my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Prints Shedding Blue/Purple Dust. (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Prints Shedding Blue/Purple Dust. Frank Aston Film Handler Posts: 54 From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK Registered: May 2000 posted 08-11-2003 02:21 AM                     Has anyone encountered this problem with certain UK release prints? Bruce Almighty and Charlies Angels were particularly bad. I've scrutinized all my line-ups, sprockets, gate pressure pads, xenon outputs etc but, in any case, the problem is not common to any particular machine.  |  IP: Logged Michael Brown Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1522 From: Bradford, England Registered: May 2001 posted 08-11-2003 06:51 AM                     I've had it on the few occasion that I've had new prints. Not sure what it is.  |  IP: Logged Frank Aston Film Handler Posts: 54 From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK Registered: May 2000 posted 08-11-2003 10:31 AM                     Thanks Micheal. Have you noticed if it's common to any particular lab?  |  IP: Logged John Spooner Expert Film Handler Posts: 186 From: South Australia, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 08-11-2003 11:58 AM                     Dear Frank and Micheal. Your post is certainly timely as I am currently running Charlie`s Angels and the same coloured dust is occurring. Noted it tonight especially on the inner roller of the hold-back sprocket. Assuming the roller could be misaligned I cleaned and reset it, however it may not be the roller seeing your same dust experience. Due to the colour of the dust I assumed the edge of the roller or another guide could have been grazing the digital track on the film edge, but upon inspection the roller was correct and no sign of any grazing to the film stock. I also had the same thing occur during "The Core", exactly the same coloured dust, but on another machine and the dust built up at the top of the gate runner. A very unusual thing as we would agree. John Spooner. South Australia.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 08-11-2003 02:01 PM                        What is the full magenta edge-print ID of the reels affected? It could be either a stock issue, or a lab issue if the same problem is affecting multiple theatres. At the lab, the process machine drying conditions and whether they follow the Kodak processing specification for edge-waxing are pertinent to scuffing type emulsion debris.  |  IP: Logged John Spooner Expert Film Handler Posts: 186 From: South Australia, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 08-11-2003 02:26 PM                     Dear John. Thank you for your reply both personally and on the forum. I will be at the same theatre again tonight and will attempt to note the edge details. From what I understand, most Australian copies are processed in Sydney by Atlab, will ask my management to ascertain from the distributors. There has been no change in projector settings or ambient humidity. Also the same thing occurred on some spools of "Ned Kelly", which was made in Australia and certainly would be Australian processing. Best regards to you and Teeny Weeny. John Spooner.  |  IP: Logged John Spooner Expert Film Handler Posts: 186 From: South Australia, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 08-12-2003 11:18 AM                     Dear John. Here are the edge nos for the 6 spools of Charlies Angels which is leaving the purple dust. Spools 4-6 are the worst. spool 1. 2383 954 088 1 12 KODAK 22 2003 A spool 2. 2383 954 088 1 16 KODAK 22 2003 R Spool 3. 2383 954 008 1 30 KODAK 22 2003 U Spool 4. 2383 954 088 1 34 KODAK 22 2003 J Spool 5. 2384 954 089 1 00 KODAK 22 2003 Y Spool 6. 2383 954 088 1 35 KODAK 22 2003 U Best regards. John Spooner.  |  IP: Logged Bill Langfield Master Film Handler Posts: 280 From: Prospect, NSW, Australia Registered: Apr 2001 posted 08-12-2003 02:35 PM                        Hey John(s) The 'purple dust' you mention has been around for as long as I can remember, it simply just turns up in certain prints no matter what lab made them or what film stock they used. No one I know has ever documented it, perhaps we should start now. We used to call it a 'green print'. (Not fully dried at the lab) I have no idea what causes it, the film is never damaged as far as Ive seen. But it gives you a damned good scare when you go to lace up the next show and see all that purple stuff on the intermittant sprocket and on the gate pressure pads. Straight away thing thinking you've missed theaded the last show. OUCH When you get prints that do this, that junk, is erm, an easy way to determine if the projectionist the night before bothered cleaning the machine. The only print Im having trouble with a the moment is T3, its leaving a (moderate) white dust on certain rollers, dont know what that is. Bill.  |  IP: Logged Michael Brown Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1522 From: Bradford, England Registered: May 2001 posted 08-12-2003 02:52 PM                     It seems to be something that happens with brand new prints. I show 95% second run and it's never occured with those. I've just had it happen about 3 or so times that I've had brand new prints for preview screenings.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 08-12-2003 03:35 PM                        "Green" prints, fresh from the lab, may tend to leave more debris during the first few times through a projector. First, the freshly processed and dried gelatin emulsion takes time to "harden". Time, and the first few times through a hot projector gate will harden and "polish" the surface of the film to better resist abrasion from the projector. Kodak processing specifications and SMPTE Recommended Practice RP151 both recommend application of edge wax or other lubrication after processing to reduce the frictional coefficient of the film surface and help resist scratches and abrasion. Second, the gelatin emulsion swells with water in the processing solutions. Although it usually shrinks back to its original size when the film is dried after processing, sometimes the emulsion "hangs over" the film edges and perforations, and will get scuffed off during the first few projections, leaving a bit of dust and/or skivings. Today's on-line film cleaners are very effective in removing this debris so it doesn't show on the screen and before it may become embedded in the film.  |  IP: Logged Greg Routenburg Expert Film Handler Posts: 178 From: Toronto, ON, Canada Registered: May 2003 posted 08-13-2003 01:06 AM                     Ah yes, this purple dust you speak of is quite common with most prints we run at our theatre. The trick is to keep it cleaned off because it seems to build up especially on the film runners in the gate and cause unnessicary friction which can't be good for the SDDS tracks. A simple utility cloth usually takes care of it. I'm constantly stuggling with the guys that thread at my theatre to stay on top of it but it's an ongoing battle.  |  IP: Logged Chris Hipp Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1462 From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas) Registered: Jul 2003 posted 08-13-2003 02:45 AM                     I usually notice this with new trailers and instituationals but never with a print. The purple dust is quite common and usually builds up on the SDDS sprocket.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 08-13-2003 06:05 AM                        FWIW, "Rolling stock" ads and "institutionals" are often printed on print film that is not made by Kodak.  |  IP: Logged Frank Aston Film Handler Posts: 54 From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK Registered: May 2000 posted 08-13-2003 01:15 PM                     Many thanks for all the feedback. I think it's quite a serious problem because it's not long before the dust find its way on to the picture area with consequent image degrading. And nothing seems to shift it. Pirates of the Caribbean also seems to be affected. Could it be anything to do with print quality control bearing in mind the massive print runs these days? Regards, Frank.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 08-13-2003 01:57 PM                        quote: Could it be anything to do with print quality control bearing in mind the massive print runs these days? In my experience, it doesn't really have to do with the number of prints being made or how fast they are being printed. As others have noted, "green print" issues are not new, and fortunately theatres now have better methods of dealing with them by using on-line film cleaners. The 75-year old Kodak publication "Film Mutilation and How To Prevent It" (that Brad just posted) talks about projector abrasion of prints film, and the importance of proper print lubrication and projector alignment in extending print life. The right way to do it doesn't change.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.