my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Pregnant Projectionist’s Policies

Author Topic: Pregnant Projectionist’s Policies Bill Langfield Master Film Handler Posts: 280 From: Prospect, NSW, Australia Registered: Apr 2001 posted 04-07-2003 08:38 AM                        Does anyone know of or have a policy on what female projectionist duties should be as they get further on in pregnancy? After a Projection/Management meeting today, things became ugly when this girl, who I trained from floor to projection started telling us (the other projectionists) during an informal chat outside the cinema that she would no longer be bending over to lace film to the lowest plate and will not pick up 6000’s, (With picking up reels/moving big films, she already knows floor staff will help as required ie LOTR) and a bunch of other things, like, ‘I will be calling in sick or late on morning shifts’, ‘On night shifts I will be arriving late, because I need a nap a 3pm’ Then said if she is rostered on a shift she does not like, she won’t show up. (She is about three months) Everyone stood there in stunned silence, as head projectionist I had to speak up with… ‘Is there anything you CAN do’ She said ‘watch your mouth’. With that she then stormed off to the treasury and quit. We were good friends until this happened. I really put effort into training her. To hear her telling me to ‘watch your mouth’ really hurt. Though we know (think) she will be back today (for night shift), hopefully she will be over it. If not, I have 2 other projectionist than can cover the shifts/do doubles, and I am in the middle of training two more, the guy is very ‘anal retentive’ (what’s that mean anyway?) and the other won’t have sex until she is married, so I’m safe on the pregnancy thing there for a while. This is a very short version of what happened. But what I’m mainly concerned with is on the top line. Basically how do I assign her lighter duties, without her totally using being pregnant as an excuse to do nothing? Bill!  |  IP: Logged Matthew Nock Film Handler Posts: 82 From: Bairnsdale, Victoria, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 04-07-2003 08:45 AM                     Hey Bill, firstly, if she is dictating what she can and cant do at only 3 months, then maybe she is best to just go back to floor duties for a while, and avoid doing things that require her to be in "difficult" positions. As a friend or not, "Watch your mouth" was inappropriate... And anally retentive? well, that means he is water tight! and as a kid, was good at holding supositories in... *grin* really, if she beleives that she cant do many of the tasks required of a projectionist during her pregnancy, and if she doesnt feel she can participate as part of the projection team, then its probably best that she moves to an area of the complex where she will be less stresed. Cheers, M@  |  IP: Logged Dick Vaughan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1032 From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK Registered: Jul 2000 posted 04-07-2003 09:00 AM                        Bill Not sure if you work for an individual cinema or chain. The best thing to do is to contact your personnel department/ health and safety rep. They should have some sort of policy regarding expectant employees and there will be national guidelines .You will probably find there is a requirement to make provision for regular breaks, regular working hours etc I recently had to go through this procedure with one of our employees and it involved regular risk assessments and health reviews. As her pregnancy progressed the work she was expected to do was adjusted. To add to the complications she was involved,normally, with moving IMAX prints. There may also be requirement to find her other duties within the organisation if she is unable /unwilling to carry out her usual job.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 04-07-2003 10:34 AM                        I think common sense should really be the order of the day, and it doesn't sound to me like Bill's colleague was showing much of it. I've never worked with a pregnant colleague in projection, but I have worked with one who had a six-month old daughter when I arrived. Unbeknown to me, my predecessor had walked out because of her unreliability and unreasonable demands for time off. There were only two of us, and time and time again my days off were ruined by panic 'phone calls resulting from her baby being unwell, her being unwell, and so on and so forth. I'm all for flexible working, but have seen too many instances of 'equal opportunities' in theory translating as unfairly positive discrimination in practice, especially in smaller workplaces where there are less staff to act as a safety net for someone not being able to deliver a full workload. For example, this person declared that from now on, she would not work any evenings or weekends so she could spend time with her child. Well I'm sorry, but working in cinemas is a job that requires evening and weekend working. If you can't do that, ever, at all, then you should find another job - it's as simple as that. That's not the line the management took, which was that she was legally entitled to basically come in and work when she liked and not when she didn't, and that I should take the consequences of that. I'm more than willing to help people through emergencies or who take a sensible, give-and-take