it has being out of focus.  |  IP: Logged Jon Bartow Master Film Handler Posts: 287 From: Massachusetts Registered: Nov 1999 posted 03-04-2003 08:58 PM                     You say the final show went south. Does the lamphouse have a heat filter in it? Does the projector have a water cooled gate? What size lamp is it? How close together were the shows? Did the lamphouse get a chance to cool off between shows? Any chance of air blowing on the gate (booth door or porthole open?  |  IP: Logged Fred Georges Master Film Handler Posts: 257 From: Lombard, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2000 posted 03-04-2003 09:01 PM                     Thanks for the thoughtful reply John. The young man in question is one of the staff projectionists (35mm) at a major University here in Chicago. He comes off as knowledgable and I'm sure He used all of his skill to try and rectify the problem. I need to know the cause ( if machine related) to prevent any similar occurrance in the future But, I still think it was something screwy He did.  |  IP: Logged Fred Georges Master Film Handler Posts: 257 From: Lombard, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2000 posted 03-04-2003 09:06 PM                     Thanks Jon, 2K Lamp, Dichoric reflector, only show of the day. ALL other formats fine. Extra blower on lamp seal not causing gate turbulence.  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 03-04-2003 09:30 PM                        Thanks!  |  IP: Logged Fred Georges Master Film Handler Posts: 257 From: Lombard, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2000 posted 03-04-2003 10:04 PM                     Dear Daryl, I actually made two seperate responses to two seperate replys at different times. Should I have edited my second response into my first reply? Let me know and I'll correct it in the future (or now if you wish). Thanks  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 03-04-2003 10:39 PM                        No problem Fred! It is prefered that you keep replies in the same post if the replies are within a couple hours of each other. Just reference whoever's name to each part of your reply to make it clear who your replying to. There's many reasons for it... faster for dial-up users (they don't have to download more pages than necessary), it looks nicer, and it costs Brad less on his bandwidth bills (since each reply has a certain amount of 'extra code'). Leave it as it is, just remember to use the edit feature in the future. Thanks again, Daryl Oh yeah... don't forget to send in a photo of yourself!  |  IP: Logged Ray Bernardi Expert Film Handler Posts: 120 From: Antrim, NH, USA Registered: Feb 2003 posted 03-05-2003 04:09 PM                     Maybe you had a bug walking around on the lens!  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-05-2003 06:42 PM                     Fred, The best thing to do is throw the H gates and traps in the garbage and rummage around for a pair of SA gates and traps. Century only made those H's for about three years and discontinued them in favor of the Band style SA trap as it is auto equalizing. Get some crud buildup in an H and you're dead in the water till you clean it out, while an SA trap will compensate for it unless its boulder sized. Also, unless you set the side guides of an H trap very accurately they can cause focus problems of their own, sometimes by causing the film to cup while its running. This is what may have been happenning to you. Many dealers have tons of SA traps and gates laying around for a song and a dance as they come out for good with the installation of Kelmar Turretts. Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-05-2003 08:27 PM                        Having never seen an "H" in person, I must ask what, exactly, is the difference between the Century SA and Century H? Surely it must be more than just the gate/trap design, as the Centurys ("MSA/2" according to the nameplate) at the Williamsburg Theatre used to have H-style traps (which were basically just curved versions of the C-style trap). Older JJs have this type of trap as well.  |  IP: Logged Fred Georges Master Film Handler Posts: 257 From: Lombard, IL, USA Registered: Jun 2000 posted 03-05-2003 09:39 PM                     Dear Mark, I considered the upgrade to an SA style gate & trap but was seduced by the phenomenal picture steadiness this particular head exhibits. Still, after 3 days of trying every trick in the book to duplicate the problem without success I'm starting to believe it is a gate/trap design flaw that reared it's ugly head. To Scott, I have several SA Heads and the only differance I can see between it and the "H" is the gate/trap design & lens shift capability of the SA . Thanks for all the helpfull replys gentleman, A gate/trap switchout is on the Horizon as soon as the Art center can afford it. [ 03-06-2003, 09:44 AM: Message edited by: Fred Georges ]  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-05-2003 11:17 PM                     Fred, The SA stuff properly set up will yield a better picture, and as steady. The critical part of the SA thingy is that the runners are in excellent shape to keep the film from wandering about them....Even better use a pair of JJ heads for unparalled 35mm presentation...... Mark  |  IP: Logged Christopher Seo Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 530 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-08-2003 10:33 AM                     How similar is the H to the C? I just had a problem last night on a Century C with the film popping in and out of focus-- literally, it was instantly switching back and forth between sharp and blurry over most of the screen, at random. (The print has been running for 8 weeks without problems.) I discovered some hardened buildup, nearly impossible to see, tucked away along the inside of one of the studio guides. It wasn't a huge amount compared to what you can find after one pass through some projectors, but was it possibly enough to pinch the film and pop it in and out of the focal plane? I have never seen that sort of problem before.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-08-2003 03:34 PM                     Chris, There are big differences in the two models but the buildup that you found is most likely the cause of the popping of focus. The H uses a solid Curved gate and trap and the SA main frame and movement, while the C uses a solid straight gate and smaller movement. There are two versions of the straight gate too, but most have solid one piece pressure plates. Some older models had split pressure pads like the Simplex straight gate had. The older cast iron C's are probably the best American made projector in existance though. Also, some C's were retrofited with H gates and traps for improved focus with large lamp houses. The SA gate and trap can also be installed into a C with only a amall bit of work. The gear trains in all Centurys are virtually the same though. Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.