|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Century SA focus shift
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-15-2003 07:49 PM
John, I recall seeing once that the lateral adjustment of the lens holder was locked down tight while I was in the field. Seems as though the operators tried to focus with that lateral adjustment locked down. The lens housing moved ok, on the bottom only. I wonder if somewhere that happened to your machine before you got the machine. There is a distinct possibility the whole lens holder is sprung. If it is, you are screwed. A new one would be in order. I don't know if there is a way to un-spring it.
Try this: As you turn the focus knob from one extreme to the other, see if the inboard side and the outboard side of the lens holder moves by the same amount. It should. If it does not, there is a bind somewhere. Then, use a machinist's ruler to see if the inboard side of the lens barrel distance to the projector casting is the same as the outboard side. If not, you found the problem. All that is left is to find out what part is actually bent or sprung.
Edit: I wonder if there could be a problem with the support gib being improperly seated or sprung, or maybe the screws holding it to the main casting are loose......I have seen this machine of John's - it looked like a rebuilt of the rebuilt's rebuilt. However, it is a nice looking machine. It could have orginally been a "cobble" job....
I had a Simplex XL that gave exactly the same indication John is experiencing. In my case, the P-1633 studs on the P-1621 Film Trap Door Support Bracket were sprung.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-16-2003 09:17 AM
OK, let's review the check list:
1. The focus problem is present on both flat and scope movies. 2. New replacement band set has been installed. 3. The lens was rotated and the focus problem did not follow along with it. 4. Shims were tried in one side of the solid rail assy. 5. Lens holder moves smoothly without binding. 6. Proper fastening of the gate parts to the casting. 7. Adjustment of band tension had a small effect on the focus. 8. Xenon lamp alignment seems to be OK. 9. Different trap shoe and gate assembly was tried in this machine. 10. Machine is not equipped with a turret.
Questions:
1. Was a magic marker used to "paint the rails" and a loop run through for a few minutes to check the wear pattern on both the shoe and bands? 2. Did you check to see if the lens holder is square with the projector casting? 3. Did you install the shoe upside down and run a test loop to see if the focus problem shifted to the other side of the screen? 4. Did you "sneak" the film trap open just a slight bit with the projector running and see if the focus change was even across the screen? 5. When the bands were installed, did they properly align with the small dowell pins so they could not cock to one side or the other? 6. What is the positioning orentation of the four screws that holds the light tube (the part that has the trap release knob) with respect to the elongated holes in that assembly? 7. If you focus in the center, how far out oof focus is the sides, and are mis-focused equally? Comments: 1. Dick Prather mentioned the dovetail slot for the for the film trap body. If the trap is not perpendicular to the lens assembly, there will be a definate focus problem as you described. 2. Dick also mentioned the studio guide. Since you have a Century SA, I would presume Dick is addressing the lateral guide roller as well as the studio guides themselves. If so, pinching of the film could cause a focus problem. 3. John Pytlak again mentioned the shim procedure. I suggested the use of a matchbook cover. When you tried it, what was the focus change from before and after? Was it better or worse? 4. John also mentioned to check the band tension on both sides. That is an excellent idea. 5. John also mentioned a mis-alignment of the film path. It would be well worth inspecting.
More suggestions:
Check the gib to make sure it is not warped. Dick mentioned the use of a square to do that. I can see the gib getting sprung because of the recoil of the gate smashing the film trap assembly when closing. Allowing this to happen is a common problem most projectionists seem to forget about. If something is slammed closed hard enough and long enough, something is going to get sprung. The coil spring in the gate closure mechanism may be set wrong which will aggervate the problem. I have seen some so tight that if a finger somehow was in the way when the gate closed, it would give you a nasty blood blister on your skin. I set mine so the gate will close and seat smoothly without slamming. There is a distinct possibility the gib is warped or as Dick mentioned, the dovetail could be warped. Another possibility is the light tube is actually too close to the gate. What I mean by that is, when the gate is closed, it might be bottoming out one of the bands.
Also, try this:
Put film in the machine,and bar it through by hand. When the starwheel indexes and starts its pull-down, how much resistance do you feel on the motor? Then do the same without film. I am sure you will feel some resistance on pull-down, but with film in the machine it might feel more like a bind. If the resistance is excessive, I would definately suspect you have a very tight gate. Then sneak the gate open just a little to remove tension, and see if it feels better. Of course without film, it'll probably roll nice and freely. If the gate is really crushing the film, that could account for the thrust changes in the pinion shaft of the soundhead. Also, it would probably not pass poor splices without losing a loop or two.
I am starting to get convinced the problem will be found in the actual positioning of the light tube, a bent dove fit in the film trap, or the gib is sprung. Also when you focus nice and clear on the left side of the screen, which way do you have to turn the focus knob to focus the other side. How much do you have to turn it to get the right side in focus? If you have to turn the focus knob counter-clockwise as viewed from the front, I would definately suspect gate parts being worn or sprung.
Sooooo......check these things and give us some feedback.
Keep us posted. One way or the other, we'll get it solved.
Edited for adding more information [ 04-16-2003, 06:09 PM: Message edited by: Paul G. Thompson ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-17-2003 07:48 PM
John, No. 6 could be your problem. It may be jamming the bands too heavily. I suggest positioning the light tube just a little more forward so the trap shoe doesn't smash them so bad. One could be bottoming out. Trial and error will achieve the correct setting. I checked my SA today, and the screws were in the center of the oblong holes in the light tube casting.
I had a suspicion that the inboard side would show a little heavier wear than the outboard side. I'll bet the trap was slammed shut too many times through the years, and it sprung the gib, especially with the light tube being as far back as it could go.
I talked to Donna today, and she said the focus problem is minor.
Nevertheless, it is not perfect. A Century SA should be capable of perfect focus. That is what we are shooting for. However, a possibility does exist the light tube assy is warped just a little, but I doubt it. If there is a problem, more than likely there is a hunk of shit wedged between the light tube bracket and frame, or that surface was painted when the machine was rebuilt. Those surfaces should not be painted. They are machined surfaces. The paint thickness differences even so much as .002 thick can interfere with proper alignment.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|