approach to their flexible working needs, but not to selfish individuals who feel that their personal situation constitutes a licence to make your life hell. It seems to me that Bill's colleague falls into the latter category. I'm all for society supporting parents, but when it goes too far it can have a very negative effect on the economy. For example, I have a friend who runs a small business (7 employees), who has decided that in future, he simply won't take on any woman between 20 and 50. The reason for this is simple - the cost to his company of maternity leave and benefits is simply so high, relative to overall turnover, that it would risk sinking the whole business and thus losing six other jobs. To get round anti-discrimination laws he'll simply say, should the need arise, that another candidate was best suited to the needs of the post.  |  IP: Logged Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 04-07-2003 11:22 AM                     I would think that if an employee can't carry out the necessary duties of a job, then they should be given the opportunity to do something else. If they don't like that, there's the damn door! If she can't lift or bend, and that's understandable, maybe she can work a register? Perhaps even allow her to sit in a chair in the box office, even if that may be against policy. If she insists on working projection, but not doing ALL that is requirted, too bad. If she wants less hours, cut them down for her but tell her not to expect to get them back anytime she feels like it. A few weeks of that, and she'll quit for real. Which reminds me, you should also ask her if she is going to threaten to quit anytime she becomes dissatisfied with something and then expect to call in and everything to be ok. =TMP=  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 04-07-2003 11:33 AM                    There is a certain irony in the way the subject line currently reads "Pregnant Projectionist’s Policies" which means policies set by a pregnant projectionist as opposed to without the apostrophe which would mean policies for and about pregger booth women. The irony being who is dictating policy to whom! One hopes the latter is the case but with so many regulations and lawsuits sometimes it's difficult to tell!  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 04-07-2003 02:18 PM                     What Thoma's said. I'm all for bending the rule's a bit to keep good employee's. If she can't perform her dutie's in the booth and there i's an opening elsewhere, fine. Otherwise, a leave of absense or quitting is in order. If she quit's, it should be final and not just until her hormone's are under control again.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 04-07-2003 04:08 PM                     The guys have given you some good advise Bill. But another thing you might want to consider is her condition. As a father of nine I can tell you that a woman goes through a lot of changes when she is pregnant. Some are affected by those changes more than others. Perhaps it was her condition that caused her to lash out at you and maybe one day she'll return with apologies.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-07-2003 04:30 PM                     When I was training people who were too short to reach the center of the top platter deck I told them that they didn't have to use that deck if they didn't want to. I gave them step stools if they wanted them. If they needed it, I would even make them a "reaching stick" with a clothes pin on the end of it so they could put the film over the interlock rollers that ran right near the ceiling... Nail or tape a clothes pin to the end of a yard stick. Clip the end of the leader into the clothes pin and use it to reach the film up to the roller above their heads... I only had to make a reaching stick one time. Eventually, the person figured out how to do it without, using a step stool. We only interlock a film once or twice per year anyway. The point is that I did everything I could to help "differently-abled" people do their jobs as well as they can. All that aside, I think it's reasonable to assume that there are "minimum physical requirements" to be a projectionist. (Or to do most any job that requires physical labor.) Be able to reach and manipulate (objects) above your head, either without a stool/latter OR WITH a stool or ladder. Be able to reach and manipulate (objects) between your waist and the ground without assistance except for a cane or crutch, etc. Be able to lift an object, weighing 50 pounds or less, from the floor to waist level without help. Be able to carry said object over a reasonable distance, either without help or by using a cart or hand truck. Be able to lift an object, weighing between 50 and 100 pounds, from the floor to waist level with assistance of another person. Be able to carry that object over a reasonable distance, either by hand or by using a cart or hand truck. Be able to lift an object, weighing 20 pounds or less, from the floor to an overhead position, (such as putting a box onto an overhead shelf) either with help or without help from another person. Be able to climb and descend two flights of stairs with reasonable speed. Be able to walk a distance of 100 yards, continuously, with reasonable speed. Be able to jog a distance of 25 yards, continuously, with reasonable speed. Be able to manipulate small objects (as small