Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Is there info. about contents of each 20 min reel?

   
Author Topic: Is there info. about contents of each 20 min reel?
Don E. Nelson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 138
From: Brentwood, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 2001


 - posted 05-07-2003 05:38 PM      Profile for Don E. Nelson   Email Don E. Nelson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is there a website, datbase, directory that lists (a brief editorial review) of the contents of each (broken down) 20 min. reel of a theatrical feature, when it is in its shipping configuration?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-07-2003 09:50 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You want to find a review of each reel? I used to do this sometimes in my mind (like "first reel great, second reel excellent, third reel...er...this started out so promising and now it's turned stupid") but I've never heard of a listing like you seek. Why would you want this?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-08-2003 05:54 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some film archives catalogue their holdings this way, providing a descriptive account of a film's narrative with reel and footage references to identify this scene. The reason for doing this is to allow researchers to identify the particular bit of a film they're interested in from the catalogue, and thus reduce the number of cans that have to be pulled up from the vault. For example, if a TV researcher was working on a documentary about Hitchcock and wanted to use a clip from the shower scene in Psycho, the archive would only have to pull out, say, reel 3, and tell the telecine operator to make a digibeta of 672-1084ft.

As a general rule, the public sector film archives will do this sort of cataloguing:

quote:
R1(0) Opening Titles. (309) Fred (Joe Bloggs) appears at enters the doorway of his ex-wife's apartment block. Shortly afterwards we hear a single gunshot. Fred leaves the block by the rear entrance, making sure no-one is watching him. (752) Inside the local police station. A 'phone rings on the duty officer's desk....
Whereas TV libraries and commercial stock-shot agencies tend to use a form of cataloguing called shotlisting, because it gives users more accurate information about the content of each shot. For example:

quote:
(309)GV ext. 1930s apartment block. (325) MCU Fred, lights cigarette. (337) ML apartment block entrance...
That way, if a broadcaster wanted to find stock footage of someone in a 1930s costume smoking (for example, to illustrate a documentary stating that no-one thought smoking was dangerous in the 1930s), this information would let him find it, whereas the narrative description above wouldn't. As you might have guessed, shotlisting takes a lot longer than descriptive cataloguing (which is why public archives rarely do it) and sometimes requires very specialist knowledge. For example, if you were catalouging a war propaganda film, it would help to know precisely what type of aeroplane or tank you were looking at. If a documentary maker wanted footage of a Spitfire Mk. I but not a Mk. II, you would need that information on your database in order to service the request.

You can find lots of examples of shotlist cataloguing on the British Pathé newsreel website.

I, too, can't think of any reason why a projectionist would need this sort of information, though.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 05-08-2003 06:01 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only reason I can think of would be someone trying to get a really confusing film in the right order after somebody chopped off all the leaders and tossed them away.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-08-2003 08:29 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A David Lynch or Quentin Tarantino film, just to make things easy! [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-08-2003 01:14 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, there is also a cutting continuity which is akin to a script but with a shot by shot description with footage and frame counts.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-08-2003 01:18 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the case of older titles these often don't survive, and they wouldn't have been produced in the first place other than for studio-made feature films. Where they do survive (as with other screenplay-related documentation) they can be extremely valuable for archives, as they can identify things (e.g. the towns or streets in which location shooting was done) which would be quite impossible through normal cataloguing or shotlisting techniques.

 |  IP: Logged

Don E. Nelson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 138
From: Brentwood, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 2001


 - posted 05-08-2003 02:19 PM      Profile for Don E. Nelson   Email Don E. Nelson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
..........well if you must know, i just hope John P. isn't listening,

I like to buy (odd) 35mm reels of features, (they are usually cheap, and I can edit out the good scenes and use the rest of the film for scene editing practice[w.o syn sound] on my
upright moviola)

And yesterday I see this add on the net where this guy is selling reel 5 of the latest blockbuster.
(I'd rather not give the title, .......but it is a trilogy made in Australia, and the directors first name is Peter, and it came from a famous book about little people)
And I though, gee .............what happened in reel 5, 100 minutes into this 3 hour film? what part of the story were they telling, and there you have the reason for the (odd) question.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-08-2003 02:24 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
..........well if you must know, i just hope John P. isn't listening...

[Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-11-2003 11:24 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whow, Don, you want a description of each scene in each reel?!! I would be happy just to find out what aspect ratio the thing is meant to be projected in and if it is Dolby A or Dolby SR, IMDB not withstanding (that database is riddled with errors).

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-11-2003 12:08 PM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A few years ago I received an American rejuvenated print, when I suspected a couple of reels were in the wrong order. I was right as the distributor (UIP) had the script of the film, and was able to describe the scene and shots on the end and beginning of every reel. I also had from Warner’s a copy of POLICE ACADEMY 12? with two reels of reel 3 and no reel 5. I had a third replacement copy on the first day of showing, as the 2nd replacement copy had the end of the film footage completely missing spliced onto the cast list.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.