Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » "View From The Top" - Bad Azimuth?

   
Author Topic: "View From The Top" - Bad Azimuth?
Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 04-09-2003 09:39 PM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Highlight II,
Simplex Millenium with 5-star soundhead
Dolby CP-500
Feature" View From The Top"

While doing service at one of our theatres this morning, the projectionist mentioned to me that he had to switch of the auto digital function in his 500 due to frequent drop-outs in the feature "View From The Top". Scoped the digital, was only a little below optimum level. Raised it to where it should be.

I had been thinking for some time, of using Brad's idea of an "average" film strip to use as a basis for azimuth settings. I connected and set up the DRAS to check the various azimuth errors of the corporate trailers (adds), trailers and feature in this cinema where the drop-outs had been.

Following are my azimuth readings (in brackets);

CORPORATE TRAILERS:
Dove (0)
KIA (1)
Hewlett Packard (1)
National Post (0)
2010 bid (0)

Coming Soon snipe (-1)

PREVIEWS:
Shaolin Scoccer (0)
Down With Love (0)
Identitiy (0)

Feature Pres.snipe(-1)
"VIEW" Reel 1 (4)
"VIEW" Reel 2 (3)

As you can see, ignoring the feature, practically any one of these could have been used as an average without going to far astray. Until, of course one includes the feature. These azimuth rates would skew the other results. As drop outs did not occur during the corps or trailers one must assume that it is the azimiuth on the feature that is at fault.

Has anyone ever tried ordering a replacement print using "bad azimuth" as an excuse?

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-09-2003 09:53 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, but simply saying, "Won't play in Dolby Digital", is a perfectly good excuse.

If they try to blame it on your equipment you have three "outs":

1) The theater's engineer has calibrated the equipment to recommended specifications on <insert date here>.

2) All OTHER prints, previews and advertisements play PERFECTLY.

3) This print does not play in Dolby Digital no matter which projector it is played on.

If they don't give you a new print after THAT maybe you should collect up all the receipts from the rain checks you had to give out because of poor sound then take them to TES's office and STAPLE THEM TO THE WOMAN'S FOREHEAD! [evil] [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Wienholt
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Towson, MD, USA
Registered: Dec 2002


 - posted 04-09-2003 10:23 PM      Profile for Tom Wienholt   Email Tom Wienholt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
If they don't give you a new print after THAT maybe you should collect up all the receipts from the rain checks you had to give out because of poor sound then take them to TES's office and STAPLE THEM TO THE WOMAN'S FOREHEAD!
Just because the movie couldn't be shown in digital doesn't mean that the quality of the sound will be bad. That doesn't really make sense.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-09-2003 10:42 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I agree that a properly tuned analog system can sound just as good as a digital one.

...BUT...

First, if you advertise that the movie was to be played in digital sound and then customers somehow catch you NOT playing it in digital sound, for whatever reason, you OWE it to them.

Second, you want him to get a new print, don't you? [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Wienholt
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Towson, MD, USA
Registered: Dec 2002


 - posted 04-09-2003 11:07 PM      Profile for Tom Wienholt   Email Tom Wienholt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I think he should get a new print.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 04-09-2003 11:55 PM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have advised the manager to get in touch with his district manager ect., ect., and hopefully they will order a new print. I only wish they would call us earlier when this happens, this print has been here for at least a week now.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-10-2003 04:54 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting. I find it rare to see the azimuth range more than +-2 from "average" on a large trailer pack. Generally they are all -1, 0 or +1. I'm betting it was bad printing. I'll look at the error rate on this film tomorrow when I am out and about, but there have been no playback issues here.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-10-2003 12:45 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The prints that I, Press screened for Miramax ran fine with no
problems in the SRD track. About a year ago we were doing a
answer print check of the SRD track to the restoration of
the film "El Topo". The lab had printed the off center and it would not play. The back-up was mono and the SRD was 5.1 .

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-10-2003 02:22 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An azimuth issue is more likely due to the sound negative recorder than the printer. If the sound negative has an azimuth problem, all prints would be affected. A sound negative problem normally would be caught in lab QC, but a printing problem with a single reel might get missed.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-10-2003 08:19 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I just looked at a print running on a cat701 reader with a CP500 and it is sitting firmly on "0", occasionally flipping to "1". This is in the last reel. I'll try and remember to look at it in a bit when it restarts for reel 1 and 2.

John, couldn't that only affect one of the printing negatives and not literally every print?

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-10-2003 09:40 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
John, couldn't that only affect one of the printing negatives and not literally every print?
If the azimuth problem were with the sound negative recorder, it's likely most of the sound negatives for that production would be affected until the problem was caught. But yes, multiple negatives are made for each reel, depending on the number of prints in the release and the number of labs worldwide doing the printing.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-10-2003 09:54 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Reel 1 is toggling between 1-2 evenly.
Reel 2 is sitting firmly on 1.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.