as a dime) in the hand or pick them up from a table top. (or floor) Have reasonable vision and hearing, able enough to focus the screen and adjust volume either with or without glasses and hearing aid. Be able (nor afraid) to operate a machine with exposed moving parts. Be able (not afraid) to operate a machine that runs on high voltage electricity which has safety covers or interlocks to prevent contact with electricity. Be able (not afraid) to handle and use strong chemicals (similar to paint remover or house cleaning chemicals) in a safe manner when there is proper ventillaction. I have seen many more requirements posted as being prerequisites to getting a job. (Not necessarily in a booth.) These are just the ones that I think apply to being a projectionsist. Some, you might think are silly. Others, I may have forgotten. I don't see any reason why, if a person has special needs that these things can't be adjusted. Say, the "lift 50 pounds" rule... That could be lowered to 25, for instance. I would think that these are reasonable things to ask of a person who wants to work in a booth. I would think that a person who is ALREADY working in a booth would know them almost intuitively. Anybody who just comes out and says, "I'm not going to do <some task> anymore because I'm pregnant...", is just looking for a way to slack off. For cripes sake! She is only 3 months along! She CAN'T predict how physically able she will be to do ANY job at this early stage of the game! I've heard about women who are flat on their back in a hospital bed, only 5-6 months along! I've heard about women doing everyday activity right up to the day they deliver! You never can tell untill it happens! ESPECIALLY if this is her first child! She's got a lot of nerve trying to dictate to you what she will or will not do. I think you have the right to dictate what will or will not be considered "light duty" until she has the baby. I think you have the right to offer her an "alternate work assignment" until the baby comes. I ALSO think she could go on unpaid "Family Leave" if you (or she) decided that was a good thing. Now that she has walked out on you, I think you are in a good position, actually! If she comes back and begs for her job back, I think you have a good opportunity to sit down with her and work out an arrangement of duties that she will (or will not) be expected to carry out. SHE quit on you! You don't have to hire her back unless you want to! I think you have the right to say that you will "want" to hire her back ONLY if you can come to an agreement on duties. This girl may seem like the nicest person you've ever met but I think that somebody who would make an outburst like that has some personal problems going on in her life. Frankly, this may be the best thing for BOTH of you. I wouldn't loose any sleep over it!  |  IP: Logged Jon Bartow Master Film Handler Posts: 287 From: Massachusetts Registered: Nov 1999 posted 04-08-2003 08:06 AM                     Having a wife that is currently 5 months pregnant I am well versed in the current thinking of pregnant women working. And basically it is up to the woman and her doctor. But some basic guidelines are: No lifting over 30lbs Don't stand on your feet for over an hour at a time without stopping to put your feet up for 15min or so Avoid fumes of any type Eat many small meals throughout the day All of these basic rules seem to preclude someone from working in a booth at all while they are pregnant. It is however, up to her as she knows her body and what risks she is willing to take. Except for double-ups she should not have to use the bottom platter. My wife had a very hard time picking up anything on the floor at 3 months. A 6000' reel is too heavy and awkward to handle when your balance is messed up anyway. Have her move prints on 2000' only or 6000' reels filled to the 4000' mark. Perhaps not having her scheduled on Thurs night for the remainder of her pregnancy. As for her "late because of a 3pm nap" line, balony. She can work her sleeping times around her work schedule. Perhaps she should go to bed earlier in the evening instead of watching the late show. A couple of years ago I met a projectionist in Mass who worked in the booth right up until a week before her due date. I met her during her last week of work. When I first saw her she was carrying two 6000's (one in each hand). I taught her how to change a faulty automation microswitch that day (involved being on your knees) On the other hand, we have a friend who was bedridden from three months on. Long story short, it really is up to her, but if she can't do it, send her elsewhere. Jonathan  |  IP: Logged Dick Vaughan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1032 From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK Registered: Jul 2000 posted 04-08-2003 11:39 AM                        The link below takes you to the UK government pages devoted to Health & safety at Work and Employers responsibilities when dealing with pregnant employees http://www.tiger.gov.uk/maternity/employer_april03/hands.htm Might be of help. I would imagine most countries Departments of Employment or Labour (pun not intended )have similar sites  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 04-08-2003 02:50 PM                        'tiger.gov.uk'?! Does this mean that John Prescott's two Jags have now been put online?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.