my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Hardware vs. Software Oscilloscopes

Author Topic: Hardware vs. Software Oscilloscopes Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 06-03-2003 08:41 PM                        I think we touched the subject before, but I would like to have some fresh input as I am setting myself up here with equipment in the US. The idea of having a software scope is still very appealing as it means less equipment to carry around except for the adapter to the soundcard inputs. Is it generally possible to calibrate them well to the inputs of the soundcard? I have a Toshiba 2,0 GHz Pentium 4 notebook but I do not know yet which soundchip it has (it is sitting in the car right now). Otherwise, which oscilloscopes which are readily available on the American market would you recommend? What are the price windows for both solutions?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-04-2003 12:39 AM                     Michael, CRT based scopes are still the best way to go, unless you have megabucks (8500.00 U.S.) to spend on a very high end LCD color scope. Most software based scopes will not properly display a L-R signal fomr the test film.....some other signals are also very difficult to look at on the LCD based scopes. Since Tektronix makes the best scopes, look to E-Bay for a good deal on a used Tektronix 465B scope. Its still the industry standard 100 mhz scope(most do 150 meg!). There are probably many available on E-Bay in Germany, or close by....so you can deal with that back home and savre duties going back. Mark  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 06-04-2003 02:19 AM                        quote: megabucks No, no! quote: so you can deal with that back home Actually it looks like I might stay here (S.D.) for a while.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-04-2003 06:24 AM                     South Dakota? ````````````````````````````````````You must have a distant relative that has a cattle ranch out there....... Possibly they were immigrents and then became squatters back in the early 1800's.....? I wasn't aware that airlines went from Germany to S.D., perhaps you hitch hiked or took a box car from New York......? Are there actually people STILL living in South Dakota? I thought that Locust ate all the people living there a long time ago....Wasn't there something in the in the Bible about that, Old Testament? Where are you getting real Beer from out there? That could become a serious problem! Anyway, Salt Lake City is the next stop that Box Car will make!! We have real good beer here but its a but towards the unleaded side of the scale. Anyway,,,,,....Have fun! Keep your eye out for abandoned Drive Inns that have not been open for decades! We have a full time technician out there near South Dakota some place...His name is Dennis....... Mark  |  IP: Logged Kris Brunton Expert Film Handler Posts: 108 From: Napanee, Ontario, Canada Registered: Apr 2000 posted 06-04-2003 08:17 AM                     I have a Tektronix 210 in my kit when I have to travel light. We also have a few CRT scopes hanging around for typical use. Someone gave me a copy af a software based scope but as my laptop can't handle two line inputs I haven't really played with it.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-04-2003 08:24 PM                     Leader a pain to fix but small and compact  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-05-2003 12:25 PM                        I am sure that software scopes, just like hardware scopes come in the range of so-so to best-in-show, but since I've never seen any technical benchtest reviews of them, I was pretty much shooting in the dark when I picked mine on a whim. Believe me, there are too many variables to take them seriously -- what computer processor you are using, what are the characteristics of the sound card, what are the current glitches lurking in your memory that you don't know about, and the Microsucks Windblows operating system in general. And then there's software -- IMHO way to easy for your winding up one that is at the bottom of the accuracy list. And after looking at scopes since childhood, I can tell you that the software/laptop scope, for me anyway, is impossible to look at. And as I said, I don't trust them. But then again, when I push SEND on my email, I don't trust it is actually going to get there -- so don't go by me. Frank  